期刊文献+

搭售行为的反垄断法分析路径

Analysis Method of Tying on the Antitrust Laws
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在市场竞争中,具有支配地位的经营者为了实现利润最大化,常常利用自己的经济力量实施排除、限制竞争的行为,即所谓的市场支配地位的滥用。搭售是市场支配地位滥用的常见类型,也是反垄断法调整的重点。但搭售行为并非天然违法,其受到反垄断法的禁止需要满足一定的条件:涉嫌经营者在相关市场具有支配地位;该经营者滥用市场支配地位进行搭售;该经营者实施搭售行为没有正当理由。 In order to gain the maximal profits, the enterprises with a dominant market position engage in removing the competition, which is commonly referred to abusing its dominant position. It concluded that tying constitutes abuse of a dominant position and is the focus of the antitrust law. While tying behavior which has no natural illegality is prohibited only for these reasons: the alleged enterprise has a dominance on the relevant market; the enterprise abuses of the dominant position for tying; the absence of an objective justification for the tying practice.
作者 陈娜
机构地区 南开大学
出处 《湖南警察学院学报》 2015年第4期50-57,共8页 Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词 相关市场 市场支配地位 搭售 正当理由 relevant markets market dominance tying objective justification
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Qiang Yu. Technically tying applications to a dominant platform in the software market and competition law [J]. European Competition Law Review, 2015, (4): 160-173.
  • 2Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Grand Chamber) of 17 September 2007. Microsoft Corp. v Commission of the European Communities. Competition-Abuse of dominant position-Client PC operating systems-Work group server operating systems-Streaming media players-Decision finding infringements of Article 82 EC-Refusal of the dominant undertaking to supply and authorise the use of interoperability information-Supply by the dominant undertaking of its client PC operating system conditional on the simultaneous acquisition of its media player-Remedies-Appointment of an independent monitoring trustee - Fine-Determination of the amount-Proportionality. Case T-201/04.
  • 3许光耀.搭售行为的反垄断法分析[J].电子知识产权,2011(11):80-85. 被引量:9
  • 4Maurits Dolmans &Thomas Microsoft's browser choice interoperability undertaking [J]. Graf &David R. Little. commitments and public European Competition LawReview , 2010, (7). 268-275.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部