期刊文献+

结直肠癌筛查高危患者结肠镜下息肉与腺瘤检出率的影响因素 被引量:11

Factors influencing the detection rates of colonoscopic polyp and adenoma in high-risk population in colorectal cancer screening
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨结直肠癌筛查高危患者影响息肉/腺瘤检出率的因素。方法选取2014年5月至2014年11月期间在行结直肠癌筛查阳性后,再行结肠镜检查的患者。按受检者性别、年龄、是否有腹部手术史、是否无痛、肠道准备情况、操作者经验等不同分别计算息肉/腺瘤检出率,各组间检出率的差异采用r检验进行评估,对有统计学意义的因素应用Logistic回归进行多因素分析。结果共有417例患者入组,总的息肉检出率为35.25%,单因素分析显示性别(OR=2.298,95%CI:1.525~3.463)、是否有腹部手术史(OR=0.596,95%CI:0.390~0.910)、是否无痛(OR=1.864,95%CI:1.086—3.200)以及肠道准备情况影响息肉检出率,而多因素分析显示只有性别、腹部手术史及肠道准备情况是其独立预测因素。总的腺瘤检出率为30.22%,单因素分析显示性别(OR=2.113,95%C1:1.382—3.229)、是否有腹部手术史(OR=0.604,95%C1:0.387~0.941)、是否无痛(OR=2.344,95%CI:1.283~4.281)以及肠道准备情况影响腺瘤检出率,而多因素分析显示只有性别、腹部手术史及肠道准备情况是其独立预测因素。结论对于结直肠癌筛查阳性患者,男性较女性有更大的息肉、腺瘤发生风险,有腹部手术史的患者需要更加仔细检查,肠道准备质量对息肉/腺瘤检出率有明显影响。 Objective To investigate the influential factors for the colonoscopic polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenomade detection rate(ADR) in high-risk population in community coloreetal cancer screen- ing. Methods Data of patients who were determined as high-risk population in community eolorectal cancer screening tests and received eolonoscopy in the Digestive Endoscopic Center of Tongji Hospital from May 2014 to November 2014 were collected. PDR and ADR were calculated by different genders, ages, history of abdominal operation, anesthesia assistance, quality of bowel preparation and experience of operators. Thex2 test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare the PDR and ADR between different groups. Re- suits A total of 417 patients received complete colonoscopies. The total PDR was 35.25%. Univariate a- nalysis revealed that gender ( OR = 2. 298,95% CI: 1. 525-3.463 ), history of abdominal operation ( OR = 0. 596,95% CI:O. 390-0. 910), anesthesia assistance ( OR = l. 864,95% CI: 1. 086-3. 200) and quality of bowel preparation were significantly associated with PDR while multivariate analysis revealed that only gen- der, history of abdominal operation and quality of bowel preparation were independent influential factors for PDR. The total ADR was 30. 22%. Like PDR, univariate analysis revealed that gender( OR =2. 113,95% CI: 1. 382-3. 229), history of abdominal operation( OR = 0. 604,95% CI:O. 387-0. 941 ), anesthesia assis- tance( OR = 2. 344,95% CI: 1. 283-4. 281 ) and quality of bowel preparation were significantly associated with ADR. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only gender, history of abdominal operation and quality of bowel preparation were independent influential factors for ADR. Conclusion For patients who were high-risk in community colorectal cancer screening, men have greater risk to develop polyps and adenomas than women. Colonoscopy should be more careful in patients with history of abdominal operation, for quality of bowel preparation is directly related to PDR and AI)R.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 北大核心 2015年第10期649-652,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 结肠息肉 腺瘤 结肠镜 肠道准备 Colonic polyps Adenoma Colonoscopes Bowel preparation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献54

  • 1Naohisa Yoshida,Nobuaki Yagi,Yuji Naito,Toshikazu Yoshikawa.Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(14):1688-1695. 被引量:28
  • 2Siegel R,Naishadham D,Jemal A. Cancer statistics,2012[J].CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2012,(01):10-29.
  • 3Zauber AG,Winawer S J,O'Brien M J. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2012,(08):687-696.
  • 4Davila RE,Rajan E,Baron TH. ASGE guideline:colorectal cancer screening and surveillance[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2006,(04):546-557.
  • 5Rex DK,Johnson DA,Anderson JC. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009[corrected][J].American Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,(03):739-750.
  • 6U.S.Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer:U.S.Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement[J].ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE,2008,(09):627-637.
  • 7Rex DK,Bond JH,Winawer S. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy:recommendations of the U.S.Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer[J].American Journal of Gastroenterology,2002,(06):1296-1308.
  • 8Winawer SJ,Zauber AG,Ho MN. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.The National Polyp Study Workgroup[J].New England Journal of Medicine,1993,(27):1977-1981.
  • 9Winawer S,Fletcher R,Rex D. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance:clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence[J].GASTROENTEROLOGY,2003,(02):544-560.
  • 10Citarda F,Tomaselli G,Capocaccia R. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence[J].GUT,2001,(06):812-815.

共引文献52

同被引文献53

引证文献11

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部