期刊文献+

4~6岁幼儿元记忆监测准确性与记忆成绩的相关

A Research on Correlation between Metamemory Monitoring Accuracy and Memory Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨4~6岁幼儿元记忆监测准确性(EOL,JOL,JOC))与记忆成绩的相关。方法:采用3年龄(4,5,6)×2性别(男,女)×2材料难度(难,易)的混合实验设计。结果:①EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间总体相关分别为-0.69、-0.65,-0.50,均达到0.01显著性水平。②年龄越小EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间的相关值越高。③EOL、JOL和JOC准确性与记忆成绩间的相关不存在显著性别差异。④高难度材料上EOL准确性与记忆成绩间相关值显著高于低难度材料上。结论:4~6岁幼儿EOL和JOL准确性均与记忆成绩有较高相关;JOC准确性与记忆成绩呈中等相关。年龄和性别不是影响元记忆监测准确性与记忆成绩相关的主要因素。材料难度影响EOL准确性与记忆成绩间相关程度。 Objective: The study aimed to investigate the relationship between accuracy of metamemory monitoring(EOL, JOL, JOC) and memory performance in 4-6 years old children. Methods: We adopted a 3×2×2(age, gende,rmaterial) mixed experimental design. Results: ①There was a significant correlation between memory monitoring(EOL, JOL, JOC)accuracy and memory performance. The values of correlation were:-0.69,-0.65,-0.50, respectively. ②The lower the age,the higher the value of correlation was observed, suggesting a developmental difference trend in the correlation of memory monitoring with memory performance. ③No significant gender difference was observed in the correlation between metamemory monitoring(EOL, JOL, JOC) accuracy and memory performance. ④The more difficult the memory material presented,the higher correlation was observed between EOL accuracy and memory performance. Conclusion: The accuracies of EOL and JOL both have high correlations with memory performance in 4 to 6 years old children. In this relationship, material difficulty may serve as a moderating role.
作者 严燕
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期867-869,877,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(15LZUJBWZY010) 奕阳教育研究院资助
关键词 元记忆 任务难度预见 学习判断 提取自信心判断 Metamemory Ease of learning Judgment of learning Judgment of confidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Howard CE, Andrés P, Broks P, Noad R, Sadler M, Coker D, et al. Memory, metamemory and their dissociation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48: 921-932.
  • 2Metcalfe J. Evolution of metacognition. In Dunlosky J, Bjork R. Handbook of Metacognitionand Learning: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008. 138-322.
  • 3黎坚,袁文东,骆方,杜卫.心理负荷对元记忆监测准确性及偏差的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2009,25(3):61-67. 被引量:8
  • 4de Carvalho Filho, MK, Yuzawa M. The effects of social influences and general metacognitive knowledge on metamemory judgments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2006, 26(4): 571-587.
  • 5Antshel KM, Nastasi R. Metamemory development in preschool children with ADHD. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008, 29: 403-411.
  • 6Thiede KW, Anderson MCM, Therriault D. Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003, 95(1): 66-73.
  • 7Hager W, Hasselhorn M. Memory monitoring and memory performance: Linked closely or loosely? . Psychological Research, 1992, 54(2): 110-113.
  • 8Sinkavich FJ. Performance and metamemory: Do students know what they don't know? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 1995, 22(1): 77-87.
  • 9唐卫海,刘希平,方格.回忆准备就绪程度的判断准确性与记忆成绩的相关[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):91-93. 被引量:4
  • 10刘希平,唐卫海,方格.任务难度预见的准确性与记忆成绩的相关[J].心理科学,2004,27(1):111-113. 被引量:8

二级参考文献40

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部