期刊文献+

技术联盟内合作创新的利益分配机制研究进展 被引量:1

Research Progress on Interest Distribution Mechanism of Cooperative Innovation within Technology Alliance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 缺乏恰当的利益分配机制是合作创新失败的重要原因。成果的无形资产特性、合约的不完全性、创新的复杂性和不确定性等因素使合作创新的利益分配变得极其复杂,不仅需要在事前制订恰当的分配原则和初始合约,最终分配结果还必须根据各方的实际贡献程度进行调整。参与要素特征、各方淡判能力等多因素也对分配结果产生影响。因此,进一步的研究应在辨识各参与要素及其特征的基础上,以合作创新的利益分配合约订立、执行及调整等过程为基本线索,揭示各要素对利益初始分配方案的影响机理及其背后隐藏的分配逻辑,并跟踪观察各类合约的调整过程,发现其调整机理。 Lack of an appropriate interest distribution mechanism is an important reason for the failure of coopera- tive innovation. The results being intangible assets, incomplete contracts, the complexity and the uncertainty of the innovation combine to make the distribution of interests of cooperative innovation extremely complex. An appropriate interest distribution mechanism not only requires appropriate distribution principles and the initial con- tract but also adjustment to the final distribution according to the actual contribution of all parties. Factors such as the characteristics of the participating elements, the negotiation ability of the parties and other factors also affect the distribution of the results. Therefore, further research should be made with identification of the participating el- ements and characteristics, under cooperative innovation benefit assignment contract. Implementation and adjust- ment process should be applied as the basic clue and hidden allocation scheme logic should be revealed. Meanwhile the adjustment process of all kinds of contracts should be tracked to find the adjustment mechanism.
出处 《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第3期99-104,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71473119 71473120)
关键词 技术联盟 合作创新 利益分配机制 利益分配 创新绩效 technology alliance cooperative innovation benefit distribution mechanism benefit distribution innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Rothaermel F T, Deeds D L. Alliance type, alli- ance experience and alliance management capa- bility in high-technology ventures [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21:429-460.
  • 2Xie X M, Zeng S X, Tam C M. How does cooper- ative innovation affect innovation performance? evidence from Chinese firms [J]. Technology A- nalysis & Strategic Management, 2013,25 ( 8 ) : 939-956.
  • 3闫杰,缪小明,张丰,闫斌.我国产学研合作创新研究前沿演进趋势知识图谱[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):151-156. 被引量:11
  • 4Lunnan R, Haugland S. Predicting and measuring alliance performance:a multidimensional analysis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29 ( 5 ) : 545 -556.
  • 5王玉燕,李帮义,申亮.两个生产商的逆向供应链演化博弈分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(4):43-49. 被引量:50
  • 6Liu X, Xiang X F, Lan J. How to improve the performance of R&D alliance? An empirical anal- ysis based on China's pharmaceutical industry [J]. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2010(4) : 130-147.
  • 7Yadong Luo. Procedural fairness and interfirm co- operation in strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29 : 27-46.
  • 8Franz T L, Patrick M K, Mark K W. The influence of current firm performance on future SME alliance formation intentions: a six-country study [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006 (59) :19-27.
  • 9韩敬稳,彭正银.有限理性视角下基于价值结构的企业组织协同分析[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(19):84-88. 被引量:2
  • 10柴国荣,龚琳玲,李振超.产业集群合作创新中信任关系的演化博弈分析[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(2):36-38. 被引量:11

二级参考文献153

共引文献192

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部