期刊文献+

顶板穿层钻孔水力压裂现场数值模拟研究 被引量:4

Roof Layer Drilling Hydraulic Fracturing Field Numerical Simulation Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以水力压裂增透机理为理论基础,以河南能源化工集团焦作煤业集团二1煤层的现场实测数据为参数,对演马庄矿22111运输巷顶板抽采巷打顶板穿层钻孔对煤体进行水力压裂,并运用RFPA2D-Flow软件进行水力压裂现场模拟。通过分析水力压裂过程中煤层裂隙的产生和贯通,以及压裂后钻孔周围主应力和渗透系数的变化,可知压裂后钻孔周围煤层主应力得到明显降低和渗透系数得到显著增加。并通过现场水力压裂抽采数据分析得出:压裂孔影响区域单孔日均抽放纯瓦斯流量是压裂孔未影响区域组抽采孔日均瓦斯抽采纯流量的35.35倍,抽采孔瓦斯浓度平均要提高1.34倍。水力压裂能显著增加抽采效果。 Based on the theory of hydraulic fracturing antireflection mechanism,take Henan Energy Chemical Group of Jiaozuo Mining Group 21 Coal Seam as a parameter to the actual measured data,to play 22111 transportation lane roof extraction layer drilling to hydraulic fracturing of coal body,and using RFPA2D- Flow hydraulic fracturing field simulation software in Mazhuang Coal Mine. Analyzed the produce of the coal seam in the process of hydraulic fracturing fracture and well versed in,and around the borehole after fracturing principal stress and the change of permeability coefficient,known around the borehole after fracturing coal principal stress is significantly reduced and the permeability coefficient increased significantly. And through the on- site hydraulic fracturing extraction data analysis: the hiatal area of influence puckering average daily drainage is pure gas flow pressure in no impact on regional group extraction holes per 35. 35 times that of the gas extraction from pure flow extraction pore gas concentration to increase 1. 34 times on average. Hydraulic fracturing can significantly increase the extraction effect.
作者 王林征
出处 《煤》 2015年第10期22-25,共4页 Coal
关键词 水力压裂 数值模拟 渗透系数 抽采 hydraulic fracturing numerical simulation the permeability coefficient extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1姜瑞忠,蒋廷学,汪永利.水力压裂技术的近期发展及展望[J].石油钻采工艺,2004,26(4):52-57. 被引量:143
  • 2钱鸣高,缪协兴,许家林.岩层控制中的关键层理论研究[J].煤炭学报,1996,21(3):225-230. 被引量:736
  • 3王振铎,代自勇,崔明月.超深井压裂工艺技术研究[J].石油钻采工艺,1996,18(6):54-59. 被引量:12
  • 4钱鸣高 缪协兴 许家林 等.岩层控制的关健层理论[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000..
  • 5[2]Rick Stanley. Fracturing for Water Control Utilizing Relative Perm Modifiers in Frac Fluids to Delay or Reduce Future Water Production Issues. presented at SPE ATW"Advancing the Application of Hydraulic Fracturing",March 9 - 14, 2003, Guilin, Guangxi, China
  • 6[4]Mayerhofer M J, Ehlig - Economides C A, Economides M J. Pressure Transient Analysis of Fracture Calibration Tests. SPE 26 527, presented at the 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers held in Houston,Texas, Oct. 3 -6,1993:217~230
  • 7[5]Jiang Tingxue, Wu Qi, Wang Xugang, et al. The Study of Performance Prediction of Treatment Wells in Low Permeability and Abnormal High Pressure Gas Reservoirs.SPE 77 463, prepared for presentation at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, September 29 - October 2, 2002
  • 8[9]Ding Yunhong,Jiang Tingxue, Wang Yongli , Sun Ping,Xu Zejun, Wang Xin, Zeng Bin. A Case Study of Massive Hydraulic fracturing in An Ultra - deep Gas Well. SPE 88 613, prepared for presentation at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition held in Perth, Australia, October 18 -20
  • 9王培义 李宗田 季龙华.水平井压裂裂缝形成机理初探与应用.石油天然气学报,2008,30(1):148-150.
  • 10湖南省红卫煤矿 辽宁省煤炭研究所.水力压裂排放瓦斯防止突出初步试验.煤矿安全,1973,(01):1-10.

共引文献452

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部