期刊文献+

政府行为、风险感知与巨灾保险需求的关联性研究 被引量:42

The Relationship among Government Behavior,Risk Perception and Catastrophe Insurance Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以地震风险为研究对象,以投保意愿与支付意愿作为巨灾保险需求的两个代理变量,并以楚雄州681个农户作为研究样本,从防灾减灾中的政府行为与风险感知两个维度实证检验了巨灾保险需求机制背后蕴藏的"慈善危害"(Charity Hazard)与风险感知效应。结果发现,防灾减灾中政府的工程预防行为会显著降低个人的巨灾保险需求,政府的非工程行为与灾后救助没有表现出"危害"效果,反而起到了促进作用。进一步研究发现,风险感知水平与巨灾保险需求呈现显著的正相关关系,但其对巨灾保险需求的作用力会受到政府行为的削减。这些结果表明,政府在灾害救助中的职能与个体巨灾风险感知对巨灾保险制度的建立和完善具有重要意义。 Based on the Willingness-to-Insure( WTI) and Willingness-to-Pay( WTP),this paper tests the effects of public catastrophe risk mitigations and individual risk perception on the demand for catastrophe insurance using the contingent valuation survey method among 716 farmers in Chuxiong,Yunnan. The results show that government 's engineering mitigation has negative effect on catastrophe insurance demand,but non-engineering mitigation and disaster relief are opposite. Further research indicates that catastrophe risk perception is an important determinant of insurance demand,which will be weakened by government risk mitigations. This paper demonstrates that the current public risk mitigation and individuals' risk perception play a key role in catastrophe insurance system.
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期70-81,共12页 China Soft Science
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"我国巨灾保险制度安排与实施路径研究"(编号:11&ZD053)资助
关键词 巨灾保险需求 支付意愿 政府行为 风险感知 catastrophe insurance demand willingness to pay government behavior risk perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Swiss Re. Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in2012[R]. Zurich,2013.
  • 2Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Cognitive processesand societal risk taking [ J]. Decision Making and Change inHuman Affairs,1977,16:7-36.
  • 3Browne M J,Hoyt, R E. The demand for flood insurance:empirical evidencef J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,2000.
  • 4Kunreuther H. Mitigating disaster losses through insurance[J]. Journal of risk and Uncertainty, 1996,12(2-3) :171-187.
  • 5LindellM K,Hwang S N. Households,perceived personalrisk and responses in a multihazard environment [ J ]. RiskAnalysis,2008,28(2) :539-556.
  • 6GandertonP T,Brookshire D S,Mckee M,et al. Buying in-surance for disaster-type risks : experimental evidence [ J ].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,2000,20 (3 ) :271-289.
  • 7BotzenW,van den Bergh J. Risk attitudes to low-probabilityclimate change risks: WTP for flood insurance [ J]. Journal ofEconomic Behavior & Organization .2012,82 (1) :151-166.
  • 8Lindell M K, Perry R W. The protective action decisionmodel : theoretical modifications and additional evidence [ J ].Risk Analysis,2012,32(4) :616-632.
  • 9Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Cognitive processesand societal risk taking[ M]. Springer, 1977.
  • 10DixonL,Clancy N,Seabury S A,Overton A. The nationalflood insurance program ’ s market penetration rate [ M ].RAND Corporation ,2006.

二级参考文献64

共引文献282

同被引文献774

引证文献42

二级引证文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部