期刊文献+

不同水平英语专业学习者口语产出的认知差异

English Majors' Cognitive Differences in Oral English Output
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验和回顾访谈的方法,对60位英语专业学习者英语口语产出中的认知差异进行分析。研究发现:三组被试在答题过程中的认知差异体现在:高水平组主要是编码、比较和目标定向;中水平组主要是比较、编码和目标定向;低水平组主要是联结和比较;三组被试在口语产出过程中关注重点不同:高水平组关注得体表达和交流环境;中水平组关注语法和练习;低水平组侧重词汇和语音;高水平组能较好进行自我监控和目标定向;中低水平组则均不能较好地监控产出结果,侧重于通过母语思维、英语翻译的表达方式。 By collecting empirical corpus and results of individual interviews, this study aims at examining 60 English majors' cognitive differences in oral English output. The findings are as follows :The cognitive process of high-level group is mainly encoding, comparison and goal orientation;medium-level group is mainly comparison, encoding and goal orientation;and low-level group is mainly connection and compari- son. High-level group pay more attention to authentic expression and communication environment;medi- um-level group focus on grammar and practice;low-level students focus on vocabulary and pronunciation. High-level group have a better use of self-monitoring and goal orientation. Neither medium-level group nor low-level group can monitor output results properly, mainly relying on thinking in Chinese and translating in English.
作者 李庆照
出处 《蚌埠学院学报》 2015年第5期107-111,共5页 Journal of Bengbu University
基金 国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题(CHA140176)
关键词 英语专业 口语产出 认知差异 English majors oral output cognitive difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1孙若红.基于认知策略的英语专业口语教学[J].现代教育管理,2011(2):84-86. 被引量:4
  • 2Ellis R. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994:517 -526.
  • 3Scovel T. Psycholinguistics [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press,2000 : 39 - 47.
  • 4Sternberg R J, Davidson J E. Insight in the gifted educa- tional psychologist [ J ]. Educational Psychologist, 1983,18 (1) :51 -57.
  • 5Lawson M J, Chinnappan M. Generative activity during ge- ometry problem solving:comparison of performance of high - achieving and low - achieving high school students [ J ]. Cognition and Instruction, 1994,12 ( 1 ) :61 - 93.
  • 6Holyoak K J, Koh K. Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer [ J ]. Memory and Cognition, 1987, 15 (4) :332 -340.
  • 7Schoenfeld A H. Models of teaching process [ J ]. The Journal Mathematical Behavior,2000(18) :243-261.
  • 8李庆照,毛浩然.大学英语中等生与学困生口语输出的认知差异[J].宿州学院学报,2014,29(7):123-126. 被引量:1
  • 9百度百科.大学英语口语[EB/OL].[2012-12-25].http://baike.baidu.com/view/1248691.htm.

二级参考文献19

  • 1隋秀芝.关注“中等生”[J].文教资料,2006(4):130-131. 被引量:2
  • 2裴利芳.学习困难学生的认知因素分析[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(4):12-16. 被引量:48
  • 3王苏 汪安圣.认知心理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1993..
  • 4加涅.学习的条件与教学论[M].皮连生等译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
  • 5O'Malley, J.M., A.U.Chamot.Leaming Strategies in Second Language Acquisition [M].Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2001.
  • 6Oxford, R.L.Language Learning Strategies [M ].New York :Newbury House Publishers, 1990.
  • 7Cohen, A.D.Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language [ M ].London : Longman, 1998.
  • 8杨光伟,范劲松.中等生与学困生解决故事问题的认知差异[J].心理科学,2007,30(5):1104-1106. 被引量:3
  • 9Swain M. Three Functions of Output in Second I.anguage Learning[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 10Scovel T. Psyeholinguistics[M]. Oxford : Oxford Universi- ty Press, 2000.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部