期刊文献+

基于状态监测数据的电器电接触性能评估 被引量:9

Performance Assessment Based on Condition Monitoring Data of Electrical Contact of Electrical Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于概率统计理论的传统可靠性评估方法得到的是批量产品整体的可靠性水平,较强依赖于寿命数据,对于产品运行可靠性进行评估并不适宜。这里以电磁继电器为例,给出一种基于状态监测数据和整体寿命数据的性能评估方法。根据电接触检测试验得到触点接触电阻状态监测数据和继电器的寿命数据,对继电器寿命分布进行检验,确定继电器寿命分布为威布尔分布;以接触电阻为模型协变量,以威布尔分布为继电器失效分布类型,计算继电器基准故障率函数,采用极大似然估计法对模型参数进行估计,建立继电器威布尔比例故障率性能评估模型。在此基础上,给出继电器监测间隔动态预测方法。实例分析表明,该方法对继电器进行性能评价是有效的,可为器件更换、系统维护决策提供支持。 The result obtained from traditional reliability evaluation methods is the overall level of a collection of electrical products which mainly based on probability and statistics theory,strongly relying on lifetime data,and not suit for operating reliability evaluation.Electromagnetic relay,for example,a performance assessment method based on condition monitoring data and overall lifetime data is proposed.Calculate the baseline hazard rate function according to contact status monitoring and lifetime data from the electrical contact test and determined Weibull distribution as relay's lifetime distribution after fitting test.Taking contact resistance and Weibull distribution as model covariate and baseline hazard rate function form respectively.Model parameters could be obtained by maximum likelihood estimation method.Weibull proportional hazards model for performance evaluation for relays is established and monitoring interval dynamic prediction method is presented on this basis.Application example is given to verify the effectiveness of this method,providing support for devices change and maintenance decision.
出处 《机械工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第18期198-203,共6页 Journal of Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(51377044 51475136) 河北省高等学校创新团队领军人才培育计划(LJRC003) 河北省自然科学基金(E2014202230)资助项目
关键词 电磁继电器 状态监测 比例故障率模型 威布尔分布 性能评估 electromagnetic relays status monitoring proportional hazards model(PHM) Weibull distribution performance assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1LAWLESS J F. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data[M]. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons 2003.
  • 2COX D R. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion)[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 1972, 34(2): 187-220.
  • 3WIGHTMAN D W, BENDELL A. The practical application of proportional hazards modeling[J]. Reliability Engineering, 1986, 15(1): 29-53.
  • 4丁锋,何正嘉,訾艳阳,陈雪锋,曹宏瑞,谭继勇.基于设备状态振动特征的比例故障率模型可靠性评估[J].机械工程学报,2009,45(12):89-94. 被引量:49
  • 5ANUPAMA T, DILIP R. Estimation of reliability of mobile handsets using Cox-proportional hazard model[Y]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2013, 53(3): 481-487.
  • 6YOU Mingyi, L1U Fu, MENG Guang. Proportional hazards model for reliability analysis of solder joints under various drop-impact and vibration conditions[Y]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2012, 226(2): 194-202.
  • 7REN Wanbin, WANG Peng, SONG Jian, et al. Effects of current load on wear and fretting corrosion of gold-plated electrical contacts[J]. Tribology International, 2014(70): 75 -82.
  • 8M, NEUHAUS A R, RIEDER W E The effects of material transfer in relays diagnosed by force and or voltage measurement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, 2004, 27(1): 12-18.
  • 9OSTENDORF D F, WlELSCH T , REINIGER D M. Reliability assessment and field failure predictions: A prognostic model for separable electrical contacts[C]//27th International Conference on Electrical Contacts, June 22-26, 2014, International Congress Center Dresden, Detmold, Germany, 2014: 278-283.
  • 10DHANANJAY K, BENGT K. Proportional hazards model: A review[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1994,44(2): 177-188.

二级参考文献31

  • 1JARDINE A K S, LIN D, BANJEVIC D. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(7): 1 483-1 510.
  • 2HESS S M, BITER W J, HOLLINGSWORTH S D. An evaluation method for application of cond/tion-based maintenance technologies[C]//IEEE Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2001: 240-245.
  • 3SARANGA H, KNEZEVIC J. Reliability prediction for condition-based maintained systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 71(2): 219-224.
  • 4LIAO Haitao, ZHAO Wenbiao, GUO Huairui. Predicting remaining useful life of an individual unit using proportional hazards model and logistic regression model[C]// IEEE Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006: 127-132.
  • 5CHINNAM R B. On-line reliability estimation of individual components using degradation signal models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1999, 48(4): 403-412.
  • 6LU H, KOLARIK W J, LU S S. Real-time performance reliability rrediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2001, 50(4): 353-357.
  • 7LU S S, LU H, KOLARIK W J. Multivariate performance reliability prediction in real-time[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 72 (1): 39-45.
  • 8LIN Changching, TSENG Hsienyu. A neural network application for reliability modeling and condition-based predictive maintenance[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 25(1): 174-179.
  • 9YONG Suna, LIN Maa, JOSEPH Mathew, et al. Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006, 20(5): 1 189-1 201.
  • 10COX D R. Regression models and life-tables(with discussion)[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 1972, 34(2): 187-220.

共引文献48

同被引文献66

引证文献9

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部