期刊文献+

以“道术”释“道”欠妥——《语文·先秦诸子选读》注释商榷

The Disapproval of the Explanation that "Dao(Doctrine) " Is Used by "Daoshu"——Discussion on the Annotation in "Selected Readings in Literature of Pre-Qin Philosophers"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "道术"一词,经过历史演变,其作为"政治主张"、"治国原则、方法"等意义已渐被弱化,更趋向"道家修身之术"或者是"道家哲学"。高中语文选修教材《论语·子路从而后》中,对"道之不行"的"道"释为"道术"实为不妥。梳理"道"一词的由来及历代诸家之说,此处的"道"当阐释为"治国之道"、"政治主张"为是。 After historical evolution, the word "Daoshu" is no longer used as "politics" or "the principle or way of administering a country" , but "self-cuhivation in Taoist" or "Taoist philosophy". Sorting out the authority annotations of "Dao" and combing the historical evolution of "Daoshu", this paper explains the disapproval of idea that "Dao (Doctrine)" is used by "Daoshu" when it comes to the sentence "As to the failure of fight principles to make progress" in "Selected Readings in Literature of Pre-Qin Philosophers" , which is a Chinese book for senior middle school.
作者 彭茂华
出处 《黔南民族师范学院学报》 2015年第5期89-91,96,共4页 Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities
关键词 道术 演变 商榷 Dao (Doctrine) Daoshu evolution discussion
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
  • 2王力.古代汉语[M].北京:中华书局,1984年版.
  • 3朱东润.中国历代文学作品选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
  • 4郭锡良.古代汉语(修订本)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
  • 5朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京,中华书局,2011.
  • 6胡其光,方环海.尔雅译注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2004.
  • 7许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,1963..
  • 8段玉裁.说文解字注[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,2006:398.
  • 9王世舜,王翠叶.尚书译注[M].北京:中华书局,2012.
  • 10孙武.孙子兵法[M ].北京:线装书局,2013.

共引文献1578

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部