期刊文献+

腹腔镜胃食管结合部癌切除术中淋巴结清扫的评价 被引量:2

Laparoscopic gastroesophageal junction cancer lymphadenectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胃食管结合部癌腹腔镜淋巴结清扫的效果及安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年12月重庆医科大学附属第一医院胃肠外科行胃食管结合部癌切除手术72例患者的临床资料,其中开腹组26例,腹腔镜组46例。结果开腹胃食管结合部癌根治术组清扫淋巴结(23±7)个,腹腔镜近端胃癌根治术组清扫淋巴结(24±8)个,两组相比差异无统计学意义(t=0.532,P=0.596);开腹组清扫阳性淋巴结(0.92±0.29)个,腹腔镜组为(0.89±0.23)个,两组相比差异无统计学意义(t=0.508,P=0.613);开腹组中有11例患者淋巴结病理为阳性,而腹腔镜组为16例,两组相比差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.401,P=0.526);开腹组食管切除长度为(2.0±1.0)cm,腹腔镜组为(3.0±0.8)cm,两组相比差异有统计学意义(t=0.471,P〈0.001);26例开腹组患者中有5例(19%)患者术中病理切缘阳性,46例腹腔镜组有6例(13%)患者术中切缘阳性,两组相比差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.491,P=0.483);开腹组中有7例患者,腹腔镜组有3例患者行胸腹联合肿瘤切除,两组比较差异有统计学意义(r=5.781,P=0.016);腹腔镜组清扫的脾门淋巴结(第10组+第11组)数量比开腹组多[(3.9±2.2)个比(2.6±1.7)个,t=0.260,P=0.011],但两组清扫脾门淋巴结的阳性数量[(0.55±0.31)个比(0.70±0.36)个,t=1.782,P=0.079]和阳性比例(7/26比13/46,x^2=0.015,P=0.903)相比差异均无统计学意义;腹腔镜胃癌根治术加脾门淋巴结清扫术手术时间比开腹组短[(192±126)min比(271±152)min,t=0.237,P=0.021],手术出血量少[(104±43)ml比(163±68)ml,t=0.451,P〈0.01]。两组严重手术并发症相比差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜胃食管结合部癌手术在脾门淋巴结清扫方面比开腹手术具备优势,其清扫数量多于开腹手术。腹腔镜食管切除距离较长,能够减少胸腹联合手术的发生。腹腔镜胃食管结合部癌根治术比开腹手术时间缩短,出血量也较少,而且是安全的。 Objective To analyze laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and the safety of gastrectomy for gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods From Jan 2011 to Dec 2012 72 gastroesophageal junction cancer patients were enrolled, including 46 patients in laparoscopic group, and 26 in open surgery group. Results There was no significant difference in the numgbers of lymph node dissection between the two groups and nor difference in the number of positive lymph node dissection. Esophagus resection length in open group was ( 2. 0 ±1.0 ) cm, while that was ( 3.0 ± 0. 8 ) cm in laparoscopic group ( t = 0. 471, P 〈 0. 001 ). 5 (19%)patients in open group had positive margins compared to six in laparoscopic group ( 13% ),x^2 = 0. 491, P = 0. 483. 7 patients in the open group underwent thoracoabdominal resection, while in laparoseopic group 3 patients did, x^2 = 5. 781, P = 0. 016. Laparoscopie splenic hilar lymphnodes dissection harvested more lymph nodes (t = 0.260, P = 0.011 ). Laparoscopic gastreetomy used less operation time ( t = 0. 237, P = 0. 021 ) experinced less blood loss ( t = 0. 451, P 〈 0.01 ) than open group. There was no difference in major complications between the two groups. Conclusions Laparoscopic splenic hilar lymphnodes dissection in gastroesophageal junction cancer surgery is superior to open surgery, with more lymph nodes harvested, longer esophageal cutting distances, lower incidence of thoracoabdominal surgery, shorter operation time, and less blood loss.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期756-758,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
基金 浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金资助项目(2013KYA019)
关键词 胃肿瘤 淋巴结切除术 腹腔镜检查 Stomach neoplasms Lymph node dissection Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Huang CM,Chen QY,Lin JX,et al.Laparoscopic spleen- preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using a left approach[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2014,21(6):205L.
  • 2Komatsu S,Ichikawa D,Okamoto K,et al.Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(3):503-508.
  • 3Nashimoto A,Yabusaki H,Matsuki A.The significance of splenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer[J].Int J Surg Oncol,2012?2012):301530.
  • 4陈钶,牟一平,徐晓武,周育成,严加费,王捷.腹腔镜辅助根治性全胃切除术的Meta分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2012,27(12):1014-1019. 被引量:10
  • 5李国新,牟廷裕,余江,王亚楠,胡彦锋.胰后入路保留胰脾的原位脾门淋巴结清扫在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012,11(1):58-60. 被引量:37
  • 6达布西力特,周家瑜,王隽婕,韩承新,贾元利,郑皓.胃癌联合脾切除的Meta分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,2015,30(2):142-146. 被引量:2
  • 7Li GX,Zhang C,Yu J,et al.A new order of D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer:live anatomy-based dissection[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2010,19(6):355-363.

二级参考文献43

  • 1陈俊强,詹文华,蔡世荣,陆云飞.脾切除并中上部胃癌根治性全胃切除术对患者生存的影响[J].中国普通外科杂志,2005,14(3):161-164. 被引量:6
  • 2黄顺荣,王卫星,徐胜,麦威,秦千子,冯泽荣,牙韩清,朱州,毕连臣,张贵年,钟晓刚,余俊英,韦斌.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌全胃切除术后围手术期疗效比较的研究[J].广西医科大学学报,2007,24(3):382-384. 被引量:7
  • 3Cuschieri A,Weeden S,Fielding J,et al.Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer:long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial.Surgical Co-operative Group.Br J Cancer,1999,79 (9/10):1522-1530.
  • 4Schwrz RE,Smith DD.Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer:who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial.J Clin Oncol,2005,23 (23):5404-5405.
  • 5Li GX,Zhang C,Yu J,et al.A new order of D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer:live anatomy-based dissection.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2010,19(6):355-363.
  • 6Usui S, Yoshida T, Ito K, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparison with conventional open total gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2005, 15:309-314.
  • 7Kim SG, Lee YJ, Ha WS, et al. LATG with extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy: is this minimal invasive surgery for gastric cancer.'? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2008, 18:572-578.
  • 8Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22:1997-2002.
  • 9Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastreetomy. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23:2416-2423.
  • 10Kawamura H, Yokota R, Homma S, et al. Comparison of invasiveness between laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy. World J Surg, 2009, 33:2389-2395.

共引文献46

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部