期刊文献+

Multiple responses optimization in the development of a headspace gas chromatography method for the determination of residual solvents in pharmaceuticals 被引量:8

Multiple responses optimization in the development of a headspace gas chromatography method for the determination of residual solvents in pharmaceuticals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An efficient generic static headspace gas chromatography (HSGC) method was developed, optimized and validated for the routine determination of several residual solvents (RS) in drug substance, using a strategy with two sets of calibration. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was selected as the sample diluent and internal standards were used to minimize signal variations due to the preparative step. A gas chroma- tograph from Agilent Model 6890 equipped with flame ionization detector (FID) and a DB-624 (30 m × 0.53 mm i.d., 3.00 μm film thickness) column was used. The inlet split ratio was 5:1. The influ- encing factors in the chromatographic separation of the analytes were determined through a fractional factorial experimental design. Significant variables: the initial temperature (IT), the final temperature (FT) of the oven and the carrier gas flow rate (F) were optimized using a central composite design. Response transformation and desirability function were applied to find out the optimal combination of the chromatographic variables to achieve an adequate resolution of the analytes and short analysis time. These conditions were 30 ℃ for IT, 158 ℃ for FT and 1.90 mL/min for F. The method was proven to be accurate, linear in a wide range and very sensitive for the analyzed solvents through a comprehensive validation according to the ICH guidelines. An efficient generic static headspace gas chromatography (HSGC) method was developed, optimized and validated for the routine determination of several residual solvents (RS) in drug substance, using a strategy with two sets of calibration. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was selected as the sample diluent and internal standards were used to minimize signal variations due to the preparative step. A gas chroma- tograph from Agilent Model 6890 equipped with flame ionization detector (FID) and a DB-624 (30 m × 0.53 mm i.d., 3.00 μm film thickness) column was used. The inlet split ratio was 5:1. The influ- encing factors in the chromatographic separation of the analytes were determined through a fractional factorial experimental design. Significant variables: the initial temperature (IT), the final temperature (FT) of the oven and the carrier gas flow rate (F) were optimized using a central composite design. Response transformation and desirability function were applied to find out the optimal combination of the chromatographic variables to achieve an adequate resolution of the analytes and short analysis time. These conditions were 30 ℃ for IT, 158 ℃ for FT and 1.90 mL/min for F. The method was proven to be accurate, linear in a wide range and very sensitive for the analyzed solvents through a comprehensive validation according to the ICH guidelines.
出处 《Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis》 SCIE CAS 2015年第5期296-306,共11页 药物分析学报(英文版)
基金 Universidad Nacional del Litoral (Projects CAI+D 2011 No.PI-50120110100025 LI) ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocin Científica y Tecnolgica,Project PICT 2011-0005) for financial support
关键词 Headspace gas chromatographyResidual solventsPharmaceuticalsSurface response methodologyDesirabiliW function Headspace gas chromatographyResidual solventsPharmaceuticalsSurface response methodologyDesirabiliW function
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1J. somuramasami, Y.C. wei, E.E Soliman, et al., Static headspace gas chroma- tographic method for the determination of low and high boiling residual solvents in hetamethasone valerate, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54 (2011) 242-247.
  • 2Y. Sitaramaraju, A. Riadi, W. D'Autry, et al., Evaluation of the European phar- macopoeia method for control of residual solvents in some antibiotics, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 48 (2008) 113-119.
  • 3K. Fliszar, J.M. Wiggins, C.M, Pignoli, et al., Analysis of organic volatile im- purities in pharmaceutical excipients by static headspace capillary gas chro- matography, J. Chromatogr. A 1027 (2004) 83-91.
  • 4Proceedings of International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Re- quirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), Tri- partite Harmonised Guideline Q3C (R5), Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents, 2011.
  • 5H.M. Mcnair, J.M. Miller, Basic Gas Chromatography, Willey, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2009, pp. 115-118.
  • 6J.L P6rez Pav6n, M.N. Sfinchez, M.E. Fernfindez Laespada, et al., Analysis of class 1 residual solvents in pharmaceuticals using headspace-programmed temperature vaporization-fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A 1141 (2007) 123-130.
  • 7C. B'Hymer, Residual solvent testing: a review of gas-chromatographic and alternative techniques, Pharm. Res. 20 (2003) 337-344.
  • 8C. Cheng, S. Liu, B.J. Mueller, et al., A generic static headspace gas chromato- graphy method for determination of residual solvents in drug substance, J. Chromatogr. A 1217 (2010) 6413-6421.
  • 9K. Urakami, A. Higashi, K. Umemoto, et al., Matrix media selection for the determination of residual solvents in pharmaceuticals by static headspace gas chromatography, ]. Chromatogr. A 1057 (2004) 203-210.
  • 10C.K Poole, The Essence of Chromatography, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Neth- erlands, 2003, pp. ?0-?2.

同被引文献40

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部