期刊文献+

护理干预对冠心病患者心理状态、领悟社会支持能力及生活质量的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Nursing Intervention on Psychological State, Social Support Perception and Life Quality of the Patients with Coronary Heart Disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨护理干预对冠心病患者心理状态、领悟社会支持能力及生活质量的影响。方法选择冠心病患者110例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组(n=55)和对照组(n=55),对照组给予常规治疗护理,观察组在此基础上加用特定护理干预措施,观察2组患者焦虑、自尊、领悟社会支持能力和生活质量的变化。结果护理干预后观察组在焦虑、自尊、领悟社会支持能力和生活质量的改善方面优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论护理干预可缓解冠心病患者的焦虑情绪,增强自尊感,提高领悟社会支持的能力,改善生活质量。 Objective To observe the effect of nursing intervention on psychological state,social support perception and life quality of the patients suffering from coronary heart disease(CHD). Methods 110 patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group(55 cases in each group). The control group received routine treatment,and the observation group received nursing intervention,and the changes of anxiety,self-esteem,social support perception and life quality in both groups were observed. Results After nursing intervention,the observation group was superior to the control group obviously in anxiety,self-esteem,social support perception and life quality,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention could relieve the anxiety of the patients,enhance selfesteem,improve social support perception and life quality.
作者 王新敏
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2015年第27期195-196,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 冠心病 心理 领悟社会支持能力 生活质量 护理干预 Coronary heart disease Psychology Social support perception Life quality Nursing intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献79

  • 1于肖楠,张建新.D型人格量表(DS14)在中国两所大学生样本中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(5):313-316. 被引量:96
  • 2吴文源.焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale SAS).中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:235-238.
  • 3舒良.抑郁自评量表(Self-Rating Depression Scale SDS)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13:194-196.
  • 4Manrique-Garcia E, Sidorchuk A, Hallqvist J, et al. Socioeconomic position and incidence of acute myocardial infarction: a recta-analysis. JEpidemial Community Heahh,2011, 65 : 301-309.
  • 5Marmot MG, Shipley M J, Hemingway H, et al. Biological and behavioural explanations of social inequalities in coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia, 2008, 51: 1980- 1988.
  • 6Steptoe A, Hamer M, O'Donnell K, et at. Socioeconomic status and subclinical coronary disease in the Whitehall H epidemiological study. PLoS One,2010, 25, 5 : e8874.
  • 7Korda RJ, Clements MS, Dixon J. Socioeconomic inequalities in the diffusion of health technology: Uptake of coronary procedures as an example. Soc Sci Med, 2011, 72: 224-229.
  • 8Niu S, Zhao D, Zhu J, et al. The association between socioeconomic status of high-risk patients with coronary heart disease and the treatment rates of evidence-based medicine for coronary heart disease secondary prevention in China: results from the bridging the gap on CHD secondary prevention in China (BRIG) Project. Am Heart J, 2009, 157:709-715.
  • 9Kuper H, Marmot M, Hemingway H. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies of psychosocial factors in the etiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Semin Vasc Med, 2002, 2: 267 -314.
  • 10Hintsanen M, Kivimaki M, Elovainio M, et al. Job strain and early atherosclerosis: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. Psychosom Med, 2005, 67: 740-747.

共引文献66

同被引文献63

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部