期刊文献+

复发缓解型多发性硬化患者脑内病灶动态对比增强MRI灌注及渗透特点 被引量:9

Studies of the perfusion and permeability characteristic in the brain lesions of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨动态对比增强MRI(DCE—MRI)结合Patlak模型评估多发性硬化(MS)患者病灶及看似正常白质(NAWM)区的渗透和灌注特点的价值。方法回顾性分析23例复发,缓解型多发性硬化(RRMs)患者的影像检查资料,所有患者行常规MRI和DCE—MRI检查,然后应用单室Patlak模型进行数据后处理,计算MS患者脑内非强化病灶、病灶旁NAWM区、远离病灶NAWM区的容积转移常数(Ktrans)、对比剂血管内容积(vp)及灌注参数脑血流量(CBF)和脑血容量(CBV),以中位数(上四分位数,下四分位数)表示,采用Kruskal—WallisH秩和检验进行统计学分析,并绘制灌注伪彩图。结果非强化病灶区、病灶旁NAWM区与远离病灶NAWM区的Ktrans值分别为0.132(0.064,0.233)、0.111(0.060,0.233)、0.077(0.044,0.185)min-1,非强化病灶区的Ktrans值明显高于远离病灶的NAWM区(χ2=7.582,P〈0.05),病灶旁NAWM区Ktrans。值与非强化病灶区和远离病灶NAWM区Ktrans。差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。非强化病灶区、病灶旁NAWM区与远离病灶NAWM区的CBV值分别为10.660(5.555,22.193)、9.359(4.883,16.290)、6.814(4.699,13.623)ml·100g-1,非强化病灶CBV明显高于远离病灶NAWM区,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.394,P〈0.05);病灶旁NAWM区与非强化病灶及远离病灶旁NAWM区的CBV差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。3个部位间vp和CBF差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。结论基于T1WI的DCE—MRI结合Patlak模型能定量分析MS患者病灶及NAWM区的灌注及渗透特点,准确地反映MS的血流动力学改变。 Objective To evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with Patlak model for depicting the perfusion and permeability characteristics of lesions and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) regions in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods Twenty-three patients with clinical confirmed RRMS were retrospectively analyzed, who had underwent conventional MRI and DCE-MRI using a 3.0 T MR scanner . The clinical characteristics and imaging data were collected. Post-processing was performed using the Patlak model. Volume transfer constant (Ktrans), fractional plasma volume (Vp) and perfusion parameters including cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were represented as median and interquartile range(IQR). The four parameters of non-enhanced(NE) lesions, NAWM regions located close to NE lesions(NAWM close) and NAWM regions located far from NE lesions (NAWM far) were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H rank sum test. Artificial color mappings were also proceeded. Results MR imaging biomarkers Ktrabs was 0.132(0.064, 0.233) min - 1 for NE lesions, 0.111 (0.060, 0.233) min-1 for NAWM close and 0.077(0.044, 0.185) min-1 for NAWM far, respectively. CBV was 10.660(5.555, 22.193) ml· 100 g-1for NE lesions, 9.359(4.883, 16.290) ml· 100 g-1 for NAWM close, 6.814 (4.699, 13.623) ml. 100 g-1 for NAWM far, respectively. Ktrans and CBV of NE lesions was significantly higher than that of NAWM far(χ2=7.582, P〈0.05; χ2=6.394, P〈0.05, respectively). K and CBV of NAWM close showed no significant differences compared with NE lesions and NAWM far. Vp and CBF had no significant differences between NE lesions, NAWM close and NAWM far regions(P〉0.05). Conclusion DCE-MRI with Patlak model can measure perfusion and permeability characteristics and hemodynamic abnormalities of NE lesions and NAWM regions in patients with multiple sclerosis.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期731-735,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81371523) 国家临床重点专科建设项目(国卫办医函[2013]544号) 重庆市卫生局医学科研重点项目(2011-1-031,2012-1.017)
关键词 多发性硬化 复发缓解性 磁共振成像 诊断 鉴别 Muhiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting Magnetic resonance imaging Diagnosis, differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sourbron S, Ingrisch M,Siefert A, et al. Quantification ofcerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, andblood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI[J].Magn ResonMed, 2009, 62(1):205-217.
  • 2Cramer SP, Larsson HB. Accurate determination ofblood-brain barrier permeability using dynamiccontrast-enhanced Ti-weighted MRI: a simulation and in vivostudy on healthy subjects and multiple sclerosis patients[J].JCereb Blood Flow Metab, 2014, 34(10):1655-1665.
  • 3Ingrisch M, Sourbron S, Morhard D, et al. Quantification ofperfusion and permeability in multiple sclerosis: dynamiccontrast-enhanced MRI in 3D at 3T[J].Invest Radiol, 2012, 47(4):252-258.
  • 4Selchen D, Bhan V,Blevins G, et al. MS, MRI, and the 2010McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary[J].Neurology, 2012,79(23 Suppl 2):S1-15.
  • 5Moll NM, Rietsch AM, Thomas S, et al. Multiple sclerosisnormal-appearing white matter: pathology-imagingcorrelations[J].Ann Neurol, 2011, 70(5):764-773.
  • 6O'Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJ, et al. DCE-MRIbiomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic andvascular disrupting agents[J].Br J Cancer, 2007,96(2):189-195.
  • 7Larsson HB, Courivaud F, Rostrup E, et al. Measurement ofbrain perfusion, blood volume, and blood-brain barrierpermeability, using dynamic contrast-enhanced T(l)-weighted MRI at 3 tesla[J].Magn Reson Med, 2009, 62(5):1270-1281.
  • 8Larsson HB, Hansen AE,Berg HK, et al. Dynamiccontrast-enhanced quantitative perfusion measurement of thebrain using Ti-weighted MRI at 3 T[J].J Magn ResonImaging, 2008, 27(4):754-762.
  • 9宋琼,马静,饶圣祥,姚秀忠,陈财忠,曾蒙苏.MR全肝增强灌注Tofts模型分析对肝癌微循环功能状态的影像生物学标记物的评价研究[J].放射学实践,2013,28(6):662-665. 被引量:27
  • 10Bergamino M, Bonzano L, Levrero F, et al. A review oftechnical aspects of Tl-weighted dynamic contrast-enhancedmagnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in human braintumors[J].Phys Med, 2014,30(6):635-643.

