期刊文献+

两种不同生境对豚草入侵影响的实验研究

Effect of Two Different Habitats on Ragweed Invasion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 什么样的生境更有利于外来植物入侵,一直是入侵生态学重点关注的问题。本研究以豚草为实验入侵植物,探讨生境与豚草入侵的关系。通过人工草地群落试验发现,豚草入侵物种多样性水平为1、4、9、16四个不同人工植物群落与入侵有土壤种子库的裸地生境相比,其生物量平均减少590 g·m-2、植株高度平均降低43.7 cm、成活率平均降低21.4%,其在群落中的优势度平均降低0.695。说明已有植物群落定居的生境对豚草的入侵有强烈的抵御作用。由此推断豚草入侵裸地时,生境中存在大量的空余生态位,豚草很容易成为单优势物种,而豚草入侵已有植物群落的生境时,现有植物物种已占据了大量的生态位空间,其入侵性明显降低。研究结果揭示,对外来入侵植物的管理和防控上应采取以预防为主的策略,营造多样化的本地植物群落,减少人为裸地存在时间,可阻挡或延缓外来植物的入侵。 Identifying the sensitive habitats with high invasibility is critical for management of biological invasion. Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia Linn. ) has been identified as one of the most dangerous invasive exotic species in many countries throughout the world. The experiment took ragweek as a model invader to reveal the community invisibility of different habitats. Compared with bare plots, the biomass, plant height, survival rate, and community dominance of ragweed were reduced by 590 g·m-2, 43.7 cm, 21.4% and 0.695 respectively when they invaded communities with four resident species richness (species richness level: 1, 4, 9, 16). The results suggested that the presence of native species had strong negative effects on the performance of the invader species. The presence of native species occupied the niche space and left few empty niches for the colonization of the invaders. The results revealed that planting native species in bare soils, and maintaining the native communities with high diversity, was effective strategies to control the invasion of exotic species.
出处 《农业资源与环境学报》 CAS 2015年第5期511-516,共6页 Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment
关键词 人工草地群落 植物入侵 生物多样性 豚草 入侵抵御 artificial grassland assemblages plant invasion species richness ragweed invasion resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Reddy C S. Biological invasion: Global terror[J]. Current Science, 2008, 94( 10): 1235.
  • 2Lyons K G, Schwartz M W. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function- invasion resistance[J]. Ecology Letters, 2001, 4(4): 358-365.
  • 3Flory S L, Clay K. Non-native grass invasion alters native plant composi- tion in experimental communities[J]. Biological Invasions, 2010, 12(5): 1285-1294.
  • 4Miehls A L J, Mason D M, Frank K A, et al. Invasive species impacts on ecosystem structure and function: A comparison of the Bay of Quinte, Canada, and Oneida Lake, USA, before and after zebra mussel invasion [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(22): 3182-3193.
  • 5Wu Y T, Wang C H, Zhang X D, et al. Effects of saltmarsh invasion by Spartinaalterniflora on arthropod community structure and diets[J]. Bio- logical Invasions, 2009, 11 (3): 635-649.
  • 6Zavaleta E S, Kettley L S. Ecosystem change along a woody invasionchronosequence in a California grassland[J]. Journal of Arid Environ- ments, 2006, 66(2): 290-306.
  • 7Martin M R, Tipping P, Wand Sickman J O. Invasion by an exotic tree alters above and below ground ecosystem components[J]. Biological Inva- sions, 2009, 11(8): 1883-1894.
  • 8Pimentel D, Lach L Zuniga R, et al. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States[J]. Bioscience, 2000, 50 ( 1 ): 53-65.
  • 9Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and e- conomic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 52(3): 273-288.
  • 10Fresard M, Boncoeur J. Costs and benefits of stock enhancement and biological invasion control: The case of the Bay of Brest scallop fishery [J]. Aquatic Living Resources, 2006, 19(3 ): 299-305.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部