《我国大学生学习投入度调查问卷》设计与检验——基于“国家大学生学习情况调查”数据分析被引量：17

The Research on the Development of The College Student Engagement Questionnaire——Based on the Data Analysis of " National College Students' Learning Situation Investigation"

下载PDF

导出

摘要学习投入度调查是评价大学生学业成就的有效方法。《我国大学生学习投入度调查问卷》从行为、认知和情感这三个维度来编制。通过使用大规模调查数据对问卷进行信度和效度检验发现:调查问卷由"行为投入度"、"认知投入度"和"情感投入度"等三个因子构成;调查问卷的开发建立在扎实的理论基础之上,兼具国际化特征和本地化特色;问卷中"三因子模型"具有较好的信效度,为日后开展相关研究提供了科学的本土化研究工具。 College student engagement means that students study with behavioral, emotional and cognitive engagement during their four years in the college. The College Student Engagement Questionnaire is divided into three dimensions based on this conception. The research result shows the questionnaire has three factors. These factors are the behavioral engagement, the cognitive engagement and the emotional engagement. The result also shows the validity and reliability of the questionnaire are good, and the questionnaire is a local tool to measure the college student engagement in China.

作者汪雅霜

机构地区南京大学教育研究院

出处《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》 2015年第3期101-106,共6页 Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

基金全国教育科学"十二五"规划2014年教育部青年课题(EIA140398)

关键词大学生学习投入度问卷开发信效度检验学情调查 college student student engagement questionnaire development validity and reliability test student survey

分类号 G640 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Hu S. , Mccormicr A.. An Engagement-Based Student Typol- ogy and Its Relationship to College Outcomes[J]. Research in Higher Education, 2012, (53).
2Kuh G.. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Con- ceptual and Empirical Foundations[J]. New Directions for In- stitutional Research, 2009, (141).
3Carini R., Kuh G., Klein S.. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2006, 47 ( 1 ).
4龚放,吕林海.中美研究型大学本科生学习参与差异的研究——基于南京大学和加州大学伯克利分校的问卷调查[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(9):90-100. 被引量：71
5涂冬波,史静寰,郭芳芳.中国大学生学习性投入调查问卷的测量学研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2013,11(1):55-62. 被引量：53
6Fredrick S J. , Blumenfel D P. , Paris A.. School Engage- ment: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence[J]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74 ( 1 ).
7Jimerson S. , Campos E. , Greif J.. Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Relat- ed Terms [J]. California School Psychologist, 2003, (8).
8Fredrieks J.. The Measurement of Student Engagement= A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self- report Instruments. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,2012.
9Mccormick A. , KINZIE J. , GONYEA R.. Student Engage- ment: Bridging Research and Practice to Improve the Quality of Undergraduate Education[J]. Handbook of Theory and Research, 2013, (28).
10Appleton J. , Christensona S. , Kima D. , Reschlyb A.. Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Valida- tion of the Student Engagement Instrument [J].Journal of School Psychology, 2006, (44).

二级参考文献69

1Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
2Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
3Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
4Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
5Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).
6Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & MaCune, V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000, ( 1 ).
7Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. 'Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…' Changes in Chinese University students' views of the temporal structure of learning [J]. Higher Education, 2005, (3).
8Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty. E. Conceptions of learning [J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, (19).
9Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in ihigher education: The course experience questionnaire [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1991, i2).
10Marton, F., & Saljo, R. On qualitative differences in learning I - Outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, ( 1 ).