期刊文献+

微创极外侧入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的初步应用和早期疗效分析 被引量:10

Minimally invasive extreme lateral interbody fusionfor degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis—preliminary application and early clinical outcome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究微创极外侧入路腰椎椎间融合术(extreme lateral interbody fusion,XLIF)治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的早期疗效和安全性。方法 2013年10月~2014年3月本院收治退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症患者14例,均在微创通道下采用XLIF治疗。分别测量并分析术前、末次随访时患者疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI),椎间高度,椎间孔高度,椎间孔面积和盘黄间隙(关节下间隙),并通过X线片、CT、MRI等影像学资料进行整体评价。结果所有患者手术顺利,术后随访6~13个月,患者均有不同程度的症状改善。5例患者术后出现短暂的右大腿外侧皮肤感觉异常和轻度髂腰肌肌力下降,均在术后2个月内恢复;1例大体重患者术后下床活动时出现持续性腰痛,给予延长卧床休息时间后症状改善。术后影像学显示所有患者椎管及神经根管减压效果满意,滑脱得到一定程度的复位。腰、腿痛VAS评分及ODI均较术前明显改善。术后测量椎间高度增加109.2%;椎间孔高度增加33.8%,症状侧椎间孔面积扩大41.4%,盘黄间隙平均增加2.3 mm。多项影像学评价指标均优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论微创XLIF应用于退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的治疗,可以使患者早期得到良好的症状缓解和满意的影像学改善,值得临床推广与应用。但其远期疗效还需经过大样本长期的随访和研究。 Objective To observe and evaluate the preliminary clinical outcome and safety of minimally invasive extreme lateral interbody fusion( XLIF) for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods From October 2013 to March 2014,14 patients with diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with MIS-XLIF surgery. Visual analogue scale( VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index( ODI) were observed pre-and post-operatively. Also,the pre-and post-operative measurement of disc height( DH),foraminal height( FH),foraminal area( FA),and disk-flavum ligamentum space( DFLS) were compared as well as comprehensive evaluation of the radiography,MRI,and CT images. Results All patients were operated successfully. After 6-13 months follow-up,all patients had different degrees of improvement. Five of the patients( 35. 7%) had a transient paresthesia and mild weekness of muscle unilaterally of the lower limb,however,all of them recovered within 2 months. One case encountered sustained back pain,and alleviated after prolonged rest in bed. The radiographic result showed satisfactory indirect decompression of the neuro-elements,as well as reduction of the lumbar spine.The VAS socres and ODI postoperative both improved compared with the preoperation( P〈0. 01). The DH and FH increased by 109. 2% and 33. 8%,respectively. Symptom-side FA enlarged by 41. 4%,The mean DLFS increased by 2. 3 mm( P〈0. 01). Conclusion The application of minimally invasive XLIF is effective as well as safe for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosies to obtain well release of symptom and satisfactory radiographic improvement,which deserves clinical promotion and application. However,its long-term effect requires more and longer observations and researches.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2015年第4期198-202,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎管狭窄 脊柱融合术 外科手术 微创性 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal stenosis Spinal fusion Surgical procedures Mminimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Wang MY, Vasudevan R, Mindea SA. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostra1 adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21 (6) :861-866.
  • 2何磊,戎利民,董健文,刘斌,陈瑞强,谢沛根,冯丰,杨补.极外侧椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的近期疗效及安全性评价[J].中华骨科杂志,2014,34(1):48-55. 被引量:23
  • 3Costanzo G, Zoccali C, Maykowski P, et al. The rnle of minimally invasive lateral lmnbar interbody fusion in sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23 ( Suppl 6 ) :699-704.
  • 4Malham GM, Ellis N J, Parker RM, et al. Clinical outcome and fusion rates rafter the first 30 extreme lateral interbody fusions [ J ]. Scic World J, 2012:246989.
  • 5Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) :a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. Spine J, 2006, 6 (4) :435-443.
  • 6Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J ]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) :1127-1131.
  • 7Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire [ J ]. Physiotherapy, 1980, 66 ( 8 ) : 271-273.
  • 8Cappuccino A, Cornwall GB, Turner AW, et al. Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(26 Suppl) :S361-367.
  • 9Pimenta L, Turner AW, Dooley ZA, et al. Biomeehanies of lateral interbody spacers : going wider for going stiffer [ J ]. Sei World J, 2012:381814.
  • 10Marehi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, et al. Stand-alone lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Sci World J, 2012:456346.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Rajaraman V,Vingan R,Roth P. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].{H}Journal of Neurosurgery,1999,(1 Suppl):S60-S64.
  • 2Ozgur BM,Aryan HE,Pimenta L. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF):a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J].{H}SPINE JOURNAL,2006,(4):435-443.
  • 3Knight RQ,Schwaegler P,Hanscom D. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions:early complication profile[J].{H}Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques,2009,(1):34-37.
  • 4Arnold PM,Anderson KK,McGuire RA Jr. The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine:a review[J].Surg Neurol Int,2012,(Suppl 3):S198-S215.
  • 5Laws CJ,Coughlin DG,Lotz JC. Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach:an in vitro study[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2012,(10):819-825.
  • 6Benglis DM,Elhammady MS,Levi AD. Minimally invasive anterolateral approaches for the treatment of back pain and adult degenerative deformity[J].{H}NEUROSURGERY,2008,(3 Suppl):S191-S196.
  • 7Rodgers WB,Gerber EJ,Patterson J. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion:an analysis of 600 cases[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2011,(1):26-32.
  • 8Rodgers WB,Cox CS,Gerber EJ. Experience and early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion:XLIF[J].US Musculoskeletal Review,2007,(1):28-32.
  • 9Anand N,Rosemann R,Khalsa B. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis[J].Neurosurg Focus,2010,(3):E6.
  • 10Uribe JS,Arredondo N,Dakwar E. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach:an anatomical study[J].{H}Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine,2010,(2):260-266.

共引文献22

同被引文献96

  • 1张烽,段广超,金国华.下腰椎极外侧椎体间融合术的应用解剖[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(11):859-861. 被引量:14
  • 2Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J ]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) :1127-1131.
  • 3Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire[ J]. Physiotherapy, 1980, 66 ( 8 ) : 271-273.
  • 4MacNab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1971, 53(5) :891-903.
  • 5Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, et al. Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? [J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54(6) :1413-1420.
  • 6Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, et al. Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse [ J ]. Clin J Pain, 2004, 20(6) :455-461.
  • 7Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16 (3) : 431-437.
  • 8Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision ibr lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2002, 27(7) :722-731.
  • 9Benzel EC, Orr RD. A steep learning curve is a good thing! [J]. Spine J, 2011, 11 (2) :131-132.
  • 10Gibson JN, Cowie JG, Iprenburg M. Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery : the future ' gold standard' for disceetomy? -A review[J]. Surgeon, 2012, 10(5):290-296.

引证文献10

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部