期刊文献+

Sustainability and Public Engagement in Mining: The Role of Engineers

Sustainability and Public Engagement in Mining: The Role of Engineers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Social issues are increasingly recognized as significant inhibitors to mineral development projects. Increasingly, social risk is being recognized as a key factor determining the success of a mineral investment. Groups opposed to a mine for social or political reasons otten use environmental impacts, real or perceived, to prevent mine development. These risk factors depend largely on cultural perceptions of mining activities and must be understood as such in order to be appropriately managed. A first step to addressing social issues is inclusive, transparent and meaningful engagement of stakeholders. This process allows stakeholders to understand what the other parties value in order to collectively establish a common currency for development and the creation of mutual value. Expanding the scope of benefits and values a mine can bring is of increasing importance to mining companies who typically consult outside specialists remote from the mine site and late in the development timeline for this purpose. Training technical staff, engineers and geologists, who make initial and ongoing contact with local interests, in a holistic approach to mine development is crucial to successful and economic mineral development projects. Further extending this conversation to the genera/ public, media governments and non-govemmental organizations is a necessary step in developing a meaningful discourse on the benefit of mining activities.
出处 《Journal of Earth Science and Engineering》 2015年第5期280-288,共9页 地球科学与工程(英文版)
关键词 Social issues in mining mining and society public engagement sustainability of mining. 公众参与 矿业可持续发展 工程师 利益相关者 非政府组织 矿产开发 社会问题 矿山开发
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Davis, R., and Franks, D. M. 2011. "The Costs of Conflict with Local Communities in the Extractive Industry." In Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Social Responsibility in Mining, Santiago, Chile, Vol. 30.
  • 2Auty, R. M. 1993. "Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies." The Resource Curse thesis, London, Routledge, 272.
  • 3Moyo, D. 2009. Dead Aid." Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is Another Way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 209.
  • 4Gjessing, O. P. K., and Syse, H. 2007. "Norwegian Petroleum Wealth and Universal Ownership." Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (3): 427-37.
  • 5Murphy, R. P. 2013. Reforming Alberta's Heritage Fund." Lessons from Alaska and Norway. Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 47.
  • 6Owen, J. R., and Kemp, D. 2012. "Assets, Capitals, and Resources: Frameworks for Corporate Community Development in Mining." Business & Society 51 (3): 382-408.
  • 7Moffat, K., and Zhang, A. 2014. "The Paths to Social Licence to Operate: An Integrative Model Explaining Community Acceptance of Mining." Resources Policy 39 61-70.
  • 8Evans, M. 2012. Canadian Riean Legal Storm. Mining Company in Costa Costa Rica Star. http://news.co.cr/canadian-mining-company-in-costa-rica n-legal-storm/16674/Accessed April 19, 2014.
  • 9Jaccard, H., and Condon, G. 2013. Guatemalans Resist Invasion of North American Mines. www.globalresearch.ca/guatemalans-resist-invasion-of-n orth-american-mines/5318080.
  • 10Accessed April 14, 2014. CEAA. 2013. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Report of the Federal Review Panel-New Prosperity Gold/Copper Mine Project. Oct 31, 2013.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部