期刊文献+

胰十二指肠切除术后患者早期肠内营养与肠外营养的比较 被引量:7

Early postoperative enteral nutrition vs parenteral nutrition in patients after pancreaticoduodenecto-my: a comparative study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨标准胰十二指肠切除术后不同的营养方式对于患者术后并发症的影响。方法对西安交通大学第一附属医院2009年1月至2013年1月接受标准胰十二指肠切除术的340例患者进行了回顾性对照研究。按照术后营养方式的不同分为术后早期肠内营养联合肠外营养组和单纯肠外营养组,对两组患者术前一般特征、病理结果、手术情况以及术后并发症等进行统计学分析。结果两组患者的术前基础状态、切除组织病理类型以及术中相关参数差异均无统计学意义。与全肠道外营养组相比,联合营养组胃排空延迟(DGE)发生率增加(15.9%比6.7%,P〈0.05),肺炎发生率增加(10.3%比3.6%,P〈0.05),鼻胃管放置时间[(5.6±0.2)d比(3.9±0.1)d,P〈0.05)]延长,住院费用亦增加[(65 397.0±861.2)元比(50 663.9±239.2)元,P〈0.05]。结论标准胰十二指肠切除术后早期肠内营养联合肠外营养可能导致DGE、肺炎的发生率及住院费用增加,并延长鼻胃管放置时间。因此,早期肠内营养的应用需严格谨慎。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of early enteral nutrition combined with additional parenteral nutrition (EEN + PN) versus TPN (total parenteral nutrition) in patients after conven- tional pancreatieoduodenectomy (PD). Methods From January 2009 to January 2013, 340 consecutive patients who underwent conventional PD with Child's reconstruction at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were enrolled into this single-center retrospective comparative study. There were 87 pa- tients in the EEN + PN group and 253 patients in the TPN group. The preoperative baseline characteristics, histopathologieal types, intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative general charac- teristics data, pathological patterns, and intraoperative details. There were significantly higher rates in de- layed gastric emptying ( DGE ), morbidity ( 15.9% vs 6. 7%, P 〈 0.05 ), and pneumonia ( 10. 3% vs 3.6%, P 〈0. 05) ; significantly prolonged nasogastric tube removal time (5.6 ± 0. 2 days vs 3.9 ± 0. 1 days, P 〈 0. 05 ), and increase in hospitalization expenses (65 397.0 ± 861.2 ) Yuan vs (50 663.9 ± 239. 2) Yuan, P 〈 0.05 ) in the EEN + PN group when compared with the TPN group. Conclusions EEN + PN after conventional PD was associated with increased rates of DGE and pneumonia, prolonged nasogas- tric tube removal time, longer EN duration and increase in hospitalization expenses. Hence, EEN should on- ly be performed prudently and selectively.
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期686-690,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81470896,81372582,81101873) 西安交通大学第一附属医院长学制医学生临床创新科研基金(14ZD02)
关键词 胰十二指肠切除术 早期肠内营养 肠外营养 Pancreaticoduodenectomy Postoperative early enteral nutrition Parenteral nutrition
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Wente MN,Shrikhande SV,Muller MW,et al.Pancreaticojeju- nostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy:systematic review and me- ta-analysis[J].Am J Surg,2007,193(2):171-183.
  • 2蒙广星,邢谦哲,袁强,王毅军,杜智.胰十二指肠切除术胰管内外引流预防胰瘘作用的比较[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2014,20(6):473-475. 被引量:10
  • 3Torosian MH.Perioperative nutrition support for patients undergo- ing gastrointestinal surgery:critical analysis and recommendations[J].World J Surg,1999,23(6):565-569.
  • 4Rayar M,SuIpice L,Meunier B,et al.Enteral nutrition reduces delayed gastric emptying after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy with child reconstruction[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(5):1004-1011.
  • 5Feng Y,Ralls MW,Xiao W,et al.Loss of enteral nutrition in a mouse model results in intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2012,1258(12):71-77.
  • 6Yang H,Feng Y,Sun X,et al.Enteral versus parenteral nutri- tion:effect on intestinal barrier function[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2009,1165(1):338-346.
  • 7Padussis JC,Zani S,Blazer DG,et al.Feeding jejunostomy du- ring Whipple is associated with increased morbidity[J].J Surg Res,2014,187(2):361-366.
  • 8Gerritsen A,Besselink MG,Gouma DJ,et al.Systematic review of five feeding routes after pancreatoduodenectomy[J].Br J Surg,2013,100(5):589-598.
  • 9Gerritsen A,Besselink MG,Cieslak KP,et al.Efficacy and com- plications of nasojejunal,jejunostomy and parenteral feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2012,16(6):1144-1151.
  • 10Martignoni ME,Friess H,Sell F,et al.Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after Whipple resection[J].Am J Surg,2000,180(1):18-23.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Yasuji Seyama,Masatoshi Makuuchi.Current surgical treatment for bile duct cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(10):1505-1515. 被引量:74
  • 2Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a collective re- view[J]. Am Surg, 2011,77(3) : 257-269.
  • 3Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, et al. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stentplacement duringpancreaticoduodenectomy[ J ]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(8) :1050-1061.
  • 4Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group(ISGPF) definition[J]. Surg, 2005,138(1) : 8-13.
  • 5Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after a prospective randomized trial [J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246(3) :425-433.
  • 6Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, Mariette C, et al. External pancreatic duct stent decreases pancreatic fistula rate after panereaticoduode- nectomy: prospective multicenter randomized trial[ J ]. Ann Surg, 2011,253 (5) :879-885.
  • 7Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pan- creaticoduodenectomy? results of a prospective randomized trim [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006,10 (9) : 1280-1290.
  • 8Smymiotis V, Arkadopoulos N, Kyriazi MA, et al. Does internal stenting of the panereaticojejunostomy improve outcomes after pan- creatoduodenectomy? a prospective study [ J ]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2010,395(3) :195-200.
  • 9Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, et 8-1. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duet to reduce postopera- tive pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy[ J]. Br J Surg, 2012,99(4) :524-531.
  • 10Kaman L, Nusrath S, Dahiya D, et al. External stenting of pan- creaticojejunostomy anastomosis and pancreatic duct after pancreat- icoduodenectomy[ J]. Updates Surg, 2012, 64(4):257-264.

共引文献29

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部