期刊文献+

海带和厚叶解曼藻中防污活性物质研究

Exploration of Antifouling Potential of Bioactive Substances of Laminaria and Kjellmaniella crassifolia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选取中肋骨条藻(Keletonema costatum)和东方小藤壶(Hthamalus challengeri)2种典型的污损生物为受试生物,研究了海带(Laminaria)和厚叶解曼藻(Kjellmaniella crassifolia)粗提物的防污活性。抑藻实验结果表明两种海藻粗提物对中肋骨条藻均有较好的抑制效果,其中海带粗提物的抑藻EC50值为(8.9±0.6)μg·mL-1,厚叶解曼藻粗提物的抑藻EC50值为(17.3±1.2)μg·mL-1。藤壶幼虫急性毒性试验表明两种海藻粗提物对东方小藤壶均有较好的致死效果,其中海带粗提物对藤壶幼虫的LC50值为(12.0±1.6)μg·mL-1,厚叶解曼藻粗提物对藤壶幼虫的LC50值为(16.1±2.5)μg·mL-1。两种海藻的粗提物均可作为天然防污剂的潜在来源进行深入研究。 Two seaweeds(Laminaria and Kjellmaniella crassifolia)were explored for the antifouling potentials.Skeletonema costatum and Chthamalus challengeri were used as bioassay organisms.The antialgal experiments revealed that both of the crude extracts fromlaminaria and Kjellmaniella crassifolia could significantly inhibit the growth of the Skeletonema costatum.The EC50 values against Skeletonema costatum were(8.9±0.6)μg·mL-1 for the crude extract fromlaminariaand(17.3±1.2)μg·mL-1 for that from Kjellmaniella crassifolia.The anti-larvae experiments showed a clear dose-response relation between the concentrations of the crude extracts and Chthamalus challengeri larvae lethallty rate.The LC50 values against Chthamalus challengeri larvae were(12.0±1.6)μg·mL-1 for the crude extract from laminariaand(16.1±2.5)μg·mL-1 for that from Kjellmaniellacrassifolia.The results indicated that both of the tow seaweeds could be as a promising source of natural antifouling agents.
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期64-68,共5页 Periodical of Ocean University of China
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41376106) 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2013DM017) 国家科技重大专项项目(2012ZX07501)资助
关键词 海带 厚叶解曼藻 粗提物 天然防污剂 中肋骨条藻 东方小藤壶 Laminaria Kjellmaniella crassifolia crude extract natural antifouling Skeletonema costatum Chthamalus challengeri
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Callow M E, Callow J A. Marine biofouling: A sticky problem [J].Biologist, 2002, 49(1): 1-5.
  • 2Chambers L D, Stokes K R, Walsh F C, et al. Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings[J]. Surface and Coatings Technolo- gy, 2006, 201(6): 3642-3652.
  • 3IW A O O. Organotin antifo uling paints and their altern atives[J]. Applied Organ om etallic Chemistry, 2003, 17(2) : 81-105.
  • 4Antizar-Ladislao B. Environmental levels, toxicity and human ex- posure to tributyltin (TBT)-contaminated marine environment. A review [J]. Environment International, 2008, 34(2): 292-308.
  • 5Champ M A. Economic and environmental impacts on ports and harbors from the convention to ban harmful marine anti-fouling systems [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2003, 46(8) : 935-940.
  • 6于良民,王宝娟,李霞.新型吲哚类防污剂抑菌性能评价[J].涂料工业,2007,37(4):17-20. 被引量:4
  • 7路艳红,李昌诚,于良民,倪春花,张世政.防污剂及防污涂料性能评价方法研究进展[J].上海涂料,2013,51(1):23-28. 被引量:7
  • 8Bhattarai H D, Lee Y K, Cho K H, et al. The study of antagonis- tic interactions among pelagic bacteria: A promising way to coin environmental friendly antifouling compounds [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 568(1): 417-423.
  • 9C De La Broise D, Dufosse L, et aL Inhibition of marine bacteria by extracts of macroalgae: Potential use for environmentally friendly antifouling paints [J]. Marine Environmental Research, 2001, 52(3): 231-247.
  • 10赵金榜.海洋防污剂——从有机锡到无毒高聚物[J].上海涂料,2007,45(10):40-42. 被引量:6

二级参考文献57

共引文献254

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部