期刊文献+

定价核之谜与概率权重函数 被引量:5

Pricing Kernel Puzzle and Probability Weighting Functions
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用期权及标的资产价格数据,基于离散时间EGARCH模型和连续时间GARCH扩散模型分别估计了客观与风险中性密度,进而推导了经验定价核.在此基础上,基于等级依赖期望效用模型,在标准的效应函数形式下构建了相应的概率权重函数.采用香港恒生指数及其指数权证价格数据进行实证研究,结果表明:(1)经验定价核不是单调递减的,而是展现出驼峰(非单调性),即"定价核之谜";(2)经验概率权重函数展现S型,表明市场投资者低估尾部概率事件,高估中、高概率事件;(3)"定价核之谜"可以由具有标准效用函数与S型概率权重函数的等级依赖期望效用模型解释。 The investor behavior has always been in focus in the literature on financial economics.Naturally,it involves the pricing kernel,which also known as the stochastic discount factor.In standard economic theory,the pricing kernel is a monotonically decreasing function of the market return,corresponds to a concave utility function and investor risk aversion.However,there has been a lot of discussion about the reliability of this theory.Many recent empirical studies based on index option data have provide evidence of non-monotonically decreasing pricing kernel.The non-monotonicity of empirical pricing kernel estimates has become known as the"pricing kernel puzzle"or"risk aversion puzzle".Numerous attempts have been undertaken to explain the reason for the"pricing kernel puzzle"from different perspectives,including investor’s heterogeneous beliefs,misspecification of the underlying state space,ambiguity aversion,rankdependent expected utility,incomplete market,statistical artifact,investor’s sentiment,etc.In this paper we consider a pricing kernel based on the rank-dependent expected utility model with a probability weighting function.The rank-dependent expected utility model was first introduced by Quiggin(1982),and further developed by Yaari(1987)and Allais(1988).We show that this model is consistent with several features of the empirical pricing kernel estimated from index options and that the data imply the shape of probability weights with the emphasis on tail events.Methods:In the last decades,there is a large literature on the estimation of the pricing kernel.A number of earlier papers estimate the pricing kernel using aggregate consumption data,problems with imprecise measurement of aggregate consumption can weaken the empirical results of these papers.Recently,many authors have used the historical underlying asset and option prices data to estimate the pricing kernel.This approach avoids the use of aggregate consumption data and can obtain more reliable results.Based on the option and underlying asset prices data,this paper derives the empirical pricing kernel by estimating the objective and risk-neutral densities based on the discrete-time EGARCH model and continuoustime GARCH diffusion model,respectively.Furthermore,the probability weighting functions are constructed based on the rank-dependent expected utility model and provides an explanation for the"pricing kernel puzzle".Results:The empirical results based on the Hong Kong Hang Seng index(HSI)and index warrant prices data show that:(1)The estimated empirical pricing kernel is non-monotone and exhibits a hump,which known as the "pricing kernel puzzle";(2)The estimated probability weights have the S shape,which overweights the probabilities in the middle and high of the distribution and underweights the tail events;(3)The"pricing kernel puzzle"can be explained by the rank-dependent expected utility model with standard utility and the S-shaped probability weighting function.Conclusions:The empirical pricing kernel from option and underlying asset prices are estimated and probability weighting functions are constructed based on the rank-dependent expected utility model,and provides an explanation for the"pricing kernel puzzle".The results show that the estimated empirical pricing kernel is non-monotonic,i.e."pricing kernel puzzle".Under the standard CRRA utility function,the constructed probability weighting functions have S shape,indicating that investor underweights the tail events(the probabilities in the tails)and overweights the probabilities in the middle and high of the distribution.Thus,the nonmonotonic pricing kernel("pricing kernel puzzle")is explained by the rank-dependent expected utility with concave utility and the S-shaped probability weighting function.This type of weighting function represents investor’s excessive optimism and overconfidence,which is also consistent with the findings of Barone-Adesi(2014)in the sense of sentiment theory.The probability weighting is an important and empirically relevant element for understanding asset prices,which can be applied to a wide range of problems in finance related to investment decision-making,option pricing,risk management and fund rating.Some evidences for the assumptions of investor behavior are provided in our findings.
作者 吴鑫育
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期26-36,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71501001) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(14YJC790133) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1408085QG139) 安徽省高等学校省级优秀青年人才基金重点项目(2013SQRW025ZD)
关键词 定价核 概率权重函数 等级依赖期望效用 极大似然 pricing kernel probability weight function rank-dependent expected utility maximum likelihood
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Brown D P,Jackwerth J C. The pricing kernel puzzle: Reconciling index option data and economic theory//Batten J, Wagner N,Thornton R,et al. Derivatives securities pricing and modelling, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012, 155-183.
  • 2At-Sahalia Y, Lo A W. Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2000, 94(1): 9-51.
  • 3Jackwerth J C. Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realized returns[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2000, 13(2): 433-451.
  • 4Rosenberg J, Engle R F. Empirical pricing kernels[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2002, 64(3): 341-372.
  • 5Golubev Y, H?rdle W, Timofeev R. Testing monotonicity of pricing kernels. Working paper, Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, 2009.
  • 6Beare B K, Schmidt L D. An empirical test of pricing kernel monotonicity. Working paper, University of California, 2013.
  • 7Ziegler A. Why does implied risk aversion smile?[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(3): 859-904.
  • 8Bakshi G, Madan D. Investor heterogeneity and the non-monotonicity of the aggregate marginal rate of substitution in the market index. Working paper, University of Maryland, 2008.
  • 9Detlefsen K, H?rdle W, Moro R. Empirical pricing kernels and investor preferences. Working paper, Universite de Provence, 2007.
  • 10H?rdle W, Kr?tschmer V, Moro R. A microeconomic explanation of the EPK paradox. Working paper, Humboldt-Universit?t zu Berlin, 2009.

二级参考文献92

共引文献34

同被引文献24

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部