期刊文献+

能谱CT结合低剂量碘对比剂个体化方案成像在颈动脉CT血管成像中的价值 被引量:16

Clinical application of gemstone spectral imaging associated with patient-based low dose of contrast medium protocol for carotid CT angiography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨能谱cT结合低剂量碘对比剂个体化方案成像在颈动脉CTA中的应用价值。方法前瞻性收集临床疑诊为颈动脉狭窄或斑块需行颈动脉CTA检查的患者120例,按照数字表法随机分为常规组和低剂量组行颈动脉CTA检查,每组各60例。2组均采用对比剂个体化方案,按照公式计算对比剂总量,对比剂总量=(扫描延迟时间-5s)×注射流率。常规组扫描参数为管电压120kVp,注射流率5ml/s,图像进行滤波反投影重组;低剂量组采用能谱单能量扫描模式,管电压140、80kVp瞬时(0.5ms)切换,注射流率3ml/s,采用50%自适应统计迭代重组方法重组出单光子60keV图像。对2组图像进行客观评价和主观评分,客观评价指标包括颈动脉CT值、对比噪声比(CNR)及信噪比(snr),并记录对比剂总量和辐射剂量(包括容积CT剂量指数、剂量长度乘积和有效剂量)。两组间图像质量主观评分和辐射剂量的比较采用Mann—Whitneyu非参数检验,图像质量客观评分和对比剂总量的比较采用独立样本t检验。结果常规组颈动脉CT值、背景噪声、SNR、CNR、主观评分、对比剂总量、容积CT剂量指数、剂量长度乘积和有效剂量分别为(363±56)HU、(13±4)HU、30±10、38±13、3.0分、(69±13)ml、13.61mGy、527mGy·(31/1和3.11mSv,低剂量组上述指标分别为(378±69)HU、(9±4)HU、48±19、62±24、2:0分、(49±7)ml、12.72mGy、478mGy·cm和2.82mSv。2组图像间的颈动脉CT值和主观评分差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05),背景噪声、SNR、CNR、对比剂总量、容积CT剂量指数、剂量长度乘积和有效剂量间的差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。结论采用能谱CT结合低剂量碘对比剂个体化方案行颈动脉CTA,在取得良好图像质量的同时,可以减少对比剂用量,降低辐射剂量。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) associated with patient-based low dose of contrast medium protocol in carotid CTA. Methods One hundred and twenty patients who were suspected with stenotic carotid artery or carotid plaque were prospectively enrolled in the study. All of them were divide into two groups by random number table. Group A (routine group): 60 were scanned with 120 kVp after the administration of moderate-concentration CM(320 mg/ml) with 5 ml/s injection velocity, Group B (low dose group): 60 were scanned with GSI which was reconstructed using 50 % ASiR after the administration of the same CM with 3 ml/s injection velocity. The contrast dose ](test bolus peak time + 2 s - 5 s)~ injection velocity] was calculated. Images of the two groups were compared in terms of arterial attenuation, signal-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality (IQ) score. The value of CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) was recorded, respectively. Data were analyzed by using independent samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results The mean attenuation, noise, SNR, CNR, subjective image quality score, contrast dose, CTDIvol, DLP and ED of routine group was (363 ± 56)HU, (13 ± 4)HU, 30 ± 10, 38±13, 3.0 score, (69 ± 13) ml, 13.61 mGy,527 mGy. cm and 3.11 mSv, respectively. The above variables of low-dose-group was (378 ± 69) HU, (9 ± 4)HU, 48 ± 19, 62 ±24, 2.0 score, (49 ± 7)ml, 12.72 mGy, 478 mGycm and 2.82 mSv, respectively. The mean attenuation and subjective IQ score of carotid artery had no significant differences statistically between two groups (P〉0.05), respectively. The noise, SNR, CNR, contrast dose, CTDIvol, DLP and ED had significant differences statistically between two groups (P〈 0.05), respectively. Coneluslon Compared with 120 kVp protocol, the use of GSI associated with patient-based low dose of contrast medium protocol in carotid CTA could provide equivalent image quality and higher SNR and CNR of carotid artery with a smaller amount of iodine and a lower radiation dose.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期774-777,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 福建省科技计划重点项目(2009Y0020) 福建省自然科学基金(2015J01396) 福建省教育厅科技项目(JA08094)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 颈动脉 造影剂 Tomography, X-ray computed Carotid artery Contrast medium
