期刊文献+

氟西汀与艾司西酞普兰对大鼠抑郁样行为及海马BDNF基因表达的影响 被引量:12

Effects of fluoxetine and escitalopram on depressive-like behavior and hippocampal BDNF gene expression in adult rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的考察氟西汀及艾司西酞普兰不同的使用时程对大鼠抑郁样行为及海马脑源性神经营养因子(brainderivedneurotrophicfactor,BDNF)表达水平的影响。方法96只sD大鼠采用随机数字表法随机分为12组,每组8只:(1)M1组:正常对照1周;(2)M2组:CUMS+生理盐水1周;(3)M3组:CUMS+氟西汀1周;(4)M4组:CUMS+艾司西酞普兰1周;(5)M5组:正常对照2周;(6)M6组:CUMS+生理盐水2周;(7)M7:CUMS+氟西汀2周;(8)M8组:CUMS+艾司西酞普兰2周;(9)M9组:正常对照3周;(10)M10组:CUMS+生理盐水3周;(11)M11组:CUMS+氟西汀3周;(12)M12组:CUMS+艾司西酞普兰3周。造模后M2、M6、MIO组大鼠腹腔注射生理盐水,M3、M7、M11组大鼠腹腔注射氟西汀,M4、M8、M12组大鼠腹腔注射艾司西酞普兰。1周后,M1、M2、M3、M4组大鼠行旷场实验及糖水偏好实验,实时荧光定量PCR方法检测BDNF基因表达。2周后,M5、M6、M7、M8组行相同操作。3周后,M9、M10、M11、M12组行相同操作。结果在旷场实验中,M1组[(3925.70±322.32)cm]与M3组[(1841.85±786.33)cm],M6组[(1820.31±296.00)cm]与M8组[(4002.72±1447.19)cm],M10组[(1961.66±919.16)cm]与M11组[(3741.72±1064.46)cm]、M10组[(1961.66±919.16)cm]与M12组[(4280.43±1187.05)cm]间10min总行程差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。在糖水偏好实验中,M2组[(56.23±7.49)%]与M4组[(70.55±4.96)%],M6组[(60.22±8.81)%]与M8组[(75.08±4.15)%],M10组[(60.26±7.20)%]与M11组[(73.88±7.73)%]、M10组[(60.26±7.20)%]与M12组[(73.52±7.58)%]间糖水偏好率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。M2组(0.66±0.14)与M4组(1.15-0.20),M10组(0.90±0.15)与M11组(1.22±0.09)、M10组(0.90±0.15)与M12组(1.48±0.20)间BDNF基因相对表达量差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论氟西汀与艾司西酞普兰使用3周后均能改善大鼠抑郁样行为,并提高海马中BDNFmRNA的表达。艾司西酞普兰在治疗抑郁症方面起效时间更快,可能与BDNFmRNA的表达快速增高有关。 Objective To investigate the effects of different duration of fluoxetine and escitalopram ad- ministration on depressive-like behavior and hippoeampal BDNF expression in adult rats. Methods Ninety-six SD rats were randomly divided into twelve groups : ( 1 ) M1 group : normal control for one week, (2) M2 group : CUMS +saline for one week, (3) M3 group : CUMS+fluoxetine for one week, (4) M4 group : CUMS+escitalopram for one week, (5) M5 group : normal control for two weeks, (6) M6 group : CUMS + saline for two weeks, ( 7 ) M7 group : CUMS+fluoxetine for two weeks, (8)M8 group: CUMS+escitalopram for two weeks, (9)M9 group: normal control for three weeks, (10) M10 group: CUMS+saline for three weeks, ( 11 ) Mll group: CUMS+fluoxetine for three weeks, (12) M8 group: CUMS+escitalopram for three weeks. After CUMS procedures,rats in M2 group, M6 group and M10 group were injected with saline, M3 group, M7 group and Mll group were injeeted with fluoxetine, and rats in M4 group,M8 group,M12 group were injected with escitalopram. After one week of intervention,the openfield test and 1% sucrose preference test were performed to evaluate depression-like behaviors in rats of M1 group, M2 group, M3 group and M4 group. After behavior test, rats were sacrificed and the hippocampi were isolated. The expression of BDNFmRNA was detected by using real-time quantitative PCR. After two weeks of intervention,rats in M5 group, M6 group, M7 group and M8 group underwent the same behavioral. After three weeks of intervention, rats in M9 group, M10 group, M ll group and M12 group underwent the same behavioral test. Results In the open-field test,total distance travelled in 10 minutes was significant difference among the following groups: M1 groun ( (3925.70±322.323 era) vs group ( (1841.85±786.33) em) ,M6 group ( (1820.31±296.00) em) vsM8 group ((4002.72±1447.19) cm) ,MIO ( (1961.66±919.16) era) group vs M11 group ((3741.72±1064.46) cm) ,MIO group ( (1961.66±919.16) cm) vs M12 group ((4280.43±1187.05) cm).In the 1% sucrose preference test, the difference of sucrose preference consumption was statistically significant (P〈 0. 05 ) among the following groups: M2 group ((56.23±7.49)%) vs M4 group ((70.55±4.96)%) ,M6 group ((60.22±8.81)%) vs M8 group ((75.08±4.15)%),MIO group ((60.26±7.20)%) vs Mll group ((73.88±7.73)%),MIO group ((60.26 ± 7.20) % ) vs M 12 group ( ( 73.52 ± 7.58 ) % ). The expression level of BDNF was significant difference among these groups: M2 group (0.66±0.14) vs M4 group (1.15±0.20) ,M10 group (0.90±0.15) vs Mll group ( 1.22± 0.09) ,M10 group (0.90±0.15) vs M12 group (1.48±0.20). Conelusioia Both of fluoxetine and escitalopram can improve depression-like behaviors in rats and significantly increase the expression of the hippoeampal BDNFmRNA. Compared with fluoxetine, escitalopram has a shorter onset time in the treatment of depression. It may be related with a rapid increase of the expression of BDNF mRNA.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期865-868,共4页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81201058) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BA101805)
关键词 氟西汀 艾司西酞普兰 抑郁 环磷酸腺苷反应元件结合蛋白 脑源性神经营养因子 Fluoxetine Escitalopram Depression Cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein Brain derived neurotrophic factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献39

