期刊文献+

Proseal、Supreme和I-gel三种双管喉罩用于妇科腹腔镜麻醉的气道管理比较 被引量:9

Effect Comparison on Laryngeal Mask Airway of Proseal,Supreme( SLMA) and Ⅰ-gel during Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Proseal喉罩、Supreme喉罩和I-gel喉罩用于妇科腹腔镜麻醉的实用性和安全性。方法 120例妇科腹腔镜择期手术患者随机分成三组,每组40例,分别置入Proseal喉罩(P组)、Supreme喉罩组(S组)和I-gel喉罩组(I组)。记录三种喉罩置入操作的时间与成功率、肺通气情况、口咽部漏气压(oropharyngeal leak pressure,OLP)、纤维支气管镜检查喉罩对位情况、气道峰压(Ppeak)、胃胀气情况、反流、拔管情况和术后有无咽痛。结果三组患者首次置入成功率在92.5%以上,二次置入成功率为100%。三组准备时间(T0)比较,I组明显短于P组(P<0.01)和S组(P<0.05);而置入时间(T1)比较,P组明显长于S组和I组(P<0.01)。设置通气罩内压(intracuff pressure,ICP)在60 cm H2O(ICP/60)时P组OLP明显优于S组(ICP/60)和I组(P<0.05)。术后24 h随访咽痛患者S组明显多于P组(P<0.05)和I组(P<0.01)。结论三种双管喉罩可安全有效用于妇科腹腔镜手术患者全麻时的气道管理,Supreme喉罩、I-gel喉罩一次性使用,操作更便捷,如麻醉需要较高气道密封性,则Proseal喉罩更适合。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Proseal,Supreme and I-gel laryngeal mask airway( LMA) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 120 women were randomly divided into three groups,40 cases for each,and were intubated laryngeal mask of Proseal( as group P),Supreme( as group S) and I-gel( as group 1) respectively. The placement time and the successful rate of LMA,pulmonary ventilation,oropharyngeal leak pressure( OLP),counterpoint of fiberoptic bronchoscopy,peak airway pressure( Ppeak),gastric distention,regurgitation,complications of extubation and pharyngalgia after surgery were recorded and compared among three groups. Results The success rates of LMA placement was above 92. 5%at first time and reached 100% at second time in all the three groups. The preparation time( T0) of group I was obviously shorter than that of group P( P〈 0. 01) and group S( P〈 0. 05). The insertion time( T1) of group S and group I were remarkable faster than that of group P( P〈 0. 01). When the intracuff pressure( ICP) was kept at 60 cm H20,the OLP of group P was obviously better than that of group S and group I( P〈 0. 05). The postoperative adverse event incidence of pharyngodynia in group S was higher than that in both group P( P〈 0. 05) and group I( P〈 0. 01). Conclusions All the three airway devices can be safe and effective in airway management during gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The Supreme and I-gel can achieve more convenient and quicker intubation with single-use,however Proseal can obtain a better airway sealing.
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2015年第4期315-318,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
关键词 喉罩 麻醉 全身 口咽部漏气压 腹腔镜检查 妇科外科手术 laryngeal mask anesthesia general oropharyngeal leak pressure laparoscopy gynecologic surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1BrimacombeJ.喉罩麻醉原理与实践[M].岳云等,译.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2006:130-145.
  • 2Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway Pro._%.al: arandom- ized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Anaesthasial, 2010, 27(7) :602-607.
  • 3Joffe AM, Liew EC. Intubatian through the LMA-Supreme : a pilot study of two techniques in a manikin [ J ]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2010, 38 ( 1 ) :33-38.
  • 4Gabbott DA, Beringer R. The iGEL supraglottic airway: a potential role for resuscitation? [J]. Resuscitation, 2007, 73(1) :161-162.
  • 5Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, et al. Comparison of four meth- eds for assessing airway sealing pressure with the larynge maskairway in adult patients[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 82(2) :286-287.
  • 6Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airwayposition [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1993, 76(2) :457.
  • 7Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, et al. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery [ J ]. J Clin Anesth, 2003, 15(6) :428-432.
  • 8Timmermann A, Gremer S, Eich C, et al. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic valution of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway[ J]. Anesthe- siology, 2009, 110(2):262-265. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0h013e3181942c4d.
  • 9Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients [ J ]. Anaesthesia, 2009, 64(5) :555-562. doi: 10. llll/j. 1365-2044.2008.05824. x.
  • 10Keller C, Pahringer F, Brimacombe JR. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibrooptie position with thela- ryngeal mask airway [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 1998, 81 ( 2 ) : 186-187.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Asai T, Editorial Ⅱ. Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br J Anaesth, 2004,93: 497-500.
  • 2Brimacombe J.喉罩麻醉原理与实践.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:506-520.
  • 3Brimaeombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, et al. Positive Pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway:a randomized crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg,2001,93:1351-1359.
  • 4Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, et al. The ProSeal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trail with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth, 2002, 88:534-539.
  • 5Brimacombe J,Keller C.A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.Anesth Analg.1998.87:1379-1382.
  • 6Burgard G,Mollhoff T,Prien T.The effect of laryngeal mask cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat incidence.J Clin Anesth,1996,8:198-201.
  • 7Brimacombe J,Keller C,Morris R,et al.A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.Anesth Analg,1998,87.921-924.
  • 8Slater P,Lavies NG.Optimum LMA cuff pressure.Anaesthesia 1996,51,1187.
  • 9Brimacombe J,Berry A,Brain A.Optimal intracuff pressure with the laryngeal mask.Br J Anaesthesia,1996,77:295-296.
  • 10Brimacombe J,Holyoake L,Keller C,et al.Emergence characteristics and post-operative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway:a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume.Anaesthesia,2000,55,338-343.

共引文献72

同被引文献62

引证文献9

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部