期刊文献+

基于业务流程再造的高校研究生教育质量管理研究 被引量:2

Study of Postgraduates Education Quality Management Based on Business Process Reengineering
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对现有业务流程进行改造和优化,实现流程增值是业务流程再造理论的核心思想。高校硕士研究生教育质量管理也追求管理效率,希望用最小的成本来培养出更优秀、更多的人才。而将业务流程再造理论引入到高校硕士研究生教育质量管理中,是对现有研究生教育质量管理理论的进一步丰富和补充,为现有研究生教育质量管理提供了新的理论视角。西方发达国家高校早在20世纪70年代就已经将业务流程再造模型引入到研究生教育质量管理中,远远早于中国,因此,中国应该要结合自身的实际特点,在借鉴西方发达国家先进经验的基础上,努力构建适合中国高校硕士研究生教育质量管理的业务流程再造模型,进而进一步深化研究生教育改革。 To transform existing business processes and optimized to achieve value-added process is business process reengineering core idea.Postgraduates Education Quality Management also pursue management rate,with a minimum of cost to develop a better,more talent,business process reengineering theory into Colleges Graduate Education Quality Management,graduate education of existing quality management theory further enrich and supplement,providing a new theoretical perspective for the existing postgraduate education quality management.Universities in Western countries as early as the 1970 shad the BPR model into postgraduate education quality management,much earlier than China,so China should be combined with their actual characteristics,learn from the advanced experience of the developed countries of the West basis of efforts to build business process reengineering model for postgraduate Education Quality Management Chinese universities,thus further deepening the reform of graduate education.
作者 程萍
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第5期984-988,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 湖北省高等学校省级教学研究项目(2013125)
关键词 业务流程再造模型 研究生教育 质量管理 business process reengineering model graduate education quality management
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1近20年全国硕士研究生招生考试报录比统计[DB/OL].(2014-04-24)[2014-07-25].中国教育在线,http://kaoyan.e01.cn/nnews-6152/20140424/t20140424-1103649.shtml.
  • 2陈玉琨,沈玉顺.关于高等教育质量本质的探析//胡祖莹.高等教育评价与质量保证:来自五大洲的最新经验和发现.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998.22.
  • 3WEBER L. If You Believe You are Good,Try Insti- tutional Evaluator[M]//AMARAI. A, ROVIOJO- HANSSON A, ROSA M J, WESTERHEIJDEN D. Essays on Supportive Peer Review. New York: NO- VA Science Publisher, 2012 :253-262.
  • 4DEEM R. New Managerialism and Higher Educa- tion the Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom[J]. Interna tional Studies in Sociology of Education, 2008,8 ( 1 ) : 17-70.
  • 5FULTON O. Higher Education Governance in the UK: Change and Continuity [M]//AMARAI. A, JONES U, KARSETH. Governing Higher Educa- tion: National Perspectives on institutional Govern ance. Kordrccht: Kluwcr, 2012:187-211.
  • 6吴丽丽.流程再造(BPR)理论与研究生教育质量管理的探讨[J].高等建筑教育,2006,15(1):109-113. 被引量:9
  • 7Braxton J M, Luckcyw,Holland P. Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains[J]. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 2002,29(2) : 130-135.
  • 8Boyer E L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate [R]. New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Prin- ceton University Press, 1990.
  • 9Shulman L S. From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholar- ship of teaching and learning? [J]. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2000,21 ( 1 ) : 48-52.
  • 10Patel F. Exploring a new model and approach to the scholarship of teaching: the scholarship teach- ing academy[J/OL]. The Canadian Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2010,1 (1) : 130-136.

二级参考文献1

共引文献8

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部