  • 1杨志寅.现代医学科学发展中的缺憾与思考[J].中华诊断学电子杂志,2013,1(1). 被引量:100
  • 2于德华,吴文源,张明园.上海市综合医院精神卫生服务现状调查[J].中华精神科杂志,2004,37(3):176-178. 被引量:21
  • 3周敏娟,姚立旗.综合医院心理疾患的误诊资源浪费情况及影响因素[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(2):174-175. 被引量:29
  • 4吴绍敏,于德华,吴萍,李春波.非精神科医师对精神障碍处理现状调查[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(1):6-7. 被引量:17
  • 5Rodgers M, Asaria M, Walker S, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression : a systematic review. Health Technol Assess ,2012,16 : 1-130.
  • 6Forbes EE,Dahl RE. Research review:altered reward function in ado- lescent depression:what,when and how. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2012,53:3-15.
  • 7Lotrich FE, E1-Gabalawy H, Guenther LC, et al. The role of inflamma- tion in the pathophysiology of depression : different treatments and their effects. J Rheumatol Suppl,2011,88 :48-54.
  • 8Steptoe A, Hamer M, Chida Y. The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating inflammatory factors in humans:a review and me- ta-atalysis. Brain Behav Immun,2007,21:901-912.
  • 9Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, bwardtager W, et al. A meta-analysis of cyto- kines in nmjor depression. Biol Psychiatry,2010,67:446-457.
  • 10Schutter DJ,van Honk J. A framework for targeting alternative brain regions with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treat- ment of depression. J Psychiatry Neurosci,2005,30:91-97.

共引文献79

同被引文献128

  • 1夏军,陈军,周义成,张景峰,杨波,夏黎明,王承缘.抑郁症患者海马及杏仁核容积异常的MRI研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):140-143. 被引量:36
  • 2姚素艳,张宝云,郑德宇,金英,刘卓.中药当归主要活性成分阿魏酸钠抑制淀粉样β蛋白激活炎症因子的量剂反应[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):134-136. 被引量:12
  • 3金晶,彭颖,李晓波.快速提取肠道微生物基因组DNA的方法[J].现代生物医学进展,2007,7(1):100-103. 被引量:27
  • 4康平,朱海清,胡军.脑梗死后抑郁症药物治疗及其对神经功能康复影响的临床观察[J].中国医药,2007,2(9):543-544. 被引量:6
  • 5Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Norman GJ, et al. Social isolation [ J ]. Ann N Y Acad Sci ,2011,1231 : 17-22.DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632. 2011.06028.x.
  • 6Chaby LE, Cavigelli SA, Hirrlinger AM, et al. Chronic stress during adolescence impairs and improves learning and memory in adult- hood[ J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2015,9: 327. DOI: 10.3389/fn- beh.2015.00327, eCollection 2015.
  • 7Briones A, Gagno S, Martisova E, et al. Stress-induced anhedonia is associated with an increase in Alzheimer's disease-related markers [ J ]. Br J Pharmacol, 2012, 165 ( 4 ) : 897-907. DOI : 10.1111/j. 1476-5381.2011.01602.x.
  • 8Zhang LF, Shi L, Liu H, et al.Increased hippocampal tau phospho- rylation and axonal mitochondrial transport in a mouse model of chronic stress[ J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol,2012,15(3) :337- 348.DOI : 10.1017/S1461145711000411.
  • 9Nelson RL, Guo Z, Halagappa VM, et al. Prophylactic treatment with paroxetine ameliorates behavioral deficits and retards the de- velopment of amyloid and tau pathologies in 3xTgAD mice [ J ] .Exp Neurol,2007,205 ( 1 ) : 166-176. DOI : 10.1016/j. expneurol, 2007, 01,037.
  • 10Marlatt MW, Potter MC, Bayer TA, et al. Prolonged running, not fluoxetine treatment, increases neurogenesis, but does not alter neu- ropathology in the 3xTg mouse model of Alzheimer "s disease [ J ]. Curr Top Behav Neurosci,2013,15 : 313-340. DOI: 10.1007/7854 _2012_237.

引证文献12

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部