期刊文献+

二语习得界面假说剖析 被引量:9

About Interface Hypothesis in SLA
原文传递
导出
摘要 界面假说是语言习得领域的一个新兴理论,它涵盖了一语磨损、双语习得,继承语习得、儿童及成人二语习得等多个方面。其主要观点是语言由语音、语义、句法、语用等模块构成;这些模块之间的互动形成界面;语言习得问题容易出现在界面,这些问题往往造成习得的推迟甚至石化;外部界面比内部界面更为薄弱。针对二语习得领域,本文从以下五个方面剖析该理论:1)界面如何形成?2)二语界面为何薄弱?3)外部界面一定比内部界面薄弱吗?4)二语习得界面假说的理论价值;5)后续研究。 Interface Hypothesis has recently become a prominent theory in language acquisition research, addressing a wide range of problems concerning L1 attrition, bilingualism, heritage language acquisition,child and adult L2 acquisition. Its principal notions are:(1) language is made up of modules such as phonology, semantics, syntax and pragmatics;(2) interactions among these modules create various interfaces;(3)acquisitional problems are likely to occur at interfaces and hence cause delay or even fossilization;(4) external interfaces are more vulnerable than internal interfaces. Within the scope of SLA, this paper analyzes this theory from such aspects: How interfaces form, why interfaces are vulnerable, whether external interfaces are more vulnerable than internal interfaces, what theoretical values Interface Hypothesis has, and how follow-up studies can be done.
作者 盛云岚
机构地区 同济大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期678-686,731,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 同济大学人文社科青年基金"二语句法与语篇界面习得研究"(1100219112)的阶段性成果
关键词 界面 界面假说 二语习得 interface Interface Hypothesis SLA
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Belletti, A., E. Bermati & A. Sorace. 2007. Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian [J]. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657-689.
  • 2Bohnacker, U. 2007. On the "vulnerability" of syntactic domains in Swedish and German [J]. Language Acquisition 14: 31-73.
  • 3Bos, P., B. Hollebrandse & P. Sleeman. 2004. The pragrnatics-syntax and the semantics-syntax interface in acquisition [J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics 42:101-110.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • 5Cuza, A. 2012. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: Interrogative subject-verb inversion in heritage Spanish [J]. International Journal of Bilingualism 17(1): 71-96.
  • 6Doepke, S. 1998. Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children [J]. Journal of Child Language 25: 555-584.
  • 7Hawkins, R. & C. Chan. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis [J]. Second Language Research 13: 187- 226.
  • 8Hopp, H. 2004. Syntactic and interface knowledge in advanced and near-native interlanguage grammars. [A]. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood-Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (eds.). EUROSLA Yearbook 4 [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67-94.
  • 9Ivanov, I. 2009. Topicality and clitic doubling in L2 Bulgarian: A test case for the interface hypothesis [A]. In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul & A. Tremblay (eds.). Proceedings of the lOth Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (2009) [C]. Somerville, MA, 17-24.
  • 10Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同被引文献57

引证文献9

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部