期刊文献+

美国公立大学教师学术自由司法保护的新危机——从加西堤案引发的公言论与公职言论之争谈起 被引量:1

The New Crisis in Academic Freedom Judicial Protection of American Public Faculty—— From the Debate between Public Speech and Public Employee Speech Caused from Garcetti Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在美国,学术自由在获得联邦宪法第1修正案保护之前经历了一个漫长的阶段,学术自由案件判决的重心逐渐集中于公私言论的辨别之上。联邦最高法院对加西堤案的判决,使公职言论登上了历史的舞台,从此开启了公言论与公职言论竞争的时代。 In America,academic freedom has experienced a long period before obtaining the protection of federal constitution's first amendment.The center of judgment in the academic freedom case becomes concentrated in distinguishing the property of public speech or private speech.The judgment of Garcetti case by the U.S.Supreme Court pushes public employee speech to the stage of history,which open a competition era of public speech and public employee speech.
出处 《现代教育科学(高教研究)》 2015年第5期165-170,共6页
关键词 美国公立大学教师 学术自由 加西堤案 公言论 公职言论 American public faculty academic freedom Garcetti case public speech public employee speech
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1沈文钦.美国联邦最高法院的学术自由判例及其法律意涵[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(1):7-11. 被引量:19
  • 2崔吉义,马立武.美国大学教师学术自由的司法保护研究[J].现代教育科学(高教研究),2012(4):123-128. 被引量:4
  • 3林杰,刘萍.美国学术自由的重要判例及意义[J].学园(学者的精神家园),2009(2):31-38. 被引量:4
  • 4Kaplin, William A. The law of high- er education: A Comprehensive Guide to legal implications of administrative decision making M1. San Francisco: Jossey --Bass Publishers, 1995:305.
  • 5Kaplin, William A. The law of high- er education: A Comprehensive Guide to legal implications of administrative decision making M1. San Francisco: Jossey --Bass Publishers, 1995:316.
  • 6Kaplin, William A. The law of high- er education: A Comprehensive Guide to legal implications of administrative decision making M1. San Francisco: Jossey --Bass Publishers, 1995:318.
  • 7Kaplin, William A. The law of high- er education: A Comprehensive Guide to legal implications of administrative decision making M1. San Francisco: Jossey --Bass Publishers, 1995:17.
  • 8Ross, Lauren K. Pursu- ing Academic Freedom After Garceta v. Ceballos [J]. Tex- as Law Review, 2013, (4).. 1253--1281.
  • 9http.. //www. aaup. org/get - involved/issue-- campaigns/speak-- speak-- out-- protect- acuity- voice/legal-- cases-- affecting-- academic.

二级参考文献40

  • 1谢海定.作为法律权利的学术自由权[J].中国法学,2005(6):16-32. 被引量:55
  • 2[荷]亨利·范·马尔赛文.成文宪法的比较研究[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987..
  • 3Burton Clark.The Encyclopedia of Higher Education Oxford:Pergamon Press,1992.1835.
  • 4William W Van Alstyne.Freedom and Tenure in the Academy.Durham:Duke University Press,1993.82.
  • 5Weidlich,Thom.Appointment Denied:the Inquisition of Bertrand Russell.Amherst NY:Prometheus Books,2000.140.
  • 6Hudgins,H.C.Law and Education-Contemporary Issues and Court Decisions.Charlottesville,Va.:Michie Co.,1985:229,234-235,212,221,205-239.
  • 7Baade,Hans W.Academic Freedom:the Scholar's Place in Modern Society.Dobbs Ferry,N.Y.:Oceana Publications,1964.24.
  • 8Morris,Arval A.The Constitution and American Education.St.Paul,Minn.:West Pub.Co.,1980:167-168,169,211-217,221-225.
  • 9Edwards,Harry T.Higher Education and the Law.Cambridge:Institute for Educational Management,Harvard University,1979:171,174,183.
  • 10Walter P.Metzger.The Constitutional Status of Academic Freedom.Arno Press (1977).

共引文献22

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部