二级参考文献39

  • 1逄利博,马林.多发性硬化的MR灌注成像与病理的相关性[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2007,30(1):25-26. 被引量:2
  • 2Barnet MH,Prineas JW. Relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis: pathology of the newly forming lesion. Ann Neuro1,2004 ,55 :488.
  • 3Adhya S, Johnson G, Herbert J, et al. Pattern of hemodynamic impairment in multiple sclerosis:Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T. Neuro Image,2006,33 : 1029.
  • 4Rashid W, Parkes LM, Ingle GT, et al. Abnormalities of cerebral perfusion in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2004,75 : 1288.
  • 5Haselhorst R, Kappos L, Bilecen D, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging of plaque development in multiple sclerosis : application of an extended blood-brain barrier leakage correction. Journal of Magneetic Resonance Imaging,2000,11:495.
  • 6Wuerfel J, Bellmann-Strobl J, Brunecker P,et al. Changes in cerebral perfusion precede Plaque formation in multiple sclerosis : a longitudinal perfusion MRI study. Brain,2004,127 : 111.
  • 7Keyser JD, Steen Ch, Mostert JP, et al. Hypoperfusion of the cerebral white matter in multiple sclerosis:possible mechanis ms and pathophysiological significance. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism ,2008,28,1645.
  • 8Ge Y, Law M, Tohnson G,et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging of multiple sclerosis lesion : characterizing hemodynamic impairment and inflammatiry activity. AJNR,2005,26:1539.
  • 9Law M, Saindane AM, Ge Y, et al. Microvascular Abnormality in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis:Perfusion MR Imaging Findings in Normal-appearing White Matter. Radiology,2004,231:645.
  • 10Inglese M, Park S J, Johnson G, et al. Deep gray matter perfusion in multiple sclerosis:dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. Arch Neurol,2007,64 : 196.

共引文献37

同被引文献61

  • 1付佳亮,陈晓娅,顾瑶,谢敏,罗琦,韩永良,李咏梅.复发缓解型多发性硬化伴感觉障碍患者脑网络的研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(5):865-869. 被引量:3
  • 2Marek M, Paus S, Allert N, et al. Ataxia and due to lesions involving eerebellar projection pathways: a DTI tractographic study in six pathients. J Neurol, 2015, 262:54-58.
  • 3Selchen D, Bhan V, Blevins G, et al. MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary. Neurology, 2012, 79:1-15.
  • 4Liu Y, Mitchell P J, Kilpatrick T J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of acute inflammatory lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2012, 19:1689-1694.
  • 5Preziosa P,,Rocca M, Mesaros S, et al. Relationship between damage to the cerebellar peduncles and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis. Radiology, 2014, 271:822-830.
  • 6Price S J, Tozer D J, Gillard Jl-I. Methodology of diffusion-weighted, diffusion tensor and magnetisation transfer imaging. Br J Radiol, 2011, 84:121-126.
  • 7Van den Heuvel MP, Hulshoff Pol HE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, 2010, 20:519-534.
  • 8Tournier JD, Mori S, Leemans A. Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med, 2011, 65:1532-1556.
  • 9Kutzelnigg A, Faber-Rod JC, Bauer J, et al. Widespread demyelination in the cerebellar cortex in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol, 2007, 17:38-44.
  • 10Calabrese M, Mattisi I, Rinaldi F, et al. Magnetic resonance evidence of cerebellar cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2010, 81:401-404.

引证文献9

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部