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Pannu HK. Fishman EK. Multideteclur coinpuUMltdino^raphic evaluation of the renal arteryjj |.\l)(lom Imaging.2002.27(6):611-619.
  • 2张保翠,张玉东,赵凯,王霄英,蒋学祥.静脉注射碘对比剂对不同人群肾功能的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,2013,47(4):335-339. 被引量:93
  • 3Toprak O. Cirit M. Hisk factors and therapy strategies forcontrast-induced nr|)liro|>athy[J].Ken Kail, 2006, 28(5):36.S-38I.
  • 4M, Aspflin P. I^ameire N. Contrast-inducediH'plmipathy: a clinical aiul t*vi(lt*nc<*-l>astHl appn)arh[J].Circulation, 2006. 113(14):1799-1806.
  • 5INamimoto T, ()<ia S, Utsunomiya I), el al. Improvemenl ofimage (jualitv at 丨ow-radiati(m (lose a"(丨丨(>w-(‘onlmst materialdose alxiominal d,in patients with cirrhosis: intraiiulividualc(nnparis(.n of low tuht* voltage with ilt*rative reionstructionat^orillim ami slandard tube voltage]J).J (loinpul AssisiTom叩r,2012. 36(4):495-501.
  • 6Takeyanm N. Ohgiya Y, Hayaslii T, et al. Comparison ofdiflVrent volumes of saline flush in the assessment ofperivenous arlefads in tlie sulu-lavian vein <iuring cervicalCTangiography|J|.lirJ Kadiol, 2011, 84(1001):427-434.
  • 7iiae KP. FVak ronlrast enhancenifnt in CT and MKangiography: when does it occur and why. PliarniacHtkinelicstudy in a porcine mn(tel[J].r{a(liolo^. 2(K)3, 227(3):809-816.
  • 8林晓珠,福井利佳,沈云,町田治彦,田中功,汪禾青,上野惠子,陈克敏,严福华.腹部增强能谱CT成像在肾功能不全患者低剂量对比剂扫描中的应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2014,48(10):816-821. 被引量:18
  • 9Clieng J, Yin、. Wu II. et al. Oplimal 丨mmm.limmatk. energylevels ill speclra CT pulmonary angiography for tin*evaluation of piilmonan .,mholism|J|.PIx)S ()n.*. 2013. 8(5):e63140.
  • 10lie J. Ma X. W ang (^). et al. Spe<-tral (:T (ienionstration of thesuperior mesenlerif arlery: (-omparisoi) of immix-hroinatic andpolychnmiatic iniugin^;|JJ.Acai! Hadiol. 2014. 21(3):364-368.

二级参考文献28

  • 1张龙江,祁吉.对比剂肾病:一个值得关注的问题[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(8):882-884. 被引量:69
  • 2Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis ,2002,39:930-936.
  • 3Hou SH, Bushinsky DA, Wish JB, et al. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency : a prospective study. Am J Med, 1983,74:243-248.
  • 4Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, et al. Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol,2006,17:2937-2944.
  • 5National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQ1 clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease : evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis ,2002,39 : S1 -S266.
  • 6Tublin ME, Murphy ME, Tessler FN. Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171: 933-939.
  • 7Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coil Cardio1,2004,44 : 1393-1399.
  • 8Kiski D, Stepper W, Breithardt G, et al. Impact of female gender on frequency of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: post hoe analysis of dialysis versus diuresis trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt) ,2010,19 : 1363-1368.
  • 9McCullough PA, Tumlin JA. Prostaglandin-based renal protection against contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Circulation, 2009, 120 : 1749-1751.
  • 10Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Turcot D, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on prognosis of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 94: 300-305.

共引文献126

同被引文献76

引证文献16

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部