期刊文献+

非线性参数拟合的桥梁概率地震需求模型研究 被引量:8

A probabilistic seismic demand model by nonlinear parameter fitting method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对云图法建立概率地震需求模型时部分工程需求参数(EDP)与地震动强度参数(IM)间不满足对数线性回归关系假设的问题,建立某三跨混凝土连续梁桥的3D有限元模型。采用IDA方法建立桥梁概率地震需求模型,并以IDA分析结果为基准,在同一地震动参数下,采用基于不同拟合方式的云图法建立概率地震需求模型并得到了结构在不同破坏状态下的易损性曲线。研究表明,当EDP与IM之间的数量关系不满足云图法对数线性关系基本假设时,选择恰当的非线性参数拟合方式可以显著提高云图法建立概率地震需求模型的精度。 In order to solve the problem that when establishing a probabilistic seismic demand model by the cloud method,some Engineering Demand Parameters( EDPs) and ground motion intensity( IM) parameters do not meet the assumption of logarithmic linear regression relationship,a 3D finite element model of a three-span concrete continuous beam bridge was established. The bridge probabilistic seismic demand model was first established by incremental dynamic analysis( IDA). Taking the IDA analysis result as the benchmark,under the same seismic motion parameters,and using the cloud method based on various fitting modes to establish a probabilistic seismic demand model,the fragility curve under different breaking states was obtained. The results show that,when the quantitative relationship between EDP and IM does not meet the basic logarithmic linear relationship assumption of the cloud method,choosing appropriate nonlinear parameter fitting mode can significantly improve the precision of the probabilistic seismic demand model established by the cloud method.
出处 《哈尔滨工程大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期1212-1216,共5页 Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基金 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室基金资助项目(SLDRCE14-B-14) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51478339 51278376)
关键词 概率地震需求模型 云图法 IDA分析 非线性拟合 易损性分析 连续桥梁 probabilistic seismic demand model cloud method IDA nonlinear fitting fragility analysis continuous beam bridge
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献41

  • 1H.Hwang,刘晶波.地震作用下钢筋混凝土桥梁结构易损性分析[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):47-51. 被引量:184
  • 2吕大刚.基于线性化Nataf变换的一次可靠度方法[J].工程力学,2007,24(5):79-86. 被引量:34
  • 3Singhal A, Kiremidjian A. Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. 1998; 124(8) : 922 - 929.
  • 4Shinozuka M, Feng M Q, Lee J. Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2000; 126(2) : 1224 - 1231.
  • 5Hwang H H M, Jernigan J Bet al. Evaluation of Seismic Damage to Memphis Bridges and Highway Systems. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2000; 5(4) :322 - 330.
  • 6Shinozuka M, Feng M Q, Kim H et al. Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development.Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2000 ; 126 (12) :1287- 1295.
  • 7Karim K R, Yamazaki F, Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2001; 30 ( 12 ) :1839- 1856.
  • 8Karim K R,Yamazaki F. A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 2003;32:1603 - 1626.
  • 9Gardoni P, Der Kiureghian A, Mosalam K M. Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for RC Columns Based on Experimental Observations.Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, accepted for publication. 2002.
  • 10Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures, 2004; 26:187-199.

共引文献99

同被引文献41

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部