期刊文献+

脑卒中患者行气管切开术后影响其预后的相关因素分析 被引量:10

The Analysis of Related Elements About the Stroke Outcome with Tracheostomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对脑卒中患者行气管切开术后影响其预后的可能因素进行分析。方法对入住本院神经内科重症病房的27例行气管切开术的脑卒中患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,对所有患者的卒中类型(分脑梗塞和脑出血)、病变部位(分幕上和幕下)、肢体瘫痪累及范围情况(分单侧和双侧)、年龄(分70岁以下和70岁以上)、术前格拉斯哥评分(GCS)等可能影响预后的因素进行单因素分析;追踪并记录患者术后3个月的预后改良的Rankin评分(mRS)。结果脑出血与脑梗塞组患者的mRS比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);幕上病变患者的mRS低于幕下病变组(P<0.05);双侧肢体瘫痪组与单侧肢体瘫痪组患者的mRS比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05);70岁以下年龄组的mRS明显低于70岁以上组(P<0.01);GCS小于8分组的mRS与GCS大于8分组的mRS存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论需行气管切开术的脑卒中患者总体预后较差,卒中类型及肢体瘫痪累及范围情况对预后无影响,幕下病变、高龄,低GCS的患者预后更差,医务人员需根据患者的一般情况谨慎选择气管切开术。 Objective To explore the relationship between the stroke outcome with tracheostomy and age,Glasgow Coma Scale( GCS),the stroke's type. Methods Retrospectively review 27 patients with stroke who received tracheostomy. The stroke's age,cerebral hemorrhage or infarction,infratentorial lesions or supratentorial lesions,diplegia or hemiparalysis were recorded,we also signed the GCS before tracheostomy and the modified scale Rankin( mRS) after three months.Results There were no difference between cerebral hemorrhage or infarction. The mRS of infratentorial lesions were higer than those in supratentorial lesions( P 0. 05). The stroke's mRS had no difference between diplegia and hemiparalysis( P 0. 05). The mRS of patients,whose age was over 70 was significantly higer than that of younger( P 0. 01). The mRS of patients whose GCS was more than 8 was significantly lower than that of lower( P 0. 05). Conclusions The stroke who needs tracheostomy has a poor outcome normally,Cerebral hemorrhage or infarction,diplegia or hemiparalysis are not related to the outcome. The patients who are older,infratentorial lesions,lower GCS have a worse outcome. We should be cautious to choose the tracheostomy and consider more about the patients' condition.
出处 《中南医学科学杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期572-574,共3页 Medical Science Journal of Central South China
关键词 脑卒中 气管切开术 格拉斯哥评分 改良的Rankin评分 stroke tracheostomy glasgow coma scale modified scale rankin
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Durbin CG Jr.Tracheostomy:why,when,and how[J].Respir Care,2010,55(8):1056-1068.
  • 2Freeman BD,Borecki IB,Coopersmith CM,et al.Relationship between tracheostomy timing and duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients[J].Crit Care Med,2005,33(11):2513-2520.
  • 3Frutos-Vivar F,Esteban A,Apezteguía C,et al.Outcome of mechanically ventilated patients who require a tracheostomy[J].Crit Care Med,2005,33(2):290-298.
  • 4陈征.重症脑卒中早期开放人工气道的临床价值评价[J].中外医疗,2014,33(12):86-86. 被引量:3
  • 5Rabinstein AA,Wijdicks EF.Outcome of survivors of acute stroke who require prolonged ventilatory assistance and tracheostomy[J].Cerebrovascular Diseases,2004,18(4):325-331.
  • 6Qureshi,Suarez,Parekh,et al.Prediction and timing of tracheostomy in patients with infratentorial lesions requiring mechanical ventilatory support[J].Critical Care Medicine,2000,28(5):1383-1387.
  • 7刘丽霞,周盛年,张晓,朴莲春,张正达.年龄老化对缺血性脑卒中发生发展和恢复的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(2):417-420. 被引量:27
  • 8K2lly-Hayes M,Beiser A,Kase CS,et al.The influnece of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke:the Framingham study[J].J Stroke cerebrovasc Dis,2003,12:119-126.

二级参考文献45

  • 1Goldstein LB,Adams R,Alberts MJ,et al.Primary prevention of ischemicstroke:a guideline from the American Heart Association/American StrokeAssociation Stroke Council:cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic PeripheralVascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group;Cardiovascular Nurs-ing Council;Clinical Cardiology Council;Nutrition,Physical Activity,andMetabolism Council;and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research In-terdisciplinary Working Group[J].Circulation,2006;113(24):e873-923.
  • 2Jernigan TL,Archibald SL,Fennema-Notestine C,et al.Effects of age ontissues and regions of the cerebrum and cerebellum[J].Neurobiol Aging,2001;22(4):581-94.
  • 3Eriksson PS,Perfilieva E,Bjork-Eriksson T,et al.Neurogenesis in the a-dult human hippocampus[J].Nat Med,1998;4:1313-7.
  • 4Jin K,Sun Y,Xie L,et al.Neurogenesis and aging:FGF-2 and HB-EGFrestore neurogenesis in hippocampus and subventricular zone of aged mice[J].Aging Cell,2003;2:175-83.
  • 5Maslov AY,Barone TA,Plunkett RJ,et al.Neural stem cell detection,characterization,and age-related changes in the subventricular zone ofmice[J].J Neurosci,2004;24:1726-33.
  • 6Leuner B,Kozorovitskiy Y,Gross CG,et al.Diminished adult neurogene-sis in the marmoset brain precedes old age[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2007;104:17169-73.
  • 7Pekcec A,Baumgartner W,Bankstahl JP,et al.Effect of aging on neuro-genesis in the canine brain[J].Aging Cell,2008;7:368-74.
  • 8Hattiangady B,Shetty AK.Aging does not alter the number or phenotypeof putative stem/progenitor cells in the neurogenic region of the hippo-campus[J].Neurobiol Aging,2008;29(1):129-47.
  • 9Driscoll I,Howard SR,Stone JC,et al.The aging hippocampus:a multi-level analysis in the ra(t J).Neuroscience,2006;139:1173-85.
  • 10Walter J,Keiner S,Witte OW,et al.Age-related effects on hippocampalprecursor cell subpopulations and neurogenesis[J].Neurobiol Aging,2009;24:369-72.

共引文献28

同被引文献77

引证文献10

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部