期刊文献+

体外冲击波治疗持续性跟骨痛的临床研究 被引量:2

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of heel pain
原文传递
导出
摘要 对2012年1月至2014年10月收治的98例持续性跟痛症患者分别行体外冲击波治疗(治疗组)和红外线物理治疗(对照组),每组49例,治疗4周为1个疗程,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行评定。治疗结束时VAS足部疼痛和功能评分治疗组为(39.6±6.2)和(25.1±4.6)分、对照组为(32.3±6.5)和(17.4±7.2)分,与治疗前的(16.5±4.6)和(14.4±8.6)分、(16.1±4.7)和(14.6±8.4)分相比,两组足部疼痛明显减轻、功能改善(均P〈0.05);治疗结束后4周随访,治疗组有效率65%(32/49)、改善率31%(15/49),好于对照组的27%(13/49)和63%(31/49)(均P〈0.05)。体外冲击波治疗持续性跟骨痛效果显著,疗效优于物理疗法,适合临床应用。 To explore the therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) for persistent heel pain. A total of 98 patients of persistent heel pain were randomly divided into ESW treatment and control groups (n = 49 each). Treatment group had ESW while control group received infrared physical therapy. And their visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed. After one course of treatment, VAS heel pain and function scores were (39. 6 -+ 6. 2 ) and (25. 1 + 4. 6 ) in ESW group versus (32. 3 + 6. 5 ) and ( 17. 4 ~ 7. 2) in control group. And before treatment, ( 16. 5 ~ 4. 6) and ( 14.4 ~ 8. 6), ( 16. 1 ~ 4. 7 ) and ( 14. 6 ~ 8. 4 ) respectively. Heel pain significantly decreased with functional improvement ( all P 〈 O. 05 ). After one course, the effective rate was 65% (32/49) in treatment group. And the improvement rate of 31% (15/49) was better than control group [27% (13/49) and 63% (31/49) ] (all P 〈0.05). ESW treatment of persistent heel pain was more efficacious than physical therapy and it could be applied clinically.
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2015年第10期781-783,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
关键词 超声冲击波 跟骨骨刺 Shock waves Heel spur
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Moghtaderi A,Khosrawi S,Dehghan F. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy of gastroc-soleus trigger points in patients with plantarfasciitis: a randomized,placebo-controlled trial [ J]. Adv BiomedRes,2014,3 :99-101. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.129369.
  • 2Aqil A, Siddiqui MR, Solan M,et al. Extracorporeal shock wavetherapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis : a meta-analysis of RCTs[ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013,471 (11):3645-3652. doi; 10.1007/sll999-013-3132-2.
  • 3石美鑫.实用外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:249.
  • 4Wilson M, Stacy J. Shock wave therapy for achilles tendinopathy[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2010, 4(1) :6-10. doi: 10.1007/sl2178-0l0-9067-2.
  • 5Radwan YA,Mansour AM, Badawy WS. Resistant plantarfasciopathy : shock wave versus endoscopic plantar fascial release[J]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36 ( 10 ) : 2147-2156. doi: 10. 1007/s00264-012-16084.
  • 6Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis[J]. Am Fam Physician,2011,84(6) :676-682.
  • 7Maffulli G, Hemmings S, Maffulli N. Assessment of theEffectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) ForSoft Tissue Injuries ( ASSERT) : An Online Database Protocol[J].Transl Med UniSa,2014,10:46-51.
  • 8Park JW, Yoon K, Chun KS, et al. Long-term outcome of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis :comparative analysis according to ultrasonographic findings [ J ].Ann Rehabil Med,2014,38(4) :534-540. doi: 10. 5535/arm.2014.38.4.534.
  • 9Crawford F, Thomson GE. WITHDRAWN. Interventions fortreating plantar heel pain[ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2003,(3):CD000416.
  • 10Rosenbaum AJ, DiPreta JA, Misener D. Plantar heel pain [ J].Med Clin North Am, 2014,98 (2) : 339-352. doi: 10. 1016/j.mcna. 2013.10.009.

共引文献21

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部