期刊文献+

捕后羁押必要性审查机制的构建及程序衔接

Construction and Program Cohesion of Review Mechanism of the Necessity of Custody after Being Arrested
下载PDF
导出
摘要 逮捕及随之而来的羁押是对公民基本权利的剥夺,适用逮捕措施必须遵循必要性原则、比例原则的要求。我国审前羁押率过高的现状,背离了人权保障的价值理念,成为刑事诉讼进一步发展的一大障碍。修订后的《刑事诉讼法》赋予了检察机关捕后羁押必要性审查权,对于解决审前羁押率过高的问题大有裨益。行使捕后羁押必要性审查权力的应当是侦监部门、公诉部门及监所检察部门,三个部门应当建立协调配合机制以实现检察业务资源的优化整合。 Being arrested and the following custody is the deprivation of the fundamental rights of citizens and the application of arrest measures must meet the requirements of necessity principle and proportion principle. The present situation of high pre- trial custody rate in China departs from the value idea of human rights protection and becomes a major obstacle for the further development of criminal procedure. The revised "Criminal Procedure Law"gives procuratorial organs the review right of the necessity of custody after being arrested,which is beneficial to solve the problem of high pre- trial custody rate. It is the investigation and supervision department,public prosecution department,and procuratorial supervision department that can exercise the review right of the necessity of custody after being arrested and they should establish coordination mechanisms so as to optimize the integration of procuratorial business resources.
作者 王昕 林强
出处 《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》 2015年第3期96-99,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词 逮捕 羁押 审查机制 arrest custody review mechahism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献5

  • 1蒋安杰、胡新桥:《“两个适当分离”机制备受关注》[N].《法制日报》,2012-04-25.
  • 2王国枢:《刑事诉讼法概沦》[M].北京大学出版社1981年版,第80页.
  • 3中国法学会诉讼法研究会:《刑事诉讼法的修改与完善》[M].中国政法大学出版社1992年版,第220页.
  • 4顾昂然:《关于<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)>的说明》[C].载胡康生、李福成:《<中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法>释义》,法律出版社1996年版,第350页.
  • 5吕伟、王沿琰:《简易审公诉人出庭成都早是“死命令”》[N].《检察日报》,2012-04-18.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部