期刊文献+

基于静态定价机制的团购网站退款策略研究 被引量:2

The Research of Group-buying Website Refund Strategy Based on Static Pricing Mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 网络团购近些年在中国发展迅速,已经成为一种主流的电子商务消费模式.随着消费者权益保护意识的增强,越来越多的问题亟待团购网站解决,退款问题就是其中之一.在静态定价机制的前提下,构建单个团购网站和单个商家组成的二级主导型供应链模型,在微观经济学理性经济人的假设下,参考stackelberg利润分配博弈理论,研究团购网站执行不同退款策略时商家和网站的最优利润分配策略.并经过算例分析后,给出当消费者和市场具有不同特征时,团购网站的最佳退款策略. In recent years,online group-buying is developing rapidly,which has become one of the main e-commerce models.With the growth of consumer awareness to protect their rights and interests,more and-more problems need to be solved by group-buying websites.Refund problem is a key issue.On the premise of static pricing mechanism,this article compared two common refund policy on the market based on the theoretical model and numerical example.Through the study of the two refund policy,this article found that when other conditions are unchanged,refund strategy need to be decided according to the characteristics of the consumers.When the consumers are very sensitive and with strong sense of rights protection,group-buying websites should refund to the customer who has not consumed,in order to attract more consumers and thus achieve profit maximization.
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2015年第19期293-300,共8页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 国家自然科学基金(71203218) 国家自然科学基金(71172199)
关键词 网络团购 退款策略 静态定价 online group-buying refund strategy static pricing mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1团800.2014年度中国团购市场统计报告[R].
  • 2Anand K S, and Aron R. Group Buying on the Web: A comparison of Price Discovery Mechanisms IJ]. Management Science, 2003, 49(11-49), 1546-1562.
  • 3Kauflman R J, Wang B. Bid together, buy together: on the elYicacy of group-buying business models in Inlemet-based selling[RI. MISRC working Paper, University of Minnesota, 2001, May 16.
  • 4Krishnan S. Anand, Ravi Aron. Group buying on the web: A comparison of price-discovery mech-.anisms [J]. Management Science, 2003, 49: 1456-1562.
  • 5Hsiangchu Lai, Her-Sen Doong, Chi-Chung Kao and Gregory E. Kersten, Negotiators Communica- tion, Perception of Their Counterparts, and Performance in Dyadic E-negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 15, No. 2, September2006: 429-447.
  • 6Chen J, et al. Should we collude? Analyzing the benefits of bidder cooperation in online group- buying auctions[J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2009(8): 191-202.
  • 7Edelman B. jaffe S, Kominers S D. To groupon or not to groupon: the profitability of deep discou- nis[J]. W'orking Paper. 2011, 10.
  • 8姚磊,李英,王凤杰.基于博弈论的电子商务团购信任问题研究[J].华东经济管理,2010,24(3):117-119. 被引量:28
  • 9张翔,杨波,谭德庆.考虑团购消费者的耐用品销售定价策略[J].统计与决策,2010,26(2):172-173. 被引量:2
  • 10廖开际,吴敏.基于群体博弈的网络团购分析[J].统计与决策,2012,28(1):66-69. 被引量:15

二级参考文献90

共引文献122

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部