期刊文献+

改良的心血管健康行为和因素评分与老年人短时收缩压变异性的关系 被引量:7

Relationship Between Improved Cardiovascular Health Behavior Score and Short-time Systemic Blood Pressure Variability in Elder Population
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨改良的美国心脏协会(AHA)心血管健康行为和因素评分对开滦研究中部分老年人群短时收缩压变异性(SBPV)的影响。方法:抽取开滦总医院、开滦林西医院、开滦赵各庄医院离退休职工中年龄≥60岁、无心脏瓣膜病、心肌病、频发早搏、心房颤动、房室及室内传导阻滞等疾病,2周内未服用抗精神病药物、帕金森治疗药物、抗抑郁症药物及镇静止痛药物者2 464例组成研究队列,进一步行24 h动态血压监测。采用24 h、日间和夜间收缩压标准差作为24 h、日间和夜间SBPV。用多元线性回归分析改良的心血管健康行为和因素评分对24 h、日间和夜间SBPV的影响。改良的心血管健康行为和因素是指:将2010年AHA提出的7项指标中的蔬菜摄入量改为食盐摄入量;体重指数(BMI)界限值采用《中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南》提出的中国成人超重和肥胖BMI界限值参考标准;有关运动的定义也与AHA的定义略有不同,本研究采用的标准为理想运动量≥80 min/周,一般为〈80 min/周,差为从不运动。结果:最终纳入分析的研究对象1 812例,按改良的心血管健康行为和因素评分分组:第一组(0-4分,n=56)、第二组(5-9分,n=1 600)、第三组(10-14分,n=156);三组对应的24 h、日间和夜间SBPV分别为16.02 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、14.91 mmHg和13.18 mmHg,15.42 mmHg、14.50 mmHg和13.22 mmHg,12.68 mmHg、11.44mmHg和10.16 mmHg(P均〈0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,校正混杂因素后,改良的心血管健康行为评分每增加1分,24 h、日间和夜间SBPV分别降低0,20 mmHg、0.19 mmHg和0.37 mmHg(P均〈0.05)。结论:改良的心血管健康行为和因素评分与老年人短时SBPV呈明显的负相关关系。 Objective: To investigate the impact of improved AHA cardiovascular health behavior score (CHS) on short-timesystemic blood pressure variability (SBPV) in elder population. Methods: A total of 2464 participants 〉_ 60 years from 3 hospitals of Kailuan area were taken for cohort study. The participants had no cardiovascular disease, not taking anti-psychotic drug, Parkinson treatment drug, anti-depression drug and analgesic drug within 2 weeks. All participants received 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the 24-hour, day-time, night-time SBPV were defined by the standard deviation of 24-hour, day-time, night-time systolic blood pressure. The influence of CHS on SBPV was studied by multi-linear regression analysis. Improved cardiovascular health behavior and factors implied as changing the vegetable intake amount to salt amount by American Humane Association, 2010; boundary of BMI based on 《Guidelines for prevention of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults》; status of exercise wasdefied as the ideal status: 〉80 mirdweek, general status: 〈 80 rain/week and bad status: no exercise. Results: Finally, 1812 participants were recruited for survey and they were divided into 3 groups according to improved CHS: G-roup①, CHS (0-4) points, n=56, Group②, CHS (5-9) points n=1600 and Group③, CHS (10-14) points, n=156. The 24-hour SBPV in Groups ①, ②and ③ were 16.02 mmHg, 14.91 mmHg and 13.18 mmHg; day-time SBPV were 15.42 mmHg, 14.50 mmHg and 13.22 mmHg; night-time SBPV were 12.68 mmHg, 11.44 mmHg and 10.16 mmHg, all P〈0.05. Multi- linear regression analysis indicated that with adjusted confounding factors, with 1 point of CHS elevation, the 24 hour-, day- time, night-time SBPV would reduce for 0.20 mmHg, 0.19 mmHg and 0.37 mmHg respectively, all P〈0.05. Conclusion: CHS was negatively related to short-time SBPV in elder population.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期976-980,共5页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 改良的心血管健康行为和因素评分 短时血压变异性 24小时收缩压变异性 日间收缩压变异性 夜间收缩压变异性 Improved cardiovascular health score Short-time blood pressure variability 24-hour systolic blood pressurevariability Day-time systolic blood pressure variability Night-time systolic blood pressure variability
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and health promotion and disease reduction: The American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation, 2010, 121: 586-613.
  • 2Huffman MD, Capewell S, Ning H, et al. Cardiovascular heahh behavior and health factor changes (1988-2008) and projections to 2020: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Circulation, 2012, 125: 2595-2602.
  • 3Parati G, Schumacher H. Blood pressure variability over 24 h: prognostic implications and treatment perspectives. An assessment using the smoothness index with telmisartan-amlodipine manotherapy and combination. Hypertens Res, 2014, 37: 187-193.
  • 4孙刚,闫旭龙,王峰,孙丽蓉,吕文丽,武灵英,王绍贞.老年原发性高血压患者心脑血管事件与动态血压的关系[J].中国循环杂志,2000,15(5):280-282. 被引量:25
  • 5Oikonen M, Laitinen TT, Magnussen CG, et al. Ideal cardiovascular health in young adult populations from the United States, Finland, and Australia and its association with clMT: the International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort Consortium. J Am Heart Assoc, 2013, 2: e000244.
  • 6Kulshreshtha A, Goyal A, Veledar E, et al. Association belween ideal cardiovascular health and carotid intima-media thickness: a twin tudy. J Am Heart Assoe, 2014, 3: e000282.
  • 7Folsom AR, Yatsuya H, Nettleton JA, et al. Community prevalence nf ideal cardiovascular health, by the American Heart Association definition, and relationship with cardiovascular disease incidence . J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011, 57: 1690-1696.
  • 8Giampaoli S, Palmieri L, Panico S, et al. Favorable cardiovascular risk profile (low risk) and 10-year stroke incidence in women and men: findings from 12 Italian population samples. Am J Epideminl, 2006, 163: 893-902.
  • 9Song YM, Sung J, Davey Smith G, et al. Body mass index and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a prospective study in Korean men . Stroke, 2004, 35: 831-836.
  • 10Zhang XF, Attia J, D'Este C, et al. Prevalence and magnitude of classical risk factors for stroke in a cohort of 5092 Chinese steelworkers over 13.5 years of follow-up. Stroke, 2004, 35: 1052- 1056.

