期刊文献+

基于群体药动学和药效学模型优化成年感染患者的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦给药方案 被引量:4

Optimizing dosage regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam in adult patients with sepsis based on population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过哌拉西林群体药动学和药效学特征进行最佳临床给药方案的筛选,确定符合临床疗效靶标的最佳给药方案。方法:应用NONMEM软件对所确定的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦群体药动学模型进行模型仿真,计算不同给药方案下的药动学和药效学数据结果,并根据结果确定最佳给药方案。结果:当MIC=8 mg/L时,只有4 g q8h持续输注可以达到药效100%,而输注3 h和4 h只能达到87.5%。当MIC<=32 mg/L时,4g q8h持续输注均可以达到药效100%,而输注时间3 h和4 h只能达到43.7%和50%。3 g q6h输注30 min与输注3 h疗效相当,持续输注的疗效仍然远远高于输注3 h的给药方式。 AIM: To identify the optimal dosage regimens of piperacillin / tazobactam according to population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics characteristics in order to attain target clinic effect.METHODS: To simulate the vivo data of piperacillin / tazobactam based on population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics model using NONMEM. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data were calculated for different dosage regimens and therefore the optimal dosage regimens were acknowledged.RESULTS: The PTA can attain 100% using 4g q8h infusion 8h when MIC equal to 8mg / L,but it was 87. 5% for 3h and 4h infusion. When MIC is greater to 32mg / L,the PTA can attain 100% using4 g q8 h infusion 8h,but it were only 43. 7% and50% for 3h and 4h infusion,respectively. The PTA is identical for 3g q6h infusion 30 min and 3h.CONCLUSION: When MIC〈 = 4 mg / L,the recommended optimal dosage regimen is 4g q8h infusion 3h. When MIC = 〉8mg / L,the recommended optimal dosage regimen is 4g q8h infusion 8h. This study provide a simple,directed and rapid way to check clinical effect of piperacillin / tazobactam and therefore can be used to optimize the dosage regimen.
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2015年第9期1037-1041,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 北京大学第三医院院内科研基金(77476-01)
关键词 哌拉西林/他唑巴坦 群体药动学 药效学 最佳给药方案 piperacillin/tazobactam popula-tion pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamics optimal dosage regimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1Langgartner J, Lehn N, Gltiek T, et al. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and sulbactam during intermittent and continuous intravenous infusion [J]. Chemotherapy, 2007, 53 (5) : 370-377.
  • 2Sakka SG, Glauner AK, Bulitta JB, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous versus short-term infusion of imipencm-cilastatin in critically ill patients in a randomized, controlled trial[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2007, 51 (9) : 3304-3310.
  • 3DeRyke CA, Kuti JL, Mansfield D, et al. Pharmacoeconomics of continuous versus intermittent infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infection [J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2006, 63 (8): 750-755.
  • 4Georges B, Conil JM, Cougot P, et al. Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion vs. an intermittent dosing regimen [J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2005, 43 (8): 360-369.
  • 5Buck C, Bertram N, Ackermann T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam: intermittent dosing versus continuous infusion[J]. IntJ Antimicrob Agents, 2005, 25 (1): 62-67.
  • 6Roberts JA, Boots R, Rickard CM, et al. Is continuous infusion ceftriaxone better than once-a-day dosing in intensive care? A randomized controlled pilot study [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2007, 59 (2): 285-291.
  • 7Lau WK, Mercer D, Itani KM, et al. Randomized, open-label, comparative study of piperacillin-tazobactam administered by continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion for treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2006, 50 (11) : 3556-3561.
  • 8Rafati MR, Rouini MR, Mojtahedzadeh M, et al. Clinical efficacy of continuous infusion of piperacillin compared with intermittent dosing in septic critically ill patients [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2006, 28 (2): 122-127.
  • 9Lorente L, Lorenzo L, Mastin MM, et al. Meropenem by continuous versus intermittent infusion in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to gram-negative bacilli [J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2006, 40 (2) : 219-223.
  • 10Georges B, Conil JM, Cougot P, et al. Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion vs. an intermittent dosing regimen [J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2005, 43 (8) : 360-369.

共引文献282

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部