期刊文献+

持续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后早期活动的影响 被引量:22

The effect of continuous adductor canal blocks on early ambulation after total knee arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估持续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)后早期活动的影响。方法接受单侧TKA手术患者60例,男24例,女36例,年龄60~75岁,体重40~75kg,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级。随机分为持续收肌管阻滞组(A组)和持续股神经阻滞组(F组),每组30例。A组接受持续收肌管阻滞,F组接受持续股神经阻滞。记录TKA术后第1、2天每天总的步行距离,膝关节主动弯曲和伸直度,每日阿片类药使用量,疼痛评分及住院时间。结果 A组术后第1天和第2天步行距离分别为(36±5)m和(60±10)m,F组术后第1天和第2天步行距离分别为(4.5±3)m和(21±5)m,A组明显长于F组(P〈0.05)。A组术后第1天膝关节主动弯曲度大于F组(P〈0.05)。两组患者膝关节主动伸直度、每日阿片类药使用量、疼痛评分和住院时间等差异均无统计学意义。结论持续收肌管阻滞可促进TKA术后早期行走。 Objective To investigate the effect of continuous adductor canal blocks on early ambulation of patients after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).Methods Sixty patients(male 24 cases,female 36 cases,aged 60-75 years,weighed 40-75 kg,ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ grade)scheduled for unilateral TKA were randomly divided into two groups randomly,30 patients in each group.Patients in group A received continuous adductor canal blocks,patients in group F received continuous femoral blocks.Patient’s total ambulation distances,active range of knee flexion,knee extension,and the total daily opioid consumption on post operation day 1and 2in each group were recorded.Pain score and days of hospitalization in each group were also recorded.Results The ambulation distance on the first and the second day after operation of group A was higher than group F(P〈0.05).Group A was(36±5)m on day 1and(60±10)m on day 2.Group F was(4.5±3)m on day 1and(21±5)m on day 2.There was no difference in motion range of the knee,pain score,total opioid consumption and the days of hospitalization between group A and group F.Conclusion Continuous adductor canal blocks can promote early ambulation after TKA.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期966-968,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 持续收肌管阻滞 持续股神经阻滞 膝关节置换术 Continuous adductor canal blocks Continuous femoral blocks TKA
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Labraca NS, Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, et al. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroptasty: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil, 2011,25(6) : 557-566.
  • 2Chelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, et al. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16 (4): 436-445.
  • 3Feibel RJ, Dervin GF, Kim PR, et al. Major complications associated with'femoral nerve catheters for knee arthroplasty: a word of caution. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(6 Suppl): 132-137.
  • 4田玉科,梅伟,主编.超声定位神经阻滞图谱.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:258-259.
  • 5Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a review of the published evidence. Anesth Analg, 2011, 113 (4): 904-925.
  • 6Ilfeld BM, Le LT, Meyer RS, et al. Ambulatory continuous femoral nerve blocks decrease time to discharge readiness af- ter tricompartment total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology, 2008,108(4) : 703-713.
  • 7Ilfeld BM, Moeller LK, Mariano ER, et al. Continuous pe- ripheral nerve blocks: is local anesthetic dose the only factor, or do concentration and volume influence infusion effects as well? Anesthesiology, 2010,112(2) : 347-354.
  • 8Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH,et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology, 2013,118 (2) : 409-415.
  • 9Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, et al. Effects of adductor-ca- nal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthro- plasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2012, 56(3) : 357-364.
  • 10Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous Peripheral nerve blocks and pa- tient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg, 2010,111(6) .. 1552-1554.

共引文献2

同被引文献124

  • 1赵晨,杨泉森,吴立东.全膝关节置换术后镇痛治疗[J].国际骨科学杂志,2006,27(2):88-90. 被引量:17
  • 2王兆霞,李峥,刘华平,郭爱敏.全膝关节置换术患者住院期间功能锻炼状况的调查[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(2):159-162. 被引量:40
  • 3张先龙(整理),裴福兴(整理),胡永成(整理).微创人工关节置换技术的专家建议[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(4):307-309. 被引量:11
  • 4Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P,Lund J, et al. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty : arandomized study[ J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2012 ,56(3) :357-364. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1399-6576. 2011.02621. x.
  • 5Jaeger P, Grevstad U,Henningsen MH, et al. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain aftertotal knee arthroplasty: a randomised study [ J ]. ActaAnaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2012 , 56 ( 8 ) : 1013-1019. DOI :10. Ill 1/j. 1399-6576.2012. 02737. x.
  • 6Jankovic D,Peng P. Regional Nerve blocks in anesthesia andpain therapy [ M ]. Springer, 2015. Chapter 63 The AdductorCanal Block ( P844-846).
  • 7Andersen HL, Zaric D. Adductor canal block or midthighsaphenous nerve block : same same but different name! [ J ]. RegAnesth Pain Med,2014,39 (3) :256-257. DOI: 10. 1097/ AAP.0000000000000046.
  • 8Mansour NY. Sub-sartorial saphenous nerve block with the aid ofnerve stimulator[ J]. Reg Anesth,1993 ,18(4) :266-268.
  • 9Bouaziz H,Benhamou D,Narchi P. A new approach forsaphenous nerve block [J]. Reg Anesth, 1996,21 (5) :490.
  • 10Lundblad M, Kapral S, Marhofer P,et al. Ultrasound-guidedinfrapatellar nerve block in human volunteers : description of anovel technique[ J]. Br J Anaesth,2006,97(5) :710-714.

引证文献22

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部