期刊文献+

Optimizing progress variable definition in flamelet-based dimension reduction in combustion 被引量:2

Optimizing progress variable definition in flamelet-based dimension reduction in combustion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An automated method to optimize the definition of the progress variables in the flamelet-based dimension reduction is proposed. The performance of these optimized progress variables in coupling the flamelets and flow solver is presented. In the proposed method, the progress variables are defined according to the first two principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis (PCA) or kernel-density-weighted PCA (KEDPCA) of a set of flamelets. These flamelets can then be mapped to these new progress variables instead of the mixture fraction/conventional progress variables. Thus, a new chemistry look-up table is constructed. A priori validation of these optimized progress variables and the new chemistry table is implemented in a CH4/N2/air lift-off flame. The reconstruction of the lift-off flame shows that the optimized progress variables perform better than the conventional ones, especially in the high temperature area. The coefficient determinations (R2 statistics) show that the KEDPCA performs slightly better than the PCA except for some minor species. The main advantage of the KEDPCA is that it is less sensitive to the database. Meanwhile, the criteria for the optimization are proposed and discussed. The constraint that the progress variables should monotonically evolve from fresh gas to burnt gas is analyzed in detail. An automated method to optimize the definition of the progress variables in the flamelet-based dimension reduction is proposed. The performance of these optimized progress variables in coupling the flamelets and flow solver is presented. In the proposed method, the progress variables are defined according to the first two principal components (PCs) from the principal component analysis (PCA) or kernel-density-weighted PCA (KEDPCA) of a set of flamelets. These flamelets can then be mapped to these new progress variables instead of the mixture fraction/conventional progress variables. Thus, a new chemistry look-up table is constructed. A priori validation of these optimized progress variables and the new chemistry table is implemented in a CH4/N2/air lift-off flame. The reconstruction of the lift-off flame shows that the optimized progress variables perform better than the conventional ones, especially in the high temperature area. The coefficient determinations (R2 statistics) show that the KEDPCA performs slightly better than the PCA except for some minor species. The main advantage of the KEDPCA is that it is less sensitive to the database. Meanwhile, the criteria for the optimization are proposed and discussed. The constraint that the progress variables should monotonically evolve from fresh gas to burnt gas is analyzed in detail.
出处 《Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition)》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第11期1481-1498,共18页 应用数学和力学(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.50936005,51576182,and 11172296)
关键词 principal component analysis (PCA) oprogress variable flamelet-basedmodel dimension reduction principal component analysis (PCA),oprogress variable, flamelet-basedmodel, dimension reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Rabitz, H., Kramer, M., and Dacol, D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 34, 419-461 (1983).
  • 2Lutz, A. E., Kee, R. J., and Miller, J. A. Senkin: A Fortran Program for Predicting Homogeneous Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics with Sensitivity Analysis, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermere (1988).
  • 3Lu, T. and Law, C. K. A directed relation graph method for mechanism reduction. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30, 1333-1341 (2005).
  • 4Sun, W., Chen, Z., and Gou, X. A path flux analysis method for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms. Combustion and Flame, 157, 1298-1307 (2010).
  • 5Rao, C. V. and Arkin, A. P. Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: application to the gillespie algorithm. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 118, 4999-5010 (2003).
  • 6Rein, M. The partial equilibrium approximation in reacting flows. Physics of Fluids, A: Fluid Dynamics, 4, 873-886 (1992).
  • 7Pierce, C. D. and Moin, P. Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 504, 73-97 (2004).
  • 8Vreman, A., Albrecht, B., and van Oijen, J. Premixed and nonpremixed generated manifolds in large-eddy simulation of sandia flame d and f. Combustion and Flame, 153, 394- 416 (2008).
  • 9Gicquel, O., Darabiha, N., and Th@venin, D. Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion. Proceedings of the Com- bustion Institute, 28, 1901-1908 (2000).
  • 10Bilger, R. W., Pope, S. B., and Bray, K. N. C. Paradigms in turbulent combustion research. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 30, 21-42 (2005).

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部