期刊文献+

权力启动对权力刻板印象的影响 被引量:3

Effects of Power Priming on Power Stereotype
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨权力启动对权力刻板印象的影响。方法:通过情景启动程序操纵权力,考察被试在高权力启动、控制组和低权力启动条件下对高、低权力目标对象的刻板印象判断。结果:权力启动和权力特质对能力、才能判断的交互效应显著,低权力启动组低权力特质被试对低权力目标对象能力和才能的评分要显著高于高权力特质被试的评分;权力启动、权力特质和目标对象权力对热情判断的交互效应显著,低权力启动组低权力特质被试对高权力目标对象热情的评分要显著高于高权力特质被试的评分。结论:权力刻板印象在一定条件下会受知觉者权力感的影响,低权力特质的被试在降低权力时,对低权力目标对象"低能力"的刻板印象和对高权力目标对象"低热情"的刻板印象均随之减弱。 Objective: To explore the influence of power priming on power stereotype. Methods: It investigated the participants' judgments on the high-power objects and the low-power objects on high- or low-power position or control condition, which manipulate power by episodic priming procedure. Results: There was significant interactive effect between power trait and power priming, with the low-power trait participants' score of competence and talent of low-power objects were significantly higher than high-power trait participants' score under the low-power priming; and with the low-power trait participants' score of warmth of high-power objects were significantly higher than high-power trait participants' score at the same condition. Conclusion: Power stereotype is influenced by the perceivers' power changing under given conditions,the low-power trait participants' "low-competence"stereotype of low-power objects and"low-warmth"stereotype of highpower objects all weakened when reduce their level of power.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期848-852,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究优秀青年项目(15B262) 中南林业科技大学引进高层次人才科研启动基金项目
关键词 权力 启动 权力刻板印象 Power Prime Power stereotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Tiedens LZ, Ellsworth PC, Mesquita B. Stereotypes about sentiments and status: Emotional expectations for high-and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26: 560-574.
  • 2Fragale AR, Rosen B, Xu C, Merideth I. The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 108: 53-65.
  • 3Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick PS, Xu J. A model of(often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902.
  • 4Russell AMT, Fiske ST. It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 38: 1193-1201.
  • 5Fragale AR, Overbeck JR, Neale MA. Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets'power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011, 4: 767-775.
  • 6Nier JA, Bajaj P, McLean MC, Schwartz E. Group status, perceptions of agency, and the correspondence bias: Attributional processes in the formation of stereotypes about high and low status groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2013, 16(4): 476-487.
  • 7管健,程婕婷.刻板印象内容模型的确认、测量及卷入的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(2):184-188. 被引量:50
  • 8张珊明,罗伏生,钟毅平,陈芸.权力刻板印象及自我卷入的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(5):751-753. 被引量:4
  • 9Ambady N, Shih M, Kim A, Pittinsky TL. Stereotype suscep-tibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 2001, 12: 385-390.
  • 10McKown C, Weinstein RS. The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood. Child Development, 2003, 74: 498-515.

二级参考文献125

  • 1佐斌,张阳阳,赵菊,王娟.刻板印象内容模型:理论假设及研究[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(1):138-145. 被引量:88
  • 2张莹瑞,佐斌.社会认同理论及其发展[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):475-480. 被引量:648
  • 3Aquino, K., Stewart, M. M., & Reed, A. (2005). How social dominance orientation and job status influence perceptions of African-American affirmative action beneficiaries. Personnel Psychology, 58, 703-744.
  • 4Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 728-738.
  • 5Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 554-594). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • 6Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 7Henry, P. J. & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365-378.
  • 8Hornsey, M. J., Spears, R., Cremers, I., Hogg, M. A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216-227.
  • 9Huddy, L. (2004). Contrasting theoretical approaches to intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 25, 947-967.
  • 10Jonathan, F. (2010). The effects of mortality salience and social dominance orientation on attitudes toward illegal immigrants. Social Psychology, 41, 52-55.

共引文献99

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部