期刊文献+

中国学生的保守课堂学习行为及其与中庸思维、批判性思维等的关系 被引量:44

Chinese Students' Conservative Learning Behavior in Classroom and Its relationship with Mean thinking and Critical Thinking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于问卷调查研究发现,中国学生的保守课堂学习行为具有深层次的内涵。在大班背景下,这些保守课堂学习行为背后由三种心理成分构成:自我倾向、习惯倾向和利他倾向。根据这三种心理行为成分之不同组合,可以将学生分为三种课堂学习类型:强习惯保守型、强利他保守型、主动开放型。三者的人数比例约为5:3:2。在中庸思维的指标上,强习惯保守型最强,强利他保守型居中,主动开放型最弱;在批判性思维的指标上,主动开放型最强,强利他保守型居中,强习惯保守型最弱。三种类型的学生在学习结果上没有显著的差异。鉴于批判性思维是创新能力的核心要素,本研究认为,激活中国课堂教学环境,鼓励学生积极参与到学习活动中来,是未来教育改革的重要任务。 Based on questionnaire survey, this research found out the profound meanings of the Chinese students ' conservative learning behavior in the classroom. In a large-sized class, the learning behavior can be interpreted by three psychological inclina-tions: the ego-centered, the customary and the altruistic. Based on the three inclination factors, the students can be clustered into three groups: customarily conservative learners, altruistically conservative learners and actively mind-open learners, which roughly ac-count for 50%, 30% and 20% respectively. In terms of the traditional Chinese mean thinking, the customarily conservative group is the strongest, altruistic group is on the second place, and the mind-open group is the weakest. As for the critical thinking, the order of sequence is just reversed. Since critical thinking is the key part of creative ability, the Chinese educational reform in the future should pay attention to make the classroom more vibrant and encourage the students to be more engaged in learning.
出处 《远程教育杂志》 CSSCI 2015年第5期54-63,共10页 Journal of Distance Education
基金 2012年度江苏省社科基金"创新人才培养与大学生学习的深度变革研究"(项目编号:12JYC012) 2014年度教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"国际比较视野下的中国大学生创新能力及学习环境对其的影响机制研究"(项目编号:14YJA880049) 江苏省"2011计划基础教育人才培养模式协同创新中心"项目(南京师范大学教育科学学院主持)的阶段研究成果
关键词 中国学生 中庸思维 保守课堂学习 批判性思维 Chinese Students Mean thinking Conservative learning in classroom Critical thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1D.L.Paulhus, J. H. Duncan, & M. S. M. Yik. Patterns of shyness in East-Asian and European-heritage students[J]. Jounlal of Research in Personality, 2002,36:442-462.
  • 2M.Cortazzi, & L. Jin. Large Classes in China:Good Teachers and In- teraction. In Watkins D. A. & Biggs J. B. (Eds.). Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives[M]. Hong Kong/ Melbourne: CERC & ACER, 1990, 115-134.
  • 3N.Liu, & W.Littlewood. Why do Many Students Appear Reluctant to Participate in Classroom Learning Discourse? [J]. System,1997,25: 371-384.
  • 4N.Liu, Reticence in Oral English Classroom: Causes and Conse- quences[J].Asian Journal of English Language Teaching,2006,16:45- 66.
  • 5龚放,吕林海.中美研究型大学本科生学习参与差异的研究——基于南京大学和加州大学伯克利分校的问卷调查[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(9):90-100. 被引量:74
  • 6J.Jackson. Case-based Learning and Reticence in a Bilingual Context: Perceptions of Business Students in Hong Kong[J]. System, 2003,31: 457-469.
  • 7M.A.Fukoyama, & T.K.Greenfield. Dimension of Aggressiveness in an Asian-American Student Population[J].Journal of Counseling Psychol- ogy, 1983,30:429-432.
  • 8M.Cortazzi, L.Jin. Culture of Learning: Language Classroom in China. In: H.Coleman (ed.) Society and the Language Classroom [M]. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996,169-206.
  • 9J.Li.Cultural Foundation of Learning:East and West [M].Cambridge: Canrbridge University Press, 2012.
  • 10胡金生,黄希庭.自谦:中国人一种重要的行事风格初探[J].心理学报,2009,41(9):842-852. 被引量:67

二级参考文献98

共引文献578

同被引文献365

引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部