3Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, et al. Comparison of virtual histology to intravascular ultrasound of culprit coronarylesions in acute coronary syndrome and target coronary lesions in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol, 2007, 100(6): 953-959.
5Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2001, 37(5): 1478-1492.
6Stamper D, Weissman NJ, Brezinski M. Plaque characterization with optical coherence tomography. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006, 47 (8 Suppl): C69-79.
7Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial thrombus by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 97(12): 1713-1717.
8Low AF, Kawase Y, Chart YH, et al. In vivo characterisation of coronary plaques with conventional grey-scale intravascular ultrasound: correlation with optical coherence tomography. Euro Intervention, 2009, 4(5): 626-632.
9Manfrini O, Mont E, Leone O, et al. Sources of error and interpretation of plaque morphology by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 98(2): 156-159.
10Kubo T, Imanishi T, Takarada S, et al. Assessment of culprit lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: ability of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and coronary angioscopy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 50(10): 933-939.
