期刊文献+

2013年全国175家临床实验室检测抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体的比对分析 被引量:2

Analyses of the Multi-center Comparison of Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies Testing from 175 Laboratories in 2013 in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 通过全国多中心实验室自身抗体检测比对活动,了解国内抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体的检测水平现状,以提高检测质量.方法 由卫生公益性行业科研专项"风湿免疫病诊疗关键技术临床推广及转化应用研究"项目组(以下称"项目组")制备自身抗体比对样品(液体血清),向全国175家自愿报名参加抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体检测的实验室发放比对品.比对品包含抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)阳性或阴性、抗髓过氧化物酶(MPO)抗体阳性或抗蛋白酶3(PR3)抗体阳性,共计1组5支血清.由项目组统一寄送至各实验室.要求各实验室在规定时间内完成检测,并将结果上传至项目组.采用Excel软件对检测结果进行统计分析.结果 参加ANCA,抗MPO抗体及抗PR3抗体检测比对工作的实验室数目分别为134家,148家和148家.ANCA,抗MPO抗体及抗PR3抗体比对品检测结果阳性符合率分别为90.8%,98.0%和98.0%,阴性符合率分别为94.4%,96.1%和98.8%.间接免疫荧光法为国内实验室检测ANCA的主要方法,但回报的结果符合率参差不齐,荧光模型回报率尚不理想,仅为77.9%.结论 2013年全国实验室检测ANCA比对品的阳性符合率尚不理想,且应用ⅡF法检测ANCA时荧光模型回报率不高.抗MPO抗体及抗PR3抗体比对结果较为满意.ANCA检测质量仍有待提高. Objective To survey and analyses the current situation of autoantibodies testing of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic an- tibodies(ANCA) in China for evidence of further improvement of detecting quality. Methods 175 laboratories participated voluntarily in the study of multi-center comparison of ANCA testing. The samples(serum liquid) were prepared by the group of clinical promotion and translation application research of key technology of diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune disea- ses of the Research Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of Health ("the group" for short) ,including 5 ANCA samples, 5 anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibodies samples and 5 anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) antibodies samples,which were mailed to laboratories. The group preformed analysis of the results by Excel,including coincidence rate and titer report rate. Results The laboratories that eventually participated in ANCA, anti-MPO and anti-PR3 were 134,148 and 148, respectively,and the positive coincidence rate were 90.8%, 98.0%and 98.0%, respectively, meanwhile the negative coincidence rate were 94.4 %, 96.1% and 98.8%,respectively. Indirect immunofluorescence(IIF) was the most common method for detection of ANCA. ANCA about the fluoresence pattern were also not ideal and the concordance rate only was 77.9%. Conclusion In 2013, the positive coincidence rate of ANCA is not 'satisfying in clinical labs of China,while the negative coincidence rate was good. IIF method used for idetifying the ANCA fluorescence pattern only got relative low rate of reported results. The coin cidence rate of anti-MPO and anti-PR3 were satisfying in clinical labs of China. In conclusion, detecting quality of ANCA re- mains to be improved.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期137-140,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项“风湿免疫病诊疗关键技术临床推广及转化应用研究”项目(201202004).
关键词 抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA) 抗髓过氧化物酶(MPO)抗体 抗蛋白酶3(PR3)抗体 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies(ANCA) anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibodies anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) antibodies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gadola SD,Gross WL. Vasculitis in 2011..the renais- sance of granulomatous inflammation in AAV[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol,2012,8(2) 74-76.
  • 2Bouzid D, Haddouk S, Amouri A, et .al. Contribution of immunofluorescence to identification and character- ization of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibobies in in- flammatory bowel diseases [J]. Indian J Gastroen- terol,2011,30(5) :229-232.
  • 3曾智杰,孙艳虹,孙丽琴,黄海燕,姜傥.联合使用间接免疫荧光法和酶联免疫吸附法检测抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体结果不一致589例临床分析[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2014,18(4):263-266. 被引量:7
  • 4Tsunekawa S, Arai J, Ishihara Y, et al. MBL quality control survey of autoanitibodies-25 years of activity and its achievement-mainly antinuelear antihodies[J]. Rinsho Byori,2010,58(2) : 131-138.
  • 5Homma S, Matsushita H, Nakata K. Pulmonary fibr- osis in myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides [ J ]. Respirology, 2004,9(2) .. 190-196.
  • 6Kawakami T, Kyoya M, Matsuoka S, et al. Accelera- tion of pulmonary interstitial fibrosis in a patient with myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody- positive erythema elevatum diutinum[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2011,65 (3) : 674-675.
  • 7杨玉芹,张迎梅,王兵.狼疮性肾炎患者抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体的检测及临床意义[J].现代检验医学杂志,2009,24(5):130-131. 被引量:4
  • 8Savige J, Dimech W, Fritzler M, et al. Addendum to the international consensus statement on testing and reporting of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Quality control guidelines, comments, and recommen- dations for testingn other autoimmune diseases[J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2003,120(3) :312-318.
  • 9孙艳艳,胡朝军,康熙雄,张迎久,李晔.抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体IIF法筛查与特异性抗体检测的相互关系及临床意义[J].中华检验医学杂志,2013,36(8):761-763. 被引量:6
  • 10Rao DA, Wei K,Merola JF, et al. Myeloperoxidase- antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (MPO-AN- CA) and proteinase 3-ANCA without immunofluo- rescent ANCA found by routine clinical testing[J]. J Rheumatol, 2015,42 (5) : 847-852.

二级参考文献34

  • 1谌贻璞.系统性疾病继发肾损害狼疮性肾炎[J].医师进修杂志,1994,17(12):1-2. 被引量:2
  • 2王彩虹,李小峰,胡学芳,吕志勤,张琳,王来远.抗蛋白酶-3抗体在韦格纳肉芽肿病和其他血管炎中的临床应用研究[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2006,10(12):738-742. 被引量:8
  • 3Molnar K, Kovacs L, Kiss M, et al. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with systemicclupus erythematosus [J]. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2002,27 (1):59-61.
  • 4Gross W L, Cse mok E. Immumodiagnostic and pathophysiological aspects of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in vasculities [J]. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 1995,7(1 ) : 11-19.
  • 5Manolov L, Dancheva M, Halacheva K. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus : prevalene, antigen Specificity,and clinical associations[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2001,20 (5) : 197-204.
  • 6Chin HJ,Ahn C,Lim CS,et al. Clinical implications of antineutrophrol cytoplasmic antibody test in lupus nephritis[J]. Am J Nephrol , 2000 , 20 (1 ):57-63.
  • 7Chikazawa H, Nishiya K, Matsumori A, et al. Immunoglobulin isotypes of antimyeloperoxidase and anti-lactoferrin antibodies in patients with collagen diseases[J]. J Clin Immunol, 2000,20 (4) : 279-286.
  • 8Schnabel A,Cseronk E, Lsenberg DA,et al. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus : prevalence ,speceficities ,and clinical significance[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995,38(5) :633-637.
  • 9Franssen C F M,Stegen C A,Kallenberg C G M,et al. Antiproteinase 3 and antimyeloperoxidase associated vaseulitis [J]. Kid Intern, 2000, 57 (1) : 2195- 2206.
  • 10Gadola SD, Gross WL. Vasculitis in 2011:the renaissance of granulomatous inflammation in AAV. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2012, 8 : 74 -76.

共引文献13

同被引文献27

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部