行政行为伦理妥协合法性的限度

The Legitimate Limitation of Administrative Action Ethical Compromise

行政行为伦理妥协是一种特殊的行为选择,表现为择小善弃大善,行政行为伦理妥协似乎与公共行政追求公共利益的宗旨相背离,但它又是公共领域不可回避的现象。要确保行政行为伦理妥协获得合法性,得到公众支持,必须从目的、手段和行政人员心理三个维度进行严格限定,确保它只是出于维护和增进公共利益的目的而不是以权谋私,是不得已而为之而不是贪图方便的随意之选,行政人员会感受到一定的心理煎熬而不是冷漠对待。科学限定行政行为伦理妥协,有助于规范行政人员职权行为,避免他们假借妥协之名行渎职之实。

Administrative action ethical compromise is a special action choice. In practice, administrative action ethical compromise performs choosing ＂small good＂ and giving up ＂big good＂. Administrative action ethical compromise seems departing from public good, but it＇s inevitable in public administration field. In order to ensure ethical compromise＇s legal- ity, it＇s necessary to strictly limit form purpose, means and administrative staffs＇ psychology, and make sure it＇s for the sake of public good instead of personal interests. The scientific restriction of administrative action ethical compromise is helpful to restrain public administrative personnel＇s behaviors and avoid malfeasance.