期刊文献+

基于相对优势的多属性风险决策方法 被引量:1

A Relative Superiority-based Method of Multi-attribute Risk Decision Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对一类多属性风险决策问题,提出一种基于相对优势的方案排序方法。方案之间的优劣关系是方案前景取值和风险2个因素共同作用的结果,因此引入信息熵和标准差作为前景的风险度量,并基于方案之间关于前景期望和风险度量的差异提出相对优势的概念来描述方案之间的优劣程度,根据综合相对优势矩阵可得到决策方案最终的权重向量。算例证明了所提方法的有效性。 A relative superiority-based alternatives ranking method is proposed to solve the type of multi-at- tribute risk decision making problem. The comparison between two alternatives derives from the jointly function of prospects gains/losses and risk, so the information entropy and standard deviation are intro- duced and taken as the risk measurements for the prospect, then the concept of relative superiority based on the difference of expected utility and risk measurements between the two alternatives is proposed to de- pict the relative superiority degree. And the weight vector and preference rank of all the alternatives can surface from the matrix of comprehensively relative superiority. The cases show that the proposed method is effective.
出处 《空军工程大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期88-92,共5页 Journal of Air Force Engineering University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 多属性风险决策 风险度量 相对优势 multi-attribute risk decision making relative superiority risk measurements
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Schmidt U, Starmer C, Sugden R. Third-generation prospect theory[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2008,36(3) : 203-223.
  • 2Chris Starmer. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, 38(2) :332-382.
  • 3Sun Bingzhen, Ma Weimin, Zhao Haiyan. A Fuzzy Rough Set Approach to Emergency Material Demand Prediction Over two Universes[J]. Applied Mathe- matical Modeling, 2013, 37(10-11):7062-7070.
  • 4Risto Lahdelma, Pekka Salminen. Prospect Theory and Stochastic Mu|tieriteria Acceptability Analysis [J]. Omega, 2009, 37(5):961-971.
  • 5胡军华,周益文.基于前景理论的多准则决策方法[C].2009年中国控制与决策会议论文集.桂林,2009:2930-2935.
  • 6马健,孙秀霞,郭创.基于风险-效益比和前景理论的风险性多属性决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2011,33(11):2434-2439. 被引量:8
  • 7潘寒尽,张多林,方冬进,司维.模糊聚类与信息熵综合评价法在防空C^3I系统中的应用[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2006,7(5):19-21. 被引量:3

二级参考文献21

  • 1陈绍顺,宁伟华,张琳.防空战斗中的态势评估模型[J].空军工程大学学报(自然科学版),2004,5(4):29-33. 被引量:11
  • 2王美乂,张凤鸣,刘智.模糊信息的熵权多属性决策方案评估方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(10):1523-1525. 被引量:37
  • 3Neumann V M. Theory of games and economic behavior[M]. United States : Princeton University Press, 1944.
  • 4Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  • 5Kahraman C, Cebi S. A new muluattribute decision making method., hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design[J]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2009,36(3):4848 - 4861.
  • 6Fan Z P, Feng B. A multiple attributes decision making method using individual and collaborative attribute data in a fuzzy environment[J]. Information Science ,2009,179(20):3603 - 3618.
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometric, 1979,47(2) :263 - 291.
  • 8Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[J]. Science, 1981,211(2) :453 - 480.
  • 9Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 1992,5 (4) : 297 - 323.
  • 10Kahneman D , Tversky A . Choices , values and frames[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

共引文献10

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部