期刊文献+

页岩中矿物组分测定方法探讨 被引量:8

A Discussion on Measuring Methods of Shale Mineral Components
原文传递
导出
摘要 X-射线衍射(XRD)是测定页岩矿物组成的基本方法,其定量精度受到矿物种类、衍射能力、粒度和衍射峰重叠等多种因素影响。选择四川盆地黔浅1井页岩进行矿物组分测定,通过2种实验结果对比,找出提高页岩矿物组分定量精度的方法。方法1:全岩XRD直接测定与定量;方法2:经物相溶解、Stokes重力分离后,对不同粒级的矿物分别进行XRD测定与定量。结果显示,通过2种实验方法获得的碳酸盐类矿物的百分含量差别较大,反映了直接XRD定量方法在矿物组分含量测定中并不是完全可信的。经物相溶解及重力分离后进行XRD测试,可很大程度上提高测试精度,同时获得的页岩中矿物不同粒度的含量对认识页岩成岩过程及页岩性质较各单矿物含量更具有实际意义。 X-ray diffraction is a basic method for determination of shale mineral composition,quantitative accuracy by diffraction by mineral composition,particle size,the diffraction peaks overlap,and other factors.Choose well QQ1#drilling wells hole samples in Sichuan Basin shale mineral components determined,by comparison with two kinds of experimental results,find out the methods of improving the precision for quantitative shale mineral components.Method 1:Whole rock direct determination and quantitative XRD;Method 2:The phase after dissolving stokes gravity separation of different graded mineral XRD measurement and quantitative respectively.Results showed that through two experimental methods have a greater difference between the percentage of carbonate minerals,directly reflects the XRD quantitative methods in the content of mineral component is not fully trusted.The phase after dissolving and gravity separation XRD test can largely improve the test precision and shale in the mineral content of different granularity of shale diagenesis and shale properties than the single mineral content has more practical significance.
出处 《天然气地球科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期1737-1743,共7页 Natural Gas Geoscience
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(编号:2012CB214701) 构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室开放课题(编号:TPR-2012-20) 教育部科学技术研究重大项目(编号:311010)联合资助
关键词 页岩矿物组分 XRD 定量分析方法 四川盆地 Mineral composition in shale XRD Quantitative analysis Sichuan Basin
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Ross D J K,Bustin R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927. .
  • 2Chalmers G R,Bustin R M,Power I M.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area,and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:Examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doigunits[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119..
  • 3Strapoc′D,Mastalerz M,Schimmelmann A,et al.Geochemical constraints on the origin and volume of gas in the New Albany Shale(Devonian-Mississippian),eastern Illinois Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(11):1713-1740..
  • 4Bhargava S,Awaja F,Subasinghe N D.Characterisation of some Australian oil shale using thermal,X-ray and IR techniques[J].Fuel,2005,84(6):707-715..
  • 5Patterson J H,Henstridge D A.Comparison of the mineralogy and geochemistry of the Kerosene Creek Member,Rundle and Struart oil shale deposites,Queensland,Australia[J].Chemical Geology,1990,(82):319-339..
  • 6Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-99..
  • 7Bowker K A.Recent development of the Barnett shale play,Fort Worth Basin[J].West Texas Geological Society Bulletin,2003,42(6):4-11..
  • 8Bowker K A.Barnett shale gas production,Fort Worth Basin:Issnes and discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533..
  • 9Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938..
  • 10陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,刘洪林,魏伟,方俊华.四川盆地南缘下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层矿物成分特征及意义[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):775-782. 被引量:231

二级参考文献109

共引文献515

同被引文献145

引证文献8

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部