期刊文献+

比较效果研究中结局指标的选择与应用 被引量:3

Application of outcome measures in comparative effectiveness research
原文传递
导出
摘要 比较效果研究(CER)作为在真实复杂医疗环境中进行临床决策的重要研究方法,其结局指标的选择有着灵活、贴近现实、以患者为中心等特点。首先简要介绍比较效果研究的概念特点,分析研究中各要素,并着重解释结局指标的特点,最后应用实例呈现生存质量、健康状况、患者报告结局、卫生经济学指标、长期随访结局、定性研究结局等比较效果研究中常用指标的适用情况及意义。 Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is an important method for decision making in real clinical environment, and the outcome measures of CER are more flexible, closer to reality and patient- centered. Firstly, CER is introduce, with the structure of the study analyzed, and the characteristics of outcome measures in CER is introduced in details, then the frequently used outcome measurements, such as quality of life, health status, patient-reported outcome, health-economic outcome, long-term follow-up outcome and qualitative outcome, are listed and discussed with application examples.
出处 《现代中医临床》 2015年第5期22-25,共4页 Modern Chinese Clinical Medicine
基金 国家中医药管理局2012年中医药行业科研专项(No.201207007) 北京中医药大学中青年教师自主课题(No.2015-JYB-JSMS038) 北京中医药大学创新团队(No.2011-CXTD-09)
关键词 比较效果研究 研究方法学 循证医学 结局指标 医疗卫生服务 comparative effectiveness research research methodology evidence-based medicine out-come measure heahhcare service
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Medical Research Council.A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health.London:Medical Research Council.2000:1-18.
  • 2Paterson C,Briten N.Acupuncture as a complex intervention:a holistic model.J Altern Complement Med.2004;10(5):791-801.
  • 3Draucker CB,Martsolf DS,Ross R,Rusk TB.Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory.Qual Health Res.2007;17(8):1137-1148.
  • 4Corbin J,Strauss A.Grounded theory research:procedures,canons and evaluative criteria.Qual Sociol.1990;13(1):3-21.
  • 5Holloway I.Basic concepts for qualitative research.Oxford:Blackwell Science.1997:82-83.
  • 6McLellan E,MacQueen MK,Neidig LJ.Beyond the qualitative interview:data preparation and transcription.Field Methods.2003;15(1):63-84.
  • 7Walker D,Myrick F.Grounded theory:an exploration of process and procedure.Qual Health Res.2006; 16(4):547-559.
  • 8Charmaz K.Constructing grounded theory:a practical guide through qualitative analysis.London:Sage Publications Inc.2006:45-80.
  • 9Bradley EH,Curry L,Devers KJ.Qualitative data analysis for health services research:developing taxonomy,themes,and theory.Health Serv Res.2007;42(4):1758-1772.
  • 10Thompson EA,Quinn T,Paterson C,Cooke H,McQuigan D,Butters G.Outcome measures for holistic,complex interventions within the palliative care setting.Complement Ther Clin Pract.2008;14(1):25-32.

共引文献67

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部