摘要
目的:比较渗透树脂(ICON)、流动树脂(Z350)、窝沟封闭剂3种树脂材料对早期釉质龋表面的处理效果。方法:选取新鲜拔除的牛切牙60个,模拟体外建立早期釉质龋模型后随机分为A、B、C、D 4组(n=15);其中A、B、C组分别用渗透树脂、Z350流动树脂及窝沟封闭剂进行处理,D组不作任何处理用于对照。处理结束后,分别测量各组样本表面的粗糙度、显微硬度及树脂的渗透深度。结果:各组样本表面粗糙度由高到低以此为:D组>B组>A组>C组,各组间相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组样本表面显微硬度由高到低以此为:A组>B组>C组>D组,各组间相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组对树脂的渗透百分比由高到低依次为:A组>B组>C组>D组,各组间相比,除B组和C组无统计学差异(P>0.05)外,其余各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:早期釉质龋样本经上述3种树脂处理后,其表面粗糙以窝沟封闭剂最低;表面显微硬度以渗透树脂最高,其树脂树脂渗透百分比高于Z350流动树脂及窝沟封闭剂。
AIM: To investigate the effects of infiltration resin ICON,flow resin Z350 and fissure sealant3 M on on early enamel caries. METHODS: 60 freshly extracted bovine teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups( n = 15) after artificial enamel caries had been built. The samples were treated with ICON( group A),Z350( group B) and 3M( groups C) respectively,those in Group D received no treatmentad the controls. Enamel surface roughness,micro hardness and percentage of penetration were measured. RESULTS: Enamel roughness value was in the following order; group D 〉group B 〉group A 〉group C,( between each 2 groups,P〈0. 05); micro hardness value: group A 〉group B〉 group C〉 group D,( between each 2 groups,P〈0. 05); percentage of penetration depth were: group A〉 group B 〉group C 〉group D( between each 2 groups,P〈0. 05 except group B vs. group C).CONCLUSION: When applied on artificial enamel lesions,fissure sealant may produce the lowest surface roughness value. ICON may produce the highest micro hardness and percentage of the penetration value.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
2015年第10期592-595,共4页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金
河北省科研厅科技支撑计谋项目(11246126D)