期刊文献+

三甲医院医务人员职业应激与隐性缺勤的关联研究 被引量:31

Association between occupational stress and presenteeism among medical staff at grade A tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解三甲医院医务人员职业应激和隐性缺勤现况,分析职业应激与隐性缺勤之间的关联。方法2012年5至6月,采用分层随机抽样的方法对上海8家三甲医院的2356名医务人员进行调查,所有调查对象知情同意并自主完成问卷填写。职业应激由职业应激核心问卷进行评估,隐性缺勤采用斯坦福隐性缺勤问卷评定。结果调查对象中隐性缺勤得分均分为15.23±3.89,72.5%的调查对象自评为职业应激。不同年龄组、学历、岗位、工龄、职称、倒班组间隐性缺勤差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。不同职业应激指标中工作要求、自主性、社会支持及工作要求与自主比值组间隐性缺勤得分和高隐性缺勤率间差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。高工作要求、高工作要求与自主比值是高隐性缺勤的危险因素,OR值分别为2.56(95%CI=2.01—3.27)、1.53(95%CI=1.23~1.90);而高社会支持是高隐性缺勤的保护因素,OR值为0.23(95%CI=0.18~0.29)。结论上海三甲医院医务人员职业应激程度越高,隐性缺勤程度越高,呈正相关。需要加大社会支持,以减少隐性缺勤所致工作效率损失。 Objective To investigate the current status of occupational stress and presenteeism among medical staff at grade A tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China, and to analyze the association between occupational stress and presenteeism. Methods A total of 2356 healthcare workers from eight grade A tertiary hospitals in Shanghai were investigated by stratified random sampling. All the subjects were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires with informed consent. The occupational stress was assessed by the occupational stress core questionnaire. The presenteeism was evaluated by the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Results In all subjects, the average score of presenteeism was 15.23±3.89, and 72.5% felt occupational stress in self-evaluation. There were significant differences in the score of presenteeism between subjects with different ages, education levels, occupations, lengths of service, job titles, and shifts (all P〈0.05). There were significant differences in the score of presenteeism and the rate of high presenteeism between subjects with different indices of occupational stress, including job demand, control, social support, and demand-control ratio (P〈0.01). High job demand and high demand-control ratio were risk factors for high presenteeism (OR =2.56, 95% CI=2.01-3.27; OR=1.53, 95% CI =1.23-1.90). High social support was a protective factor for high presenteeism (OR=0.23, 95% CI=0. 18-0.29). Conclusion The intensity of occupational stress in medical staff from grade A tertiary hospitals is positively correlated with the level of presenteeism. It is important to promote social support to reduce the loss of work efficiency due to presenteeism.
出处 《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第10期723-726,共4页 Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
基金 WHO合作中心双年资助项目(S03-68)
关键词 医务人员 隐性缺勤 职业应激 工作要求 社会支持 Medical staff Presenteeism Occupational stress Job demand Social support
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1谢震宇,戴俊明,黄云彪,王宇,辛辛,陈波.某区医务人员职业紧张及其影响因素调查[J].环境与职业医学,2012,29(3):144-147. 被引量:27
  • 2Goetzel RZ,Long SR,Ozminkowski RJ,et al,Health,absence,disability,and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting U.S.employers[J].J Oecup Environ Med,2004,46(4):398-412.
  • 3Schultz AB,Chen CY,Edington DW.The cost and impact of health conditions on presenteeism to employers:a review of the literature[J].Pharmacoeconomics,2009,27(5):365-378.
  • 4LetvakSA,Ruhm CJ,Gupa SN.Nurses' presenteeism and its effects on self-reported quality of care and costs[J].Am J Nurs,2012,112(2):30-38,48.
  • 5Turpin R,Ozminkowski RJ,Sharda CE,et al.Reliability and validity of the Stanford presenteeism scale[J].J Occup Environ Med,2004,46(11):1123-1133.
  • 6Koopman C,Pelletier KR,Murray JF,et al.Stanford presenteeism scale:health status and employee productivity[J].J Occup Environ Med,2002,44(1):14-20.
  • 7赵芳,戴俊明,颜士勇,杨佩娣,傅华.健康生产力受损量表(SPS-6)中文版的信度和效度研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2010,28(9):679-682. 被引量:83
  • 8Uegaki K,Bruijne MC,Beek AJ,et al.Economic evaluations of occupational health interventions from a company's perspective:a systematic review of methods to estimate the cost of health-related productivity loss[J].J Occup Hehabil,2011,21(1):90-99.
  • 9Lemer D,Amick BC,Rogers WH,et al.The work limitations questionnaire[J].Med Care 2001,39(1):72-85.
  • 10Heuvel SG,Geuskens GA,HooftmanWE,et al.Productivity loss at work,health-related and work-related factors[J].J Occup Rehabil,2010,20(3):331-339.

二级参考文献35

  • 1杨文杰,李健.工作场所中社会心理因素的测量——两种职业紧张检测模式的应用[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2004,22(6):422-426. 被引量:150
  • 2林嗣豪,王治明,王绵珍,兰亚佳.医务人员工作能力及影响因素的研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2005,23(6):445-447. 被引量:20
  • 3Turpin RS,Ozminkowski RJ,Sharda CE,et al.Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale.J Occup Environ Med,2004,46:1123-1133.
  • 4惠正一.员工健康管理提升公司生产力.第一财经日报,2007,12,17.http://financel.jrj.com.cn/news/2007-12-17/000003062740.html.
  • 5Musich S,Hook D,Baaner S,et al.The association of two productivity measures with health risks and medical conditions in an Australian employee population.Am J Health Promot,2006,20:353-363.
  • 6Burton WN,Chen CY,Conti DJ,et al.The association of health risks with on-the-job productivity.J Occup Environ Med,2005,47:769-777.
  • 7Lerner D,Amick BC 3rd,Rogers WH,et al.The work limitations questionnaire.Med Care,2001,39:72-85.
  • 8Mills PR,Kessler RC,Cooper J,et al.Impact of a health promotion program on employee health risks and work productivity.Am J Health Promot,2007,22:45-53.
  • 9Lerner D,Amick BC 3rd,Lee JC,et al.Relationship of employeereported work limitations to work productivity.Med Care,2003,41:649-659.
  • 10Meerding WJ,IJzelenberg W,Koopmanschap MA,et al.Health problems lead to considerable productivity loss at work among workers with high physical load jobs.J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58:517 -523.

共引文献107

同被引文献315

引证文献31

二级引证文献198

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部