期刊文献+

信息披露最优化与交易效率——一个弱势个体与强势个体交换的例证 被引量:1

Information Disclosure Optimization and Transaction Efficiency:A Case on Exchange Between Weak Individuals and Strong Individuals
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以中小企业融资市场为例,应用数理模型揭示了弱势个体通过集体形式披露信息从而提高交易效率的微观机理。研究发现,弱势个体在同强势个体进行交易时,不仅存在信息披露最优化问题,还存在着规模效应不足的问题,这致使两者在现实中难以实现交易。研究表明:1.一定程度上信息不对称能使弱势个体与强势个体在交易中实现双赢;2.弱势个体在无法正常披露信息时,通过捆绑以强势集体形式披露信息,不仅可以改善强弱双方的信息不对称状况,而且可以把弱势个体隐匿型信息内部化,以利于同强势个体交易,从而提高交易效率;3.集体披露信息机制还能够创造规模效应。 Based on SMEs financing market in China,a mathematical model is constructed to reveal the disadvantaged individual disclosure information mechanism in the collective form under the condition of information asymmetry.It is found that not only there is information disclosure optimization,but also there exists the problem of insufficient scale effect when exchanging between strong individuals and weak individuals,therefore,in real life,they exchange difficultly.The research shows that,to certain extent,information asymmetry can make vulnerable individuals with a strong individual achieve win-win situation in the course of exchange.When disadvantaged individuals could not normally disclosure information,they can bind together and disclosure information in strong collective form.Thus it improves the condition of the information asymmetry in both sides,the collective disclosure of information also can make the disadvantaged individuals information internal in order to exchange easily with strong ones.Furthermore,it can create scale effect.
作者 孙林
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期71-79,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
关键词 信息披露 最优化 交易 information disclosure optimization exchange
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Stiglitz J E, Weiss A.Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. American Economic Review,1981,71(3):393—410.
  • 2王宣喻,储小平.信息披露机制对私营企业融资决策的影响[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):31-39. 被引量:113
  • 3Berger A N, The profit-structure relationship in banking-tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1995,27 (2): 404—445.
  • 4林毅夫,李永军.中小金融机构发展与中小企业融资[J].经济研究,2001,36(1):10-18. 被引量:3041
  • 5Akerlof G A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, 84(3):488—500.
  • 6Spence M. Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets[J]. The American Economic Review,2002, 92(3):434-459.
  • 7Tirole J. A Theory of collective reputations (with application to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality) [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1996, 63(1):1-22.
  • 8Levine J. Career concern and collective reputation. Working Paper. Stanford University, 2001.
  • 9张琥.集体信誉的理论分析——组织内部逆向选择问题[J].经济研究,2008,43(12):124-133. 被引量:29
  • 10Levine J. The dynamics of collective reputation[J]. The B. E.Journal of Theoretical Economics, 2009, 9(1):1-23.

二级参考文献32

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:977
  • 2刘少波.我国目前的民间信用研究[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),1999,21(1):8-19. 被引量:16
  • 3蔡洪滨,张琥,严旭阳.中国企业信誉缺失的理论分析[J].经济研究,2006,41(9):85-93. 被引量:32
  • 4Cripps W, Mailath, G. and L. Samuelson,2004b, "Disappearing Private Reputations in Long-Run Relationships", Working Paper.
  • 5Ely, J.C., and J. Valimaki, 2002, "Bad Reputation", Quarterly Journal ofEconomlcs, 118, 785-814.
  • 6Evans, Robert and Timothy Guinnane, 2007, "Collective Reputation, Professional Regulation and Franchising", Working Paper.
  • 7Fudenberg, Drew, 1992, "Explaining Cooperation and Commitment in Repeated Games", in J, Laffont,Advances in Economic Theory, Sixth World Congress, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Holmstrom, Bengt, 1999, Managerial Incentive Problem : A Dynamic Perspective, Review of Economic Studies, 169-182.
  • 9Horner, J, 2001, "Reputation and Competition", American Economic Review, 92, 644-663.
  • 10Klein, B and L Saft, 1985, "The Law and Economics of Franchise Tying Contracts", Journal of Law and Economics, 28(2), 345-361.

共引文献3145

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部