二级参考文献38

  • 1吴锡桂,武阳丰,周北凡,陶寿淇,沈丽卿,王淑玉,朱树雄,徐祥林,杨瑞祥,杜福昌,王益琏,何厚琦,夏舜英,阮连生.我国十组人群高血压发病率及其影响因素[J].中华医学杂志,1996,76(1):24-29. 被引量:147
  • 2Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, et al. Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens, 1987,5:93-98.
  • 3Howard SC, Rothwell PM. Reproducibility of measures of visit-to- visit variability in blood pressure after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis ,2009,28:331-340.
  • 4Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet,2010,375:595-905.
  • 5Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, et al. The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES Ⅲ, 1985 to 1994. Hypertension, 2011,57 : 160-166.
  • 6Mancia G, Parati G. The role of blood pressure variability in end- organ damage. J Hypertens Suppl, 2003,21 :S17-23.
  • 7Rothwell PM. Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet, 2010,375:938-948.
  • 8Abramson JL, Lewis C, Murrah NV, et al. Relation of C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha to ambulatory blood pressure variability in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol, 2006,98: 649-652.
  • 9Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong YL, Labarthe D, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American heart association' s strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond [J]. Circulation, 2010, 121:586-613.
  • 10Shay CM, Ning H, Allen NB, et al. Status of cardiovascular health in US adults: prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2003-2008 [J]. Circulation, 2012,125: 45-56.

共引文献34

同被引文献26

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部