期刊文献+

《档案法》与《刑法》衔接视域下档案犯罪刑事责任重构 被引量:17

Reconstruction of Criminal Responsibility in Archive Crimes from the Perspective of Cohesion of Archives Law and Criminal Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 《刑法》对档案安全保护的相关规定在立法的修改中不断趋于完善。但随着社会经济的发展,档案违法犯罪呈现出多样化特点,使得原有的《刑法》对档案犯罪的规制,从罪名设置和构成要件等方面逐渐暴露出诸多缺陷与不足。建议从《档案法》与《刑法》的衔接视域,根据刑法对档案犯罪行为规制的立法价值与目的,将档案犯罪的保护法益调整,不仅是国家对档案的管理制度,而且还包括公私档案的所有权;对档案犯罪定罪进行合理调整,适度扩大档案犯罪圈,将刑法尚未明确的犯罪行为予以刑法规制,重新架构档案犯罪的刑事责任体系,以有效地发挥刑法的保护与保障功能。 The relevant provisions of criminal law in the protection of archives security tend to be gradually improved. However, with the development of social economy, archive crimes show diverse characteristics and some detects and shortcomings have appeared in the original criminal law on the regulation of archive crimes. From the perspective of cohesion of archives law and criminal law, according to the legislative val- ue and purpose of criminal law on the archive crime regulation, the paper suggests that the adjustment of protecting interests of archive crimes should be performed not only in the archives management system of the state, but also in the ownership of public and private archives; rational adjustment of archive crime conviction, moderate expansion of archive-related criminal bound, crime behaviors which are not definite in criminal law should fit into the regulations of criminal law and the criminal responsibility system of archive crimes should be reconstructed in order to effectively exert the protection and safeguard function of crimi- nal law.
作者 仝其宪
出处 《档案学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期54-59,共6页 Archives Science Study
关键词 档案犯罪 法律归属 法益保护 刑事责任 Archive crimes Legal ownership Law interest protection Criminal responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

共引文献25

同被引文献112

引证文献17

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部