摘要
目的通过无保护分娩法及传统侧切法两种方法的对比来探讨无保护分娩应用于临床的效果。方法选取于我院2013年3月~2015年3月期间选择顺产的产妇共240名作为回顾性分析研究对象,将选择无保护分娩法的120例产妇为观察组,选取同期分娩的采用传统接生会阴侧切法产妇120例作为对照组。通过软产道裂伤程度、新生儿窒息、产后出血、产后伤口疼痛四个方面进行比较。结果观察组与对照组在软产道裂伤程度、新生儿窒息比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。而两组在产后出血量、产后伤口疼痛两组比较有明显差异(P〈0.05)。结论无保护分娩法是一种安全可行的分娩方式,该技术可以很大程度降低会阴侧切率,有效减少会阴损伤出血、减轻产妇伤口疼痛及会阴侧切术对生活的影响,从而提高产妇的生活质量。
Objective Comparison of two methods of non protection delivery method and traditional side cut method to explore the clinical effect of unprotected delivery.Methods Selection on maternal our hospital in March 2013 to March 2015 during vaginal delivery women choose to 240 as a retrospective analysis of the study,will unprotected delivery of 120 cases of do as the observation group.At the same time were selected by traditional method in 120 cases as control group.The degree of soft birth canal laceration,neonatal asphyxia,postpartum hemorrhage,postpartum pain four aspects compared.Results The observation group and the control group in the degree of soft birth canal laceration,neonatal asphyxia,the difference had no statistical significance(P〉0.05).While the two groups in the postpartum hemorrhage volume,postpartum wound pain,the two groups were significantly different(P〈0.05).Conclusion Unprotecteddelivery method is a feasible and safe delivery,the technology can greatly reduce perineal resection rate,reduce the injury of perineum,reduce maternal wound pain and perineal side to cut operation effect of life,so as to improve the quality of life of women.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2015年第28期107-108,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
无保护分娩法
传统侧切法
分娩方式
Non protected delivery method
Traditional side cut method
Delivery mode