期刊文献+

反流性食管炎应用奥美拉唑和法莫替丁治疗的效果对比评估及研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Assessment of the Effect of Omeprazole and Famotidine in Treatment With Reflux Oesophagitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估和对比反流性食管炎应用奥美拉唑和法莫替西治疗的临床治疗效果。方法选择2013年1月~2014年12月我院收治的80例反流性食管炎患者作为研究对象,随机把80例患者分成对照组与观察组,对照组给予法莫替西治疗,观察组给予奥美拉唑治疗,比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组治疗总有效率92.5%,对照组治疗总有效率72.5%,观察组总有效率高于对照(P〈0.05)。结论反流性食管炎患者应用奥美拉唑临床治疗效果更为理想。 Objective To evaluate and compare the reflux esophagitis,application of omeprazole and farmer for west clinical curative effect of treatment.Methods From January 2013 to December 2014,our hospital 80 cases of reflux esophagitis patients as the research object,randomly divided 80 patients into control group and observation group,control group given farmer for west treatment,observation group was given omeprazole treatment,compared two groups of patients with the clinical therapeutic effect.Results To observe the treatment group total effectiveness 92.5%,control group total effectiveness 72.5%,treatment group total effective rate is significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion Reflux esophagitis patients with omeprazole clinical treatment effect more ideal.
作者 谢兰
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第28期160-161,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 反流性食管炎 奥美拉唑 法莫替丁 Reflux esophagitis Omeprazole Famotidine
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献35

  • 1陆星华,张泰昌.反流性食管炎诊断及治疗指南(2003年)[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(4):221-222. 被引量:843
  • 2李兆申,徐晓蓉,许国铭,邹多武,孙振兴,王雯,叶萍,陆建萍.反流性食管炎的临床特征分析[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2005,22(5):315-318. 被引量:95
  • 3刘德远,徐桂芳.反流性食管炎的治疗进展[J].西藏科技,2005(12):35-36. 被引量:8
  • 4张晶.胃食管反流病相关性咽喉炎98例临床分析[J].临床内科杂志,2006,23(5):298-299. 被引量:15
  • 5祝丹,陈云舟.质子泵抑制药应用现状分析[J].医药导报,2007,26(1):36-38. 被引量:3
  • 6陆再英,钟南山主编.内科学.第7版.北京.人民卫生出版社.2008.411-414.
  • 7Fujimoto K, Hongo M. Safety and efficacy of long-term maintenance therapy with oral dose of rabeprazole 10 mg once daily in Japanese patients with reflux esophagitis [J]. Intern Med, 2011, 50 (3): 179-188.
  • 8Klotz U, Schwab M, Treiber G. CYP2C19 polymorphism and proton pump inhibitors [J]. Basic Clin Pharmaeol Toxicol, 2004, 95(1): 2-8.
  • 9Vakil N,van Zanten SV,Kahrilas P,et al.The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease:a global evidence-based consensus[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2006,101(8):1900-1920.
  • 10de Vries DR,Van Herwaarden MA,Smout AJ,et al.Gastroesophageal pressure gradients in gastroesophageal reflux disease:relations with hiatal hernia,body mass index,and esophagea acid exposure[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2008,103(6):1349-1354.

共引文献78

同被引文献12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部