期刊文献+

中医药治疗肿瘤放疗、化疗后腹泻的疗效评价方法评述 被引量:7

Comment on Efficacy Evaluation Methods of Chinese Medicine in Treating Diarrhea of Tumor Patients after Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 对现有中医药治疗放疗、化疗后腹泻疗效评价方法进行汇总,认为目前最常用的疗效评价方法主要有治愈率、有效率等率的计算与比较,采用现代医学标准进行病情程度的评价,中医症状评分,根据现代医学症状、体征及相应实验室与影像学检查结果评价等方法。目前疗效评价方法存在的主要问题:以治愈率、有效率等率的结果代替原始数据,影响研究真实性与科学性;无法体现中医治疗特色与优势;存在片面性及缺乏针对性;忽视安全性的评价。通过分析认为,结合现代医学实验室检查及影像学分析、配合患者生存质量评价、重视安全性评价是中医药治疗肿瘤放疗及化疗后腹泻较为全面的评价方法。 The researchers summarized the existing evaluation methods of therapeutic efficiency about TCM treating diarrhea after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. They thought that the most frequently-used evaluation methods of therapeutic efficiency at present are mainly calculation and comparison about kinds of rates,such as cure rate,effective rate. Current practice uses the standard of western medicine to evaluate illness degree,symptom scores of TCM,evaluation according to the symptoms,signs and corresponding results from laboratory and imageological examination and so on. At present,evaluation methods of therapeutic efficiency have the following problems: using rates such as cure rate and effective rate instead of the original data influences authenticity and scientificity of research;unable to reflect features and advantages of TCM treatment; existing one-sidedness and lacking of pertinence; as well as ignoring the evaluation of security. The researchers thought that combining with modern medical laboratory tests and imaging analysis,cooperating with evaluation of patients' survival quality and attaching great importance to the evaluation of security are more comprehensive evaluation method of Chinese medicine in treating diarrhea after radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
出处 《中医杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第21期1831-1835,共5页 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 肿瘤 腹泻 放疗 化疗 疗效评价 tumor diarrhea radiotherapy chemotherapy evaluation of therapeutic efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1张圣林,孙方利,高伟,潘延涌,常方芝.化疗相关性腹泻的治疗体会[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2008,28(10):945-946. 被引量:6
  • 2U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 [EB/OL]. (2006-08-09) [2015-08-30]. http:// ctep. cancer, gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_ applica- tions/docs/ctcaev3, pdf.
  • 3U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. 0 [EB/OL]. (2010 -06- 14) [2015 -06 -07]. http:// ctep. cancer, gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_ applica- tions/ctc, htm#ctc_40.
  • 4皋文君,刘砚燕,袁长蓉.国际肿瘤化疗药物不良反应评价系统——通用不良反应术语标准4.0版[J].肿瘤,2012,32(2):142-144. 被引量:503
  • 5Tobinai K, Kohno A, Shimada Y, et al. Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group [J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 1993, 23(4) : 250-257.
  • 6Radiation therapy oncology group acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria[EB/OL]. [2015 - 08 - 30]. http ://www. rtog. org. researchassociates/adverseeventreporting/acutera- diationmorbidityscoringcriteria, aspx.
  • 7Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radia- tion Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995, 31 (5): 1341 -1346.
  • 8Pavy JJ, Denekamp J, Letschert J, et al. Late effects tox- icity scoring: the SOMA scale [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995, 31(5): 1043-1047.
  • 9LENT SOMA Scales for all anatomic sites [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995, 31 (5) : 1049 - 1091.
  • 10孙传兴.临床疾病诊断依据治愈好转标准[M]2版[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1998.360.

二级参考文献42

共引文献1